Clinical features, diagnosis, management, and prognosis of circumscribed choroidal hemangioma.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Zuyi Yang, Dianzhe Tian, Zhixuan Xie, Tiantian Cheng, Youxin Chen, Xinyu Zhao
{"title":"Clinical features, diagnosis, management, and prognosis of circumscribed choroidal hemangioma.","authors":"Zuyi Yang, Dianzhe Tian, Zhixuan Xie, Tiantian Cheng, Youxin Chen, Xinyu Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Because of its benign nature and rarity, circumscribed choroidal hemangioma (CCH) often receives limited attention, leading to a high rate of misdiagnosis and a lack of standardized treatment protocols. We provide a thorough clarification of the demographics, clinical features, diagnosis, management, and prognosis of CCH. We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Ovid databases up to December, 2023, to identify relevant studies. The study included 106 studies encompassing 3,854 patients with CCH. The demographic profile revealed a male preponderance (62%, 95% CI 61%-64%) and a peak incidence in the working-age population (30-50 years, 48%, 95% CI 39%-57%), with the right eye being involved in 50% of cases (95% CI 48%-53%). Clinically, the most common symptom was decreased vision (90%, 95% CI 78%-99%), followed by blurred vision, visual field defect, and metamorphopsia. Fundus examination frequently revealed an orange-colored tumor (80%, 95% CI 58%-96%) located subfoveally (48%, 95% CI 42%-53%), often accompanied by subretinal fluid (SRF) (84%, 95% CI 78%-89%) and sometimes exudative retinal detachment (69%, 95% CI 51%-85%). The proportion of correctly diagnosed CCH upon first presentation was 13% (95% CI 3%-26%), with CCH commonly misdiagnosed as unspecified choroidal tumors, choroidal metastasis, and central serous chorioretinopathy. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was the most widely researched treatment, taking up 18% (95% CI 8%-31%), followed by observation, transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT), and laser photocoagulation. When no treatment was applied, 33% of patients experienced visual acuity improvement, which increased to 76% (95% CI 58%-90%) with radiotherapy and 58% (95% CI 50%-67%) with PDT. In terms of tumor shrinkage, radiotherapy was most effective (100%), with PDT close behind (95% CI 96%-100%), and TTT at 63% (95% CI 45%-80%). PDT led to SRF resolution in 89% (95% CI 77%-97%) of patients and cystoid macular edema (CME) resolution in 73% (95% CI 38%-97%), while radiotherapy achieved the highest efficacy with 100% SRF resolution (95% CI: 99%-100%) and 100% CME resolution (95% CI: 83%-100%). Complication rates were highest with radiotherapy (14%, 95% CI 5%-25%) and PDT (9%, 95% CI 4%-16%). First-line treatment failure rates were highest for TTT (71%, 95% CI 44%-92%) and laser (70%, 95% CI 28%-99%), with radiotherapy showing the lowest rate (0%, 95% CI 0%-2%). Recurrence rates were highest for laser (68%, 95% CI 17%-100%) and TTT (62%, 95% CI 26%-93%), whereas radiotherapy had the lowest recurrence rate (0%, 95% CI 0%-1%). CCH predominantly affects the working-age male population, often leading to vision impairment and SRF. The diagnosis of CCH remains challenging, with low accuracy and frequent misdiagnoses. While PDT is the most widely researched treatment, radiotherapy offers superior outcomes in visual acuity, tumor shrinkage, and resolution of SRF and CME, though it carries higher complication rates. This study highlights the need for improved diagnostic accuracy and a balanced approach to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.01.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because of its benign nature and rarity, circumscribed choroidal hemangioma (CCH) often receives limited attention, leading to a high rate of misdiagnosis and a lack of standardized treatment protocols. We provide a thorough clarification of the demographics, clinical features, diagnosis, management, and prognosis of CCH. We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Ovid databases up to December, 2023, to identify relevant studies. The study included 106 studies encompassing 3,854 patients with CCH. The demographic profile revealed a male preponderance (62%, 95% CI 61%-64%) and a peak incidence in the working-age population (30-50 years, 48%, 95% CI 39%-57%), with the right eye being involved in 50% of cases (95% CI 48%-53%). Clinically, the most common symptom was decreased vision (90%, 95% CI 78%-99%), followed by blurred vision, visual field defect, and metamorphopsia. Fundus examination frequently revealed an orange-colored tumor (80%, 95% CI 58%-96%) located subfoveally (48%, 95% CI 42%-53%), often accompanied by subretinal fluid (SRF) (84%, 95% CI 78%-89%) and sometimes exudative retinal detachment (69%, 95% CI 51%-85%). The proportion of correctly diagnosed CCH upon first presentation was 13% (95% CI 3%-26%), with CCH commonly misdiagnosed as unspecified choroidal tumors, choroidal metastasis, and central serous chorioretinopathy. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) was the most widely researched treatment, taking up 18% (95% CI 8%-31%), followed by observation, transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT), and laser photocoagulation. When no treatment was applied, 33% of patients experienced visual acuity improvement, which increased to 76% (95% CI 58%-90%) with radiotherapy and 58% (95% CI 50%-67%) with PDT. In terms of tumor shrinkage, radiotherapy was most effective (100%), with PDT close behind (95% CI 96%-100%), and TTT at 63% (95% CI 45%-80%). PDT led to SRF resolution in 89% (95% CI 77%-97%) of patients and cystoid macular edema (CME) resolution in 73% (95% CI 38%-97%), while radiotherapy achieved the highest efficacy with 100% SRF resolution (95% CI: 99%-100%) and 100% CME resolution (95% CI: 83%-100%). Complication rates were highest with radiotherapy (14%, 95% CI 5%-25%) and PDT (9%, 95% CI 4%-16%). First-line treatment failure rates were highest for TTT (71%, 95% CI 44%-92%) and laser (70%, 95% CI 28%-99%), with radiotherapy showing the lowest rate (0%, 95% CI 0%-2%). Recurrence rates were highest for laser (68%, 95% CI 17%-100%) and TTT (62%, 95% CI 26%-93%), whereas radiotherapy had the lowest recurrence rate (0%, 95% CI 0%-1%). CCH predominantly affects the working-age male population, often leading to vision impairment and SRF. The diagnosis of CCH remains challenging, with low accuracy and frequent misdiagnoses. While PDT is the most widely researched treatment, radiotherapy offers superior outcomes in visual acuity, tumor shrinkage, and resolution of SRF and CME, though it carries higher complication rates. This study highlights the need for improved diagnostic accuracy and a balanced approach to treatment.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Survey of ophthalmology
Survey of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
14.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信