Francisca Tatiana Pereira Gondim , Eduardo Arrais Rocha , Neiberg de Alcantara Lima , Rosa Livia Freitas de Almeida , David Martin , Marcelo de Paula Martins Monteiro , Aloisio Sales Barbosa Gondim , Davi Sales Pereira Gondim , Pedro Sales Pereira Gondim , Roberto da Justa Pires Neto
{"title":"Long term outcomes post-ICD in Chagas cardiomyopathy and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A comparative analysis","authors":"Francisca Tatiana Pereira Gondim , Eduardo Arrais Rocha , Neiberg de Alcantara Lima , Rosa Livia Freitas de Almeida , David Martin , Marcelo de Paula Martins Monteiro , Aloisio Sales Barbosa Gondim , Davi Sales Pereira Gondim , Pedro Sales Pereira Gondim , Roberto da Justa Pires Neto","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.132998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCM) is a significant cause of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although, implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) have been used for all forms of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), studies on ICD efficacy in CCM are scarce.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The present study aims to compare the long-term outcomes, mortality rates, and the occurrence of tachycardia therapies after ICD implantation in patients with CCM and NICM.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study was conducted over an 18-year period beginning in 2003. The primary outcome of this study was the difference in appropriate ICD therapies and mortality among patients in a single center receiving implant for CCM or NICM management. As a secondary outcome, we compared inappropriate shocks, presence of incessant ventricular tachycardia/electrical storm, and SCD.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 207 patients (117 with CCM and 90 with NICM). The median follow-up time was 61 months [25–121] in the CCM group and 56.5 months [23–119] in the NICD group. During follow up, 39.3 % (46 patients) died in the CCM group and 5.6 % (5 patients) in the NICM group. Appropriate shocks, appropriate therapies, ATP, electrical storm and inappropriate shocks were all more frequent in patients with CCM.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CCM patients experienced higher mortality and more frequent appropriate ICD interventions compared to patients with NICM. ICDs appear effective and safe for long-term management in CCM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"423 ","pages":"Article 132998"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527325000415","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCM) is a significant cause of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although, implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) have been used for all forms of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), studies on ICD efficacy in CCM are scarce.
Objective
The present study aims to compare the long-term outcomes, mortality rates, and the occurrence of tachycardia therapies after ICD implantation in patients with CCM and NICM.
Methods
The study was conducted over an 18-year period beginning in 2003. The primary outcome of this study was the difference in appropriate ICD therapies and mortality among patients in a single center receiving implant for CCM or NICM management. As a secondary outcome, we compared inappropriate shocks, presence of incessant ventricular tachycardia/electrical storm, and SCD.
Results
The study included 207 patients (117 with CCM and 90 with NICM). The median follow-up time was 61 months [25–121] in the CCM group and 56.5 months [23–119] in the NICD group. During follow up, 39.3 % (46 patients) died in the CCM group and 5.6 % (5 patients) in the NICM group. Appropriate shocks, appropriate therapies, ATP, electrical storm and inappropriate shocks were all more frequent in patients with CCM.
Conclusion
CCM patients experienced higher mortality and more frequent appropriate ICD interventions compared to patients with NICM. ICDs appear effective and safe for long-term management in CCM.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers.
In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.