Ultra-high-resolution CT of the temporal bone before cochlear implantation for pre-operative prediction of chorda tympani nerve management and round window access.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Fatma Boubaker, Ulysse Puel, Sara Imbs, Gabriela Hossu, Alain Blum, Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira, Michael Eliezer, Cécile Parietti-Winkler, Romain Gillet
{"title":"Ultra-high-resolution CT of the temporal bone before cochlear implantation for pre-operative prediction of chorda tympani nerve management and round window access.","authors":"Fatma Boubaker, Ulysse Puel, Sara Imbs, Gabriela Hossu, Alain Blum, Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira, Michael Eliezer, Cécile Parietti-Winkler, Romain Gillet","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09231-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>To evaluate various anatomical parameters and their relationship to chorda tympani nerve (CTN) injury and round window (RW) access during cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ultra-high-resolution CT images of 66 patients were retrospectively reviewed and compared with operative reports. The facial recess and the round window were analyzed, mainly using the chorda-facial angle (CFA), the width of the facial recess, the CTN-tympanic annulus distance, the RW-mastoid portion of the facial nerve angle, and the type of RW.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surgical management of the CTN was uneventful in 59 patients, whereas surgical difficulty occurred in 7, with significant differences only between the CTN-tympanic annulus distance and the RW-mastoid portion of the facial nerve angle (P ≤ 0.04). The optimal cut-off values for predicting surgical difficulty were 0.95 mm and 19°, respectively, with sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of 0.71, 0.67, 0.2 and 0.95 for the distance, and 0.57, 0.95, 0.57 and 0.94 for the angle, respectively. The RW was accessible in 51 patients and cochleostomy was performed in 15 patients, without significant difference between radiological parameters, especially concerning the CFA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A CTN-tympanic annulus distance greater than 0.95 mm may help to predict a non-negligible risk of CTN surgical damage, and a RW thinner than 1.85 mm may require exploring the possibility of a cochleostomy approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"3065-3073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09231-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: To evaluate various anatomical parameters and their relationship to chorda tympani nerve (CTN) injury and round window (RW) access during cochlear implantation.

Materials and methods: Ultra-high-resolution CT images of 66 patients were retrospectively reviewed and compared with operative reports. The facial recess and the round window were analyzed, mainly using the chorda-facial angle (CFA), the width of the facial recess, the CTN-tympanic annulus distance, the RW-mastoid portion of the facial nerve angle, and the type of RW.

Results: Surgical management of the CTN was uneventful in 59 patients, whereas surgical difficulty occurred in 7, with significant differences only between the CTN-tympanic annulus distance and the RW-mastoid portion of the facial nerve angle (P ≤ 0.04). The optimal cut-off values for predicting surgical difficulty were 0.95 mm and 19°, respectively, with sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of 0.71, 0.67, 0.2 and 0.95 for the distance, and 0.57, 0.95, 0.57 and 0.94 for the angle, respectively. The RW was accessible in 51 patients and cochleostomy was performed in 15 patients, without significant difference between radiological parameters, especially concerning the CFA.

Conclusion: A CTN-tympanic annulus distance greater than 0.95 mm may help to predict a non-negligible risk of CTN surgical damage, and a RW thinner than 1.85 mm may require exploring the possibility of a cochleostomy approach.

人工耳蜗植入前颞骨超高分辨率CT术前预测鼓室索神经管理及圆窗通路。
背景与目的:探讨人工耳蜗植入过程中各种解剖参数与鼓室索神经(CTN)损伤及圆窗通路的关系。材料与方法:回顾性分析66例患者的超高分辨率CT图像,并与手术报告进行比较。对面神经隐窝及圆窗进行分析,主要依据面神经索面角(CFA)、面神经隐窝宽度、ctn -鼓室环距离、面神经角的RW-乳突部分及RW类型。结果:59例CTN手术处理顺利,7例出现手术困难,仅CTN-鼓室环距离与面神经角rw -乳突部分差异有统计学意义(P≤0.04)。预测手术难度的最佳临界值分别为0.95 mm和19°,距离的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为0.71、0.67、0.2和0.95,角度的预测值分别为0.57、0.95、0.57和0.94。51例患者行耳蜗造口术,15例患者行耳蜗造口术,影像学参数无显著性差异,尤其是CFA。结论:CTN-鼓室环距离大于0.95 mm可能有助于预测CTN手术损伤的不可忽略的风险,RW小于1.85 mm可能需要探索耳蜗造口入路的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信