Comprehensive neuropsychological assessment and predictors of cognitive functioning at six months after COVID-19 in patients treated in the ICU, regular hospital ward, or isolated at home.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Riikka Pihlaja, Henriikka Ollila, Annamari Tuulio-Henriksson, Sanna Koskinen, Viljami Salmela, Marjaana Tiainen, Johanna Hästbacka, Laura Hokkanen
{"title":"Comprehensive neuropsychological assessment and predictors of cognitive functioning at six months after COVID-19 in patients treated in the ICU, regular hospital ward, or isolated at home.","authors":"Riikka Pihlaja, Henriikka Ollila, Annamari Tuulio-Henriksson, Sanna Koskinen, Viljami Salmela, Marjaana Tiainen, Johanna Hästbacka, Laura Hokkanen","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2454352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive impairment in patients with COVID-19 has been reported, but findings are inconsistent. This study assessed cognitive functioning 6 months post-infection across three COVID-19 severity groups compared to non-COVID controls. Seventy-two ICU-treated, 49 ward-treated, and 44 home-isolated patients with COVID-19, along with 48 controls, underwent neuropsychological evaluation and assessment of subjective cognitive symptoms, depressive symptoms, and fatigue. Cognitive test scores were compared using ANCOVA. Associations between cognitive functioning and variables including demographics, illness severity, comorbidities, depressive symptoms, fatigue, and ICU-related factors were examined with hierarchical linear regression models. Results showed no significant differences in cognitive test performance of impairment frequencies between COVID-19 groups and controls. However, patients with COVID-19 reported higher levels of subjective cognitive symptoms, depressive symptoms, and fatigue compared to controls. Predictors of cognitive functioning included age, education, and, to a lesser extent, comorbidities. COVID-19 severity, depression, fatigue, or ICU-related variables did not significantly impact performance. These findings suggest that while individual cognitive impairments may exist, overall cognitive functioning in patients with COVID-19 was comparable to controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2454352","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive impairment in patients with COVID-19 has been reported, but findings are inconsistent. This study assessed cognitive functioning 6 months post-infection across three COVID-19 severity groups compared to non-COVID controls. Seventy-two ICU-treated, 49 ward-treated, and 44 home-isolated patients with COVID-19, along with 48 controls, underwent neuropsychological evaluation and assessment of subjective cognitive symptoms, depressive symptoms, and fatigue. Cognitive test scores were compared using ANCOVA. Associations between cognitive functioning and variables including demographics, illness severity, comorbidities, depressive symptoms, fatigue, and ICU-related factors were examined with hierarchical linear regression models. Results showed no significant differences in cognitive test performance of impairment frequencies between COVID-19 groups and controls. However, patients with COVID-19 reported higher levels of subjective cognitive symptoms, depressive symptoms, and fatigue compared to controls. Predictors of cognitive functioning included age, education, and, to a lesser extent, comorbidities. COVID-19 severity, depression, fatigue, or ICU-related variables did not significantly impact performance. These findings suggest that while individual cognitive impairments may exist, overall cognitive functioning in patients with COVID-19 was comparable to controls.

在ICU、普通医院病房或家中隔离的患者在COVID-19后6个月的综合神经心理学评估和认知功能预测因素
有报道称COVID-19患者存在认知障碍,但研究结果不一致。与非covid对照组相比,该研究评估了三个COVID-19严重组感染后6个月的认知功能。对72名重症监护病房治疗、49名病房治疗和44名家庭隔离的COVID-19患者以及48名对照组进行了神经心理学评估,并评估了主观认知症状、抑郁症状和疲劳。认知测试得分采用ANCOVA进行比较。认知功能与人口统计学、疾病严重程度、合并症、抑郁症状、疲劳和重症监护病房相关因素等变量之间的关系采用层次线性回归模型进行检验。结果显示,新冠肺炎组和对照组在认知测试中损伤频率的表现无显著差异。然而,与对照组相比,COVID-19患者报告的主观认知症状、抑郁症状和疲劳程度更高。认知功能的预测因素包括年龄、教育程度,以及在较小程度上的合并症。COVID-19严重程度、抑郁、疲劳或重症监护病房相关变量对表现没有显著影响。这些发现表明,虽然可能存在个体认知障碍,但COVID-19患者的整体认知功能与对照组相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信