Detecting noncredible symptomology in ADHD evaluations using machine learning.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
John-Christopher A Finley, Matthew S Phillips, Jason R Soble, Violeta J Rodriguez
{"title":"Detecting noncredible symptomology in ADHD evaluations using machine learning.","authors":"John-Christopher A Finley, Matthew S Phillips, Jason R Soble, Violeta J Rodriguez","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2458547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnostic evaluations for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are becoming increasingly complicated by the number of adults who fabricate or exaggerate symptoms. Novel methods are needed to improve the assessment process required to detect these noncredible symptoms. The present study investigated whether unsupervised machine learning (ML) could serve as one such method, and detect noncredible symptom reporting in adults undergoing ADHD evaluations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were 623 adults who underwent outpatient ADHD evaluations. Patients' scores from symptom validity tests embedded in two self-report questionnaires were examined in an unsupervised ML model. The model, called \"sidClustering,\" is based on a clustering and random forest algorithm. The model synthesized the raw scores (without cutoffs) from the symptom validity tests into an unspecified number of groups. The groups were then compared to predetermined ratings of credible versus noncredible symptom reporting. The noncredible symptom ratings were defined by either two or three or more symptom validity test elevations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model identified two groups that were significantly (<i>p</i> < .001) and meaningfully associated with the predetermined ratings of credible or noncredible symptom reporting, regardless of the number of elevations used to define noncredible reporting. The validity test assessing overreporting of various types of psychiatric symptoms was most influential in determining group membership; but symptom validity tests regarding ADHD-specific symptoms were also contributory.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that unsupervised ML can effectively identify noncredible symptom reporting using scores from multiple symptom validity tests without predetermined cutoffs. The ML-derived groups also support the use of two validity test elevations to identify noncredible symptom reporting. Collectively, these findings serve as a proof of concept that unsupervised ML can improve the process of detecting noncredible symptoms during ADHD evaluations. With additional research, unsupervised ML may become a useful supplementary tool for quickly and accurately detecting noncredible symptoms during these evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1015-1025"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2458547","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Diagnostic evaluations for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are becoming increasingly complicated by the number of adults who fabricate or exaggerate symptoms. Novel methods are needed to improve the assessment process required to detect these noncredible symptoms. The present study investigated whether unsupervised machine learning (ML) could serve as one such method, and detect noncredible symptom reporting in adults undergoing ADHD evaluations.

Method: Participants were 623 adults who underwent outpatient ADHD evaluations. Patients' scores from symptom validity tests embedded in two self-report questionnaires were examined in an unsupervised ML model. The model, called "sidClustering," is based on a clustering and random forest algorithm. The model synthesized the raw scores (without cutoffs) from the symptom validity tests into an unspecified number of groups. The groups were then compared to predetermined ratings of credible versus noncredible symptom reporting. The noncredible symptom ratings were defined by either two or three or more symptom validity test elevations.

Results: The model identified two groups that were significantly (p < .001) and meaningfully associated with the predetermined ratings of credible or noncredible symptom reporting, regardless of the number of elevations used to define noncredible reporting. The validity test assessing overreporting of various types of psychiatric symptoms was most influential in determining group membership; but symptom validity tests regarding ADHD-specific symptoms were also contributory.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that unsupervised ML can effectively identify noncredible symptom reporting using scores from multiple symptom validity tests without predetermined cutoffs. The ML-derived groups also support the use of two validity test elevations to identify noncredible symptom reporting. Collectively, these findings serve as a proof of concept that unsupervised ML can improve the process of detecting noncredible symptoms during ADHD evaluations. With additional research, unsupervised ML may become a useful supplementary tool for quickly and accurately detecting noncredible symptoms during these evaluations.

使用机器学习检测ADHD评估中不可信的症状。
导读:由于捏造或夸大症状的成年人越来越多,对注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的诊断评估变得越来越复杂。需要新的方法来改进检测这些不可信症状所需的评估过程。本研究调查了无监督机器学习(ML)是否可以作为一种这样的方法,并在接受ADHD评估的成年人中检测不可信的症状报告。方法:参与者是623名接受了门诊ADHD评估的成年人。在一个无监督ML模型中检查了嵌入在两份自我报告问卷中的患者症状效度测试的分数。这个被称为“sidClustering”的模型是基于聚类和随机森林算法的。该模型将症状有效性测试的原始分数(没有截止值)合成为未指定数量的组。然后将这些组与预先确定的可信与不可信症状报告进行比较。不可信症状评分由两次或三次或更多的症状效度测试升高来定义。结论:这些发现表明,无监督的机器学习可以有效地识别不可信的症状报告,使用多个症状效度测试的分数,没有预先确定的截止点。ml衍生组也支持使用两个效度测试升高来识别不可信的症状报告。总的来说,这些发现证明了一个概念,即无监督机器学习可以改善ADHD评估过程中检测不可信症状的过程。随着进一步的研究,无监督机器学习可能成为一种有用的补充工具,可以在这些评估过程中快速准确地检测不可信的症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信