Accuracy of GFAP and UCH-L1 in predicting brain abnormalities on CT scans after mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Armin Karamian, Hana Farzaneh, Masoud Khoshnoodi, Nazanin Maleki, Saurabh Rohatgi, Jeremy N Ford, Javier M Romero
{"title":"Accuracy of GFAP and UCH-L1 in predicting brain abnormalities on CT scans after mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Armin Karamian, Hana Farzaneh, Masoud Khoshnoodi, Nazanin Maleki, Saurabh Rohatgi, Jeremy N Ford, Javier M Romero","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02697-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. In recent years, blood biomarkers including glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) have shown a promising ability to detect head CT abnormalities following TBI. This review aims to combine the existing research on GFAP and UCH-L1 biomarkers and examine how well they can predict abnormal CT results after mild TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024556264). PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane electronic databases were searched. We reviewed 37 full-text articles for eligibility and included 14 in our systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies reported data for GFAP. The optimal cutoff of GFAP was 65.1 pg/mL with a sensitivity of 76% (95% CI 37 ̶ 95) and a specificity of 74% (95% CI 39 ̶ 93). In patients with GCS 13 ̶ 15 the optimal cutoff was 68.5 pg/mL, showing a sensitivity of 75% (95% CI 17 ̶ 98), and a specificity of 73% (95% CI 20 ̶ 97). Seven studies provided data on UCH-L1. The optimal cutoff was 225 pg/mL, with a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI 50 ̶ 97) and a specificity of 51% (95% CI 19 ̶ 83). In patients with GCS 13 ̶ 15, the optimal cutoff was 237.7 pg/mL, with a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI 74 ̶ 96), and a specificity of 36% (95% CI 29 ̶ 44). Modeling the diagnostic performance of GFAP showed that in adult patients with GCS 13-15 for ruling out CT abnormalities, at the threshold of 4 pg/mL, the optimal diagnostic accuracy was achieved with a sensitivity of 98% (95% CI 94-99) and (negative predictive value) NPV of 97%. For UCH-L1, the optimal diagnostic accuracy for ruling out intracranial abnormalities in adults with GCS 13-15 was achieved at the threshold of 64 pg/mL, with a sensitivity of 99% (95% CI 92-100) and NPV of 99%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Present results suggest that GFAP and UCH-L1 have the clinical potential for screening mild TBI patients for intracranial abnormalities on head CT scans.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02697-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. In recent years, blood biomarkers including glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) have shown a promising ability to detect head CT abnormalities following TBI. This review aims to combine the existing research on GFAP and UCH-L1 biomarkers and examine how well they can predict abnormal CT results after mild TBI.

Methods: Our study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024556264). PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane electronic databases were searched. We reviewed 37 full-text articles for eligibility and included 14 in our systematic review and meta-analysis.

Results: Thirteen studies reported data for GFAP. The optimal cutoff of GFAP was 65.1 pg/mL with a sensitivity of 76% (95% CI 37 ̶ 95) and a specificity of 74% (95% CI 39 ̶ 93). In patients with GCS 13 ̶ 15 the optimal cutoff was 68.5 pg/mL, showing a sensitivity of 75% (95% CI 17 ̶ 98), and a specificity of 73% (95% CI 20 ̶ 97). Seven studies provided data on UCH-L1. The optimal cutoff was 225 pg/mL, with a sensitivity of 86% (95% CI 50 ̶ 97) and a specificity of 51% (95% CI 19 ̶ 83). In patients with GCS 13 ̶ 15, the optimal cutoff was 237.7 pg/mL, with a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI 74 ̶ 96), and a specificity of 36% (95% CI 29 ̶ 44). Modeling the diagnostic performance of GFAP showed that in adult patients with GCS 13-15 for ruling out CT abnormalities, at the threshold of 4 pg/mL, the optimal diagnostic accuracy was achieved with a sensitivity of 98% (95% CI 94-99) and (negative predictive value) NPV of 97%. For UCH-L1, the optimal diagnostic accuracy for ruling out intracranial abnormalities in adults with GCS 13-15 was achieved at the threshold of 64 pg/mL, with a sensitivity of 99% (95% CI 92-100) and NPV of 99%.

Conclusion: Present results suggest that GFAP and UCH-L1 have the clinical potential for screening mild TBI patients for intracranial abnormalities on head CT scans.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信