Young-Hoon Byun, Ji-Eun Kim, So-Hyun Paek, Min-Jung Kim, Soo Hyun Park, Ho-Young Song, Jaehyun Kwon
{"title":"Effectiveness of Antiviral Treatment with Intravenous Peramivir and Oral Oseltamivir for Seasonal Influenza in Children.","authors":"Young-Hoon Byun, Ji-Eun Kim, So-Hyun Paek, Min-Jung Kim, Soo Hyun Park, Ho-Young Song, Jaehyun Kwon","doi":"10.3390/children12010026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Influenza poses significant risks in children, causing complications like febrile seizures and hospitalizations. Antiviral treatments include oseltamivir and peramivir, both FDA-approved neuraminidase inhibitors. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of intravenous peramivir and oral oseltamivir in pediatric patients presenting to an emergency department, with a primary focus on the revisit rate within 72 h post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study analyzed 1327 children aged 1-15 years diagnosed with influenza A or B between 1 January 2019 and 29 February 2020, at a single urban hospital. Patients were divided into oseltamivir (n = 1243) and peramivir (n = 84) groups. Data included demographics, clinical symptoms, emergency department stays, and revisit rates. Fisher's exact test was used for analysis, with <i>p</i>-values < 0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1327 pediatric patients were included, with 1243 receiving oseltamivir and 84 receiving peramivir. Patients in the peramivir group were older (median age 5.88 years vs. 4.54 years, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and had higher rates of gastrointestinal symptoms. The emergency department length of stay was significantly longer in the peramivir group (167 min vs. 63 min, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The revisit rate within 3 days was 5.63% for oseltamivir and 9.52% for peramivir, with no statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Peramivir presents as an effective alternative treatment for influenza in children, particularly in situations where oral administration is not feasible due to gastrointestinal intolerance, highlighting the importance of an alternative route of antiviral administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":48588,"journal":{"name":"Children-Basel","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/children12010026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/objectives: Influenza poses significant risks in children, causing complications like febrile seizures and hospitalizations. Antiviral treatments include oseltamivir and peramivir, both FDA-approved neuraminidase inhibitors. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of intravenous peramivir and oral oseltamivir in pediatric patients presenting to an emergency department, with a primary focus on the revisit rate within 72 h post-treatment.
Methods: A retrospective study analyzed 1327 children aged 1-15 years diagnosed with influenza A or B between 1 January 2019 and 29 February 2020, at a single urban hospital. Patients were divided into oseltamivir (n = 1243) and peramivir (n = 84) groups. Data included demographics, clinical symptoms, emergency department stays, and revisit rates. Fisher's exact test was used for analysis, with p-values < 0.05 considered significant.
Results: A total of 1327 pediatric patients were included, with 1243 receiving oseltamivir and 84 receiving peramivir. Patients in the peramivir group were older (median age 5.88 years vs. 4.54 years, p = 0.002) and had higher rates of gastrointestinal symptoms. The emergency department length of stay was significantly longer in the peramivir group (167 min vs. 63 min, p < 0.001). The revisit rate within 3 days was 5.63% for oseltamivir and 9.52% for peramivir, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.22).
Conclusions: Peramivir presents as an effective alternative treatment for influenza in children, particularly in situations where oral administration is not feasible due to gastrointestinal intolerance, highlighting the importance of an alternative route of antiviral administration.
期刊介绍:
Children is an international, open access journal dedicated to a streamlined, yet scientifically rigorous, dissemination of peer-reviewed science related to childhood health and disease in developed and developing countries.
The publication focuses on sharing clinical, epidemiological and translational science relevant to children’s health. Moreover, the primary goals of the publication are to highlight under‑represented pediatric disciplines, to emphasize interdisciplinary research and to disseminate advances in knowledge in global child health. In addition to original research, the journal publishes expert editorials and commentaries, clinical case reports, and insightful communications reflecting the latest developments in pediatric medicine. By publishing meritorious articles as soon as the editorial review process is completed, rather than at predefined intervals, Children also permits rapid open access sharing of new information, allowing us to reach the broadest audience in the most expedient fashion.