Evaluation of lumbar vertebral bone quality using T1-weighted MRI: Can it differentiate normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis?

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Sevde Nur Emir, Gülbanu Güner
{"title":"Evaluation of lumbar vertebral bone quality using T1-weighted MRI: Can it differentiate normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis?","authors":"Sevde Nur Emir,&nbsp;Gülbanu Güner","doi":"10.1016/j.jocd.2025.101561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Background:</em> Osteoporosis, a systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration, poses a significant public health challenge globally. While the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis is dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), its use is limited by factors like spinal deformities and artifacts. This study aims to explore the potential of routine T1-weighted MRI sequences in predicting osteopenia and osteoporosis through the vertebral bone signal (VB) to cerebrospinal fluid signal (CSF) ratio.</div><div><em>Methodology:</em> We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent both DXA and lumbar MRI within a six-month interval between 2020 and 2023. Excluding patients with known vertebral fractures, bone tumors, heterogeneous bone marrow, or endplate signal changes due to degenerative alterations, we divided the patients into normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic groups based on their DXA T-scores. The T1-weighted sagittal MRI sequences were analyzed, and the T1 VB/CSF ratios were calculated for each vertebra (L1–L4).</div><div><em>Results:</em> The study included 376 patients, with an average age of 60.8 ± 9.1 years. Statistically significant differences were found in the T1 VB/CSF ratios across the normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic groups (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). The L1 vertebra demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance for predicting osteoporosis, with an AUC of 0.75, a sensitivity of 88.1 %, and a specificity of 84.5 %. For differentiating osteopenia from normal, the L1 vertebra achieved an AUC of 0.68, with a sensitivity of 78.2 % and a specificity of 76.4 %. The optimal cut-off values were determined as 3.62 for osteopenia and 3.80 for osteoporosis.</div><div><em>Conclusion:</em> The T1 VB/CSF ratio derived from routine lumbar MRI sequences provides a promising, radiation-free tool for opportunistic screening of osteoporosis and osteopenia. Given the frequent use of lumbar MRI for patients with spinal complaints, this method could facilitate early diagnosis and intervention, guiding high-risk patients towards further DXA evaluation and management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","volume":"28 2","pages":"Article 101561"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695025000010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osteoporosis, a systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration, poses a significant public health challenge globally. While the gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis is dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), its use is limited by factors like spinal deformities and artifacts. This study aims to explore the potential of routine T1-weighted MRI sequences in predicting osteopenia and osteoporosis through the vertebral bone signal (VB) to cerebrospinal fluid signal (CSF) ratio.
Methodology: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent both DXA and lumbar MRI within a six-month interval between 2020 and 2023. Excluding patients with known vertebral fractures, bone tumors, heterogeneous bone marrow, or endplate signal changes due to degenerative alterations, we divided the patients into normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic groups based on their DXA T-scores. The T1-weighted sagittal MRI sequences were analyzed, and the T1 VB/CSF ratios were calculated for each vertebra (L1–L4).
Results: The study included 376 patients, with an average age of 60.8 ± 9.1 years. Statistically significant differences were found in the T1 VB/CSF ratios across the normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic groups (p < 0.05). The L1 vertebra demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance for predicting osteoporosis, with an AUC of 0.75, a sensitivity of 88.1 %, and a specificity of 84.5 %. For differentiating osteopenia from normal, the L1 vertebra achieved an AUC of 0.68, with a sensitivity of 78.2 % and a specificity of 76.4 %. The optimal cut-off values were determined as 3.62 for osteopenia and 3.80 for osteoporosis.
Conclusion: The T1 VB/CSF ratio derived from routine lumbar MRI sequences provides a promising, radiation-free tool for opportunistic screening of osteoporosis and osteopenia. Given the frequent use of lumbar MRI for patients with spinal complaints, this method could facilitate early diagnosis and intervention, guiding high-risk patients towards further DXA evaluation and management.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Journal of Clinical Densitometry 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal is committed to serving ISCD''s mission - the education of heterogenous physician specialties and technologists who are involved in the clinical assessment of skeletal health. The focus of JCD is bone mass measurement, including epidemiology of bone mass, how drugs and diseases alter bone mass, new techniques and quality assurance in bone mass imaging technologies, and bone mass health/economics. Combining high quality research and review articles with sound, practice-oriented advice, JCD meets the diverse diagnostic and management needs of radiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists, rheumatologists, gynecologists, family physicians, internists, and technologists whose patients require diagnostic clinical densitometry for therapeutic management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信