Type B ankle fractures with additional medium-sized posterior fragment: mid-term functional and radiological outcome after fixation versus no fixation of the posterior fragment.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
A L Franx, J M Hoogendoorn, E L L Twiss, P Krijnen, S M Verhage
{"title":"Type B ankle fractures with additional medium-sized posterior fragment: mid-term functional and radiological outcome after fixation versus no fixation of the posterior fragment.","authors":"A L Franx, J M Hoogendoorn, E L L Twiss, P Krijnen, S M Verhage","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02696-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Guidelines for treatment of medium-sized posterior fragments in trimalleolar fractures are scarce and show varying advice. Recent trials comparing fixation and no fixation of posterior fragments, show no difference in outcomes one year postoperatively. This study compares functional outcome and development of osteoarthritis in patients with fixation of a posterior malleolar fracture to patients without fixation of the posterior malleolus fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients operated for type B ankle fractures with medium-sized (5-25% of joint surface) posterior malleolar fragments in a Dutch level-1 trauma center between 2014 and 2018. ORIF of posterior fragments (FIX) was compared to no fixation (NO-FIX). Choice of treatment was based on the surgeon's preference. Functional outcome was assessed using the AOFAS-score, OMAS-score and VAS-pain. Development of osteoarthritis was assessed on radiographs. A linear regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for worse functional outcome and osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>27 patients were included in the FIX group and 58 patients in the NO-FIX group. After a median follow-up of 74 months (range 50-108), no difference was observed for functional outcome and pain (median AOFAS 90 vs. 95, OMAS 85 vs. 88, VAS-pain 1 vs. 1; all p > 0.05). Osteoarthritis rates were comparable (grade ≥ 2: 22% in FIX vs. 21% in NO-FIX, p = 0.87). Median fragment size was 15.7% versus 13.6% of the tibial articular surface after FIX and NO-FIX respectively. Median postoperative step-off on radiograph was 0.0 mm after FIX and 0.8 mm after NO-FIX (p = 0.20). Complication rates, including infection, secondary operation and hardware removal, were comparable. Postoperative step-off > 1 mm increased the risk of osteoarthritis (odds ratio 3.9, 95% CI 1.2-12.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The value of fixation of medium-sized posterior fragments in type B ankle fractures seems limited after mid-term follow-up, although functional impairment caused by osteoarthritis might develop in the long-term. Because postoperative step-off > 1 mm increases the risk of osteoarthritis, restoration of the tibial plafond seems essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02696-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Guidelines for treatment of medium-sized posterior fragments in trimalleolar fractures are scarce and show varying advice. Recent trials comparing fixation and no fixation of posterior fragments, show no difference in outcomes one year postoperatively. This study compares functional outcome and development of osteoarthritis in patients with fixation of a posterior malleolar fracture to patients without fixation of the posterior malleolus fracture.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients operated for type B ankle fractures with medium-sized (5-25% of joint surface) posterior malleolar fragments in a Dutch level-1 trauma center between 2014 and 2018. ORIF of posterior fragments (FIX) was compared to no fixation (NO-FIX). Choice of treatment was based on the surgeon's preference. Functional outcome was assessed using the AOFAS-score, OMAS-score and VAS-pain. Development of osteoarthritis was assessed on radiographs. A linear regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for worse functional outcome and osteoarthritis.

Results: 27 patients were included in the FIX group and 58 patients in the NO-FIX group. After a median follow-up of 74 months (range 50-108), no difference was observed for functional outcome and pain (median AOFAS 90 vs. 95, OMAS 85 vs. 88, VAS-pain 1 vs. 1; all p > 0.05). Osteoarthritis rates were comparable (grade ≥ 2: 22% in FIX vs. 21% in NO-FIX, p = 0.87). Median fragment size was 15.7% versus 13.6% of the tibial articular surface after FIX and NO-FIX respectively. Median postoperative step-off on radiograph was 0.0 mm after FIX and 0.8 mm after NO-FIX (p = 0.20). Complication rates, including infection, secondary operation and hardware removal, were comparable. Postoperative step-off > 1 mm increased the risk of osteoarthritis (odds ratio 3.9, 95% CI 1.2-12.7).

Conclusion: The value of fixation of medium-sized posterior fragments in type B ankle fractures seems limited after mid-term follow-up, although functional impairment caused by osteoarthritis might develop in the long-term. Because postoperative step-off > 1 mm increases the risk of osteoarthritis, restoration of the tibial plafond seems essential.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信