Effect of artificial intelligence-aided differentiation of adenomatous and non-adenomatous colorectal polyps at CT colonography on radiologists' therapy management.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s00330-025-11371-0
Sergio Grosu, Matthias P Fabritius, Michael Winkelmann, Daniel Puhr-Westerheide, Maria Ingenerf, Stefan Maurus, Anno Graser, Christian Schulz, Thomas Knösel, Clemens C Cyran, Jens Ricke, Philipp M Kazmierczak, Michael Ingrisch, Philipp Wesp
{"title":"Effect of artificial intelligence-aided differentiation of adenomatous and non-adenomatous colorectal polyps at CT colonography on radiologists' therapy management.","authors":"Sergio Grosu, Matthias P Fabritius, Michael Winkelmann, Daniel Puhr-Westerheide, Maria Ingenerf, Stefan Maurus, Anno Graser, Christian Schulz, Thomas Knösel, Clemens C Cyran, Jens Ricke, Philipp M Kazmierczak, Michael Ingrisch, Philipp Wesp","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11371-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Adenomatous colorectal polyps require endoscopic resection, as opposed to non-adenomatous hyperplastic colorectal polyps. This study aims to evaluate the effect of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted differentiation of adenomatous and non-adenomatous colorectal polyps at CT colonography on radiologists' therapy management.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Five board-certified radiologists evaluated CT colonography images with colorectal polyps of all sizes and morphologies retrospectively and decided whether the depicted polyps required endoscopic resection. After a primary unassisted reading based on current guidelines, a second reading with access to the classification of a radiomics-based random-forest AI-model labelling each polyp as \"non-adenomatous\" or \"adenomatous\" was performed. Performance was evaluated using polyp histopathology as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>77 polyps in 59 patients comprising 118 polyp image series (47% supine position, 53% prone position) were evaluated unassisted and AI-assisted by five independent board-certified radiologists, resulting in a total of 1180 readings (subsequent polypectomy: yes or no). AI-assisted readings had higher accuracy (76% +/- 1% vs. 84% +/- 1%), sensitivity (78% +/- 6% vs. 85% +/- 1%), and specificity (73% +/- 8% vs. 82% +/- 2%) in selecting polyps eligible for polypectomy (p < 0.001). Inter-reader agreement was improved in the AI-assisted readings (Fleiss' kappa 0.69 vs. 0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-based characterisation of colorectal polyps at CT colonography as a second reader might enable a more precise selection of polyps eligible for subsequent endoscopic resection. However, further studies are needed to confirm this finding and histopathologic polyp evaluation is still mandatory.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question This is the first study evaluating the impact of AI-based polyp classification in CT colonography on radiologists' therapy management. Findings Compared with unassisted reading, AI-assisted reading had higher accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in selecting polyps eligible for polypectomy. Clinical relevance Integrating an AI tool for colorectal polyp classification in CT colonography could further improve radiologists' therapy recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"4091-4099"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11371-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Adenomatous colorectal polyps require endoscopic resection, as opposed to non-adenomatous hyperplastic colorectal polyps. This study aims to evaluate the effect of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted differentiation of adenomatous and non-adenomatous colorectal polyps at CT colonography on radiologists' therapy management.

Materials and methods: Five board-certified radiologists evaluated CT colonography images with colorectal polyps of all sizes and morphologies retrospectively and decided whether the depicted polyps required endoscopic resection. After a primary unassisted reading based on current guidelines, a second reading with access to the classification of a radiomics-based random-forest AI-model labelling each polyp as "non-adenomatous" or "adenomatous" was performed. Performance was evaluated using polyp histopathology as the reference standard.

Results: 77 polyps in 59 patients comprising 118 polyp image series (47% supine position, 53% prone position) were evaluated unassisted and AI-assisted by five independent board-certified radiologists, resulting in a total of 1180 readings (subsequent polypectomy: yes or no). AI-assisted readings had higher accuracy (76% +/- 1% vs. 84% +/- 1%), sensitivity (78% +/- 6% vs. 85% +/- 1%), and specificity (73% +/- 8% vs. 82% +/- 2%) in selecting polyps eligible for polypectomy (p < 0.001). Inter-reader agreement was improved in the AI-assisted readings (Fleiss' kappa 0.69 vs. 0.92).

Conclusion: AI-based characterisation of colorectal polyps at CT colonography as a second reader might enable a more precise selection of polyps eligible for subsequent endoscopic resection. However, further studies are needed to confirm this finding and histopathologic polyp evaluation is still mandatory.

Key points: Question This is the first study evaluating the impact of AI-based polyp classification in CT colonography on radiologists' therapy management. Findings Compared with unassisted reading, AI-assisted reading had higher accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in selecting polyps eligible for polypectomy. Clinical relevance Integrating an AI tool for colorectal polyp classification in CT colonography could further improve radiologists' therapy recommendations.

人工智能辅助CT结肠镜鉴别腺瘤性和非腺瘤性结肠息肉对放射科医师治疗管理的影响。
目的:与非腺瘤性增生性结直肠息肉相比,腺瘤性结直肠息肉需要内镜切除。本研究旨在评估人工智能(AI)辅助CT结肠镜鉴别腺瘤性和非腺瘤性结直肠息肉对放射科医生治疗管理的影响。材料和方法:五名委员会认证的放射科医生回顾性评估了CT结肠镜成像的各种大小和形态的结肠息肉,并决定所描绘的息肉是否需要内镜切除。在根据当前指南进行首次无辅助阅读后,使用基于放射组学的随机森林ai模型进行第二次阅读,将每个息肉标记为“非腺瘤”或“腺瘤”。以息肉组织病理学为参考标准评价其性能。结果:59例患者的77个息肉,包括118个息肉图像系列(47%仰卧位,53%俯卧位),由5名独立的委员会认证放射科医生在无辅助和人工智能辅助下进行评估,共进行了1180次读数(随后的息肉切除术:是或否)。人工智能辅助读数在选择适合息肉切除术的息肉时具有更高的准确性(76% +/- 1% vs. 84% +/- 1%),灵敏度(78% +/- 6% vs. 85% +/- 1%)和特异性(73% +/- 8% vs. 82% +/- 2%) (p结论:CT结肠镜下基于人工智能的结肠直肠息肉特征作为第二阅读器可能能够更精确地选择适合随后内镜切除的息肉。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实这一发现,组织病理学息肉评估仍然是强制性的。本研究首次评估了CT结肠镜中基于人工智能的息肉分类对放射科医生治疗管理的影响。与非辅助阅读相比,人工智能辅助阅读在选择适合息肉切除术的息肉方面具有更高的准确性、敏感性和特异性。在CT结肠镜检查中整合人工智能结肠息肉分类工具,可以进一步提高放射科医生的治疗建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信