Inhibition of the basolateral amygdala to prelimbic cortex pathway enhances risk-taking during risky decision-making shock task in rats

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ni Liu , Yu-fei Li , Xiao-tong Zhao , Yong-hui Li , Rui-si Cui
{"title":"Inhibition of the basolateral amygdala to prelimbic cortex pathway enhances risk-taking during risky decision-making shock task in rats","authors":"Ni Liu ,&nbsp;Yu-fei Li ,&nbsp;Xiao-tong Zhao ,&nbsp;Yong-hui Li ,&nbsp;Rui-si Cui","doi":"10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.114819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many animal studies have explored decision-making under risk and punishment, particularly regarding potential rewards, but less focus has been placed on contexts involving net losses. Understanding decision-making under net loss conditions can shed light on the neural mechanisms involved. The basolateral amygdala to prelimbic cortex (BLA→PL) pathway is crucial for risky decision-making. In this study, we investigated how rats make decisions under no-reward but shock conditions, specifically examining the role of the BLA→PL pathway. In the risky decision-making shock task (RDST), rats chose between a “small/certain” lever, which consistently delivered one pellet, and a “large/risky” lever, offering variable rewards with a 50 % probability of reward and a 50 % probability of 1-s foot-shock. The results showed that the shock condition decreased the preference for the large/risky lever, despite increasing rewards. Importantly, inhibiting the BLA→PL pathway significantly increased the selection of the “large/risky” lever compared to the control. Although rats in the clozapine N-oxide (CNO) group did not exhibit significant differences in response latency between levers, they exhibited heightened sensitivity to rewards and losses, suggesting that the BLA→PL pathway affects the encoding of the relationship between aversive stimuli and reward-seeking. Overall, these results provide valuable insights into the neural mechanisms of risk-taking, particularly regarding how inhibition in the BLA→PL pathway can influence reward processing and decision-making under no-reward but shock conditions, with implications for understanding risk-related psychiatric disorders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20201,"journal":{"name":"Physiology & Behavior","volume":"292 ","pages":"Article 114819"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiology & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031938425000216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many animal studies have explored decision-making under risk and punishment, particularly regarding potential rewards, but less focus has been placed on contexts involving net losses. Understanding decision-making under net loss conditions can shed light on the neural mechanisms involved. The basolateral amygdala to prelimbic cortex (BLA→PL) pathway is crucial for risky decision-making. In this study, we investigated how rats make decisions under no-reward but shock conditions, specifically examining the role of the BLA→PL pathway. In the risky decision-making shock task (RDST), rats chose between a “small/certain” lever, which consistently delivered one pellet, and a “large/risky” lever, offering variable rewards with a 50 % probability of reward and a 50 % probability of 1-s foot-shock. The results showed that the shock condition decreased the preference for the large/risky lever, despite increasing rewards. Importantly, inhibiting the BLA→PL pathway significantly increased the selection of the “large/risky” lever compared to the control. Although rats in the clozapine N-oxide (CNO) group did not exhibit significant differences in response latency between levers, they exhibited heightened sensitivity to rewards and losses, suggesting that the BLA→PL pathway affects the encoding of the relationship between aversive stimuli and reward-seeking. Overall, these results provide valuable insights into the neural mechanisms of risk-taking, particularly regarding how inhibition in the BLA→PL pathway can influence reward processing and decision-making under no-reward but shock conditions, with implications for understanding risk-related psychiatric disorders.
基底外侧杏仁核至前边缘皮质通路的抑制增强大鼠风险决策休克任务中的冒险行为。
许多动物研究探讨了在风险和惩罚下的决策,特别是关于潜在的奖励,但很少关注涉及净损失的情况。理解净损失条件下的决策可以揭示相关的神经机制。基底外侧杏仁核到前边缘皮层(BLA→PL)通路对风险决策至关重要。在这项研究中,我们研究了大鼠在无奖励但有电击的条件下如何做出决策,特别是研究了BLA→PL通路的作用。在风险决策冲击任务(RDST)中,大鼠在“小/确定”杠杆和“大/风险”杠杆之间进行选择,“小/确定”杠杆始终提供一个颗粒,而“大/风险”杠杆提供可变奖励,奖励概率为50%,脚震荡概率为50%。结果表明,尽管奖励增加,但冲击条件降低了对大/风险杠杆的偏好。重要的是,与对照组相比,抑制BLA→PL途径显著增加了“大/风险”杠杆的选择。虽然氯氮平n -氧化物(CNO)组的大鼠在不同杠杆之间的反应潜伏期没有显著差异,但它们对奖励和损失表现出更高的敏感性,这表明BLA→PL通路影响了厌恶刺激和寻求奖励之间关系的编码。总的来说,这些结果为冒险的神经机制提供了有价值的见解,特别是关于BLA→PL通路的抑制如何影响无奖励但休克条件下的奖励加工和决策,对理解风险相关精神疾病具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiology & Behavior
Physiology & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
274
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Physiology & Behavior is aimed at the causal physiological mechanisms of behavior and its modulation by environmental factors. The journal invites original reports in the broad area of behavioral and cognitive neuroscience, in which at least one variable is physiological and the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. The range of subjects includes behavioral neuroendocrinology, psychoneuroimmunology, learning and memory, ingestion, social behavior, and studies related to the mechanisms of psychopathology. Contemporary reviews and theoretical articles are welcomed and the Editors invite such proposals from interested authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信