Age-related mortality risk in cycling trauma: analysis of the National Trauma Databank 2017-2023.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Marta A W Rowh, Taylor A Giller, John N Bliton, Randi N Smith, Tim P Moran
{"title":"Age-related mortality risk in cycling trauma: analysis of the National Trauma Databank 2017-2023.","authors":"Marta A W Rowh, Taylor A Giller, John N Bliton, Randi N Smith, Tim P Moran","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00558-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cycling promotes health but carries significant injury risks, especially for older adults. In the U.S., cycling fatalities have increased since 1990, with adults over 50 now at the highest risk. As the population ages, the burden of cycling-related trauma is expected to grow, yet age-specific factors associated with mortality risk remain unclear. This study identifies age-specific mortality risk thresholds to inform targeted public health strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) data (2017-2023) on non-motorized cycling injuries. A total of 185,960 records were analyzed using logistic regression with splines to evaluate the relationship between age and mortality risk. The dataset was split into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets. Age thresholds where mortality risk changed were identified, and models were adjusted for injury severity, comorbidities, and helmet use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median patient age was 43 years (IQR 20-58). Four key age thresholds (12, 17, 31, and 69) were identified, with the largest mortality increase after age 69. Our model achieved an AUC of 0.93, surpassing traditional age cutoff models, with 84.6% sensitivity and 88.0% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Age is a significant predictor of mortality in cycling trauma, with marked increases in risk during adolescence and for adults over 69. These findings underscore the need for age-targeted interventions, such as improved cycling infrastructure for teens and enhanced safety measures for older adults. Public health initiatives should prioritize these vulnerable age groups to reduce cycling-related mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":"12 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00558-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cycling promotes health but carries significant injury risks, especially for older adults. In the U.S., cycling fatalities have increased since 1990, with adults over 50 now at the highest risk. As the population ages, the burden of cycling-related trauma is expected to grow, yet age-specific factors associated with mortality risk remain unclear. This study identifies age-specific mortality risk thresholds to inform targeted public health strategies.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) data (2017-2023) on non-motorized cycling injuries. A total of 185,960 records were analyzed using logistic regression with splines to evaluate the relationship between age and mortality risk. The dataset was split into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets. Age thresholds where mortality risk changed were identified, and models were adjusted for injury severity, comorbidities, and helmet use.

Results: The median patient age was 43 years (IQR 20-58). Four key age thresholds (12, 17, 31, and 69) were identified, with the largest mortality increase after age 69. Our model achieved an AUC of 0.93, surpassing traditional age cutoff models, with 84.6% sensitivity and 88.0% specificity.

Conclusions: Age is a significant predictor of mortality in cycling trauma, with marked increases in risk during adolescence and for adults over 69. These findings underscore the need for age-targeted interventions, such as improved cycling infrastructure for teens and enhanced safety measures for older adults. Public health initiatives should prioritize these vulnerable age groups to reduce cycling-related mortality.

骑车创伤中与年龄相关的死亡风险:2017-2023年国家创伤数据库分析
背景:骑自行车促进健康,但有很大的伤害风险,尤其是对老年人。在美国,自1990年以来,骑自行车造成的死亡人数一直在增加,目前50岁以上的成年人的风险最高。随着人口老龄化,骑车相关创伤的负担预计会增加,但与死亡风险相关的年龄特异性因素仍不清楚。本研究确定了特定年龄的死亡风险阈值,为有针对性的公共卫生战略提供信息。方法:我们对国家创伤数据库(NTDB) 2017-2023年非机动自行车损伤数据进行了横断面分析。采用样条逻辑回归分析共185,960份记录,以评估年龄与死亡风险之间的关系。数据集分为训练集(80%)和测试集(20%)。确定死亡风险发生变化的年龄阈值,并根据损伤严重程度、合并症和头盔使用情况调整模型。结果:患者中位年龄43岁(IQR 20 ~ 58岁)。确定了四个关键年龄阈值(12岁、17岁、31岁和69岁),其中69岁后死亡率增幅最大。该模型的AUC为0.93,超过了传统的年龄截止模型,敏感性为84.6%,特异性为88.0%。结论:年龄是循环创伤死亡率的重要预测因子,在青春期和69岁以上的成年人中,风险显著增加。这些发现强调了针对年龄的干预措施的必要性,例如改善青少年的自行车基础设施,加强老年人的安全措施。公共卫生行动应优先考虑这些易受伤害的年龄组,以减少与骑自行车有关的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Injury Epidemiology
Injury Epidemiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Injury Epidemiology is dedicated to advancing the scientific foundation for injury prevention and control through timely publication and dissemination of peer-reviewed research. Injury Epidemiology aims to be the premier venue for communicating epidemiologic studies of unintentional and intentional injuries, including, but not limited to, morbidity and mortality from motor vehicle crashes, drug overdose/poisoning, falls, drowning, fires/burns, iatrogenic injury, suicide, homicide, assaults, and abuse. We welcome investigations designed to understand the magnitude, distribution, determinants, causes, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and outcomes of injuries in specific population groups, geographic regions, and environmental settings (e.g., home, workplace, transport, recreation, sports, and urban/rural). Injury Epidemiology has a special focus on studies generating objective and practical knowledge that can be translated into interventions to reduce injury morbidity and mortality on a population level. Priority consideration will be given to manuscripts that feature contemporary theories and concepts, innovative methods, and novel techniques as applied to injury surveillance, risk assessment, development and implementation of effective interventions, and program and policy evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信