Patient flow problems affecting in-patient spinal cord injury rehabilitation in the Netherlands.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Linda M M van der Schriek, Marcel W M Post, Catja A Dijkstra, Peter W New, Janneke M Stolwijk-Swüste
{"title":"Patient flow problems affecting in-patient spinal cord injury rehabilitation in the Netherlands.","authors":"Linda M M van der Schriek, Marcel W M Post, Catja A Dijkstra, Peter W New, Janneke M Stolwijk-Swüste","doi":"10.1038/s41393-024-01058-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe barriers to admission to and discharge from an inpatient rehabilitation unit for patients with newly acquired spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) and to identify modifiable factors whereby patient flow can be optimized.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In-patients with newly acquired SCI/D referred to a rehabilitation centre in the Netherlands between December 2018 and December 2019 were included. Demographic, clinical characteristics and information about waiting days and causes of delay were recorded. Descriptive analysis was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 105 patients were included; 33 patients (31%) were female, mean age was 59 years, 60% had a non-traumatic SCI/D, 42% of the SCI/D were tetraplegia and 62% were AIS D at referral. No significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics were found between patients with and without a barrier to admission. Most common admission barriers were bed availability and capacity of nursing and other health staff. The most frequent discharge barriers were delay in care approval, lack of availability of nursing home places and waiting for home modifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most frequent admission barriers were availability of beds and staffing capacity; most discharge barriers were problems with home modifications, waiting for care approval or a nursing home place. Recommendations for reducing these barriers are recognizing a potential problem at an early stage, timely communication with patient and/or family about options for discharge, while simultaneously initiating a home modification plan and exploring temporary accommodation options.</p>","PeriodicalId":21976,"journal":{"name":"Spinal cord","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal cord","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-024-01058-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Objectives: To describe barriers to admission to and discharge from an inpatient rehabilitation unit for patients with newly acquired spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/D) and to identify modifiable factors whereby patient flow can be optimized.

Setting: Netherlands.

Methods: In-patients with newly acquired SCI/D referred to a rehabilitation centre in the Netherlands between December 2018 and December 2019 were included. Demographic, clinical characteristics and information about waiting days and causes of delay were recorded. Descriptive analysis was used.

Results: In total, 105 patients were included; 33 patients (31%) were female, mean age was 59 years, 60% had a non-traumatic SCI/D, 42% of the SCI/D were tetraplegia and 62% were AIS D at referral. No significant differences in demographic or clinical characteristics were found between patients with and without a barrier to admission. Most common admission barriers were bed availability and capacity of nursing and other health staff. The most frequent discharge barriers were delay in care approval, lack of availability of nursing home places and waiting for home modifications.

Conclusion: Most frequent admission barriers were availability of beds and staffing capacity; most discharge barriers were problems with home modifications, waiting for care approval or a nursing home place. Recommendations for reducing these barriers are recognizing a potential problem at an early stage, timely communication with patient and/or family about options for discharge, while simultaneously initiating a home modification plan and exploring temporary accommodation options.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spinal cord
Spinal cord 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
142
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Spinal Cord is a specialised, international journal that has been publishing spinal cord related manuscripts since 1963. It appears monthly, online and in print, and accepts contributions on spinal cord anatomy, physiology, management of injury and disease, and the quality of life and life circumstances of people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord is multi-disciplinary and publishes contributions across the entire spectrum of research ranging from basic science to applied clinical research. It focuses on high quality original research, systematic reviews and narrative reviews. Spinal Cord''s sister journal Spinal Cord Series and Cases: Clinical Management in Spinal Cord Disorders publishes high quality case reports, small case series, pilot and retrospective studies perspectives, Pulse survey articles, Point-couterpoint articles, correspondences and book reviews. It specialises in material that addresses all aspects of life for persons with spinal cord injuries or disorders. For more information, please see the aims and scope of Spinal Cord Series and Cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信