Impact of a personalized, strike early and strong lipid-lowering approach on LDL-cholesterol levels and cardiovascular outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Giuseppe Patti, Luca Cumitini, Manuel Bosco, Alessandra Marengo, Domenico D'Amario, Marco Mennuni, Martina Solli, Leonardo Grisafi
{"title":"Impact of a personalized, strike early and strong lipid-lowering approach on LDL-cholesterol levels and cardiovascular outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction.","authors":"Giuseppe Patti, Luca Cumitini, Manuel Bosco, Alessandra Marengo, Domenico D'Amario, Marco Mennuni, Martina Solli, Leonardo Grisafi","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Considering the lack of evidence, we evaluated the impact on cardiovascular outcome of the systematic introduction in our institution of a personalized strike early and strong (SES) approach for lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (MI).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from 500 consecutive patients hospitalized across three periods: Period A (N=198, January-June 2019), when the LDL-C goal was <70 mg/dL and a stepwise LLT approach was recommended; Period B (N=180, January-June 2021), when the LDL-C goal was <55 mg/dL and a stepwise approach was recommended; Period C (N=122, January-June 2023), when the LDL-C goal was <55 mg/dL and our SES protocol was implemented. Primary endpoints were achievement of the LDL-C goal during follow-up and one-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Compared to the other periods, in Period C there was a higher use of potent statins, alone or in combination with ezetimibe, and of PCSK9 inhibitors at discharge. This translated into higher achievement of the LDL-C goal (83% vs 55% in Period A and 43% in Period B; p<0.001) and reduced incidence of MACE (3% vs 12% and 11%; p=0.026). MACE rates were lowest in patients with early and sustained LDL-C <55 mg/dL and in those achieving both LDL-C <55 mg/dL and ≥50% LDL-C reduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The systematic introduction of a personalized, SES strategy for LLT in patients with acute MI led to greater achievement of LDL-C goal and lower risk of MACE at one year vs the stepwise approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Considering the lack of evidence, we evaluated the impact on cardiovascular outcome of the systematic introduction in our institution of a personalized strike early and strong (SES) approach for lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (MI).

Methods and results: We retrospectively analyzed data from 500 consecutive patients hospitalized across three periods: Period A (N=198, January-June 2019), when the LDL-C goal was <70 mg/dL and a stepwise LLT approach was recommended; Period B (N=180, January-June 2021), when the LDL-C goal was <55 mg/dL and a stepwise approach was recommended; Period C (N=122, January-June 2023), when the LDL-C goal was <55 mg/dL and our SES protocol was implemented. Primary endpoints were achievement of the LDL-C goal during follow-up and one-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Compared to the other periods, in Period C there was a higher use of potent statins, alone or in combination with ezetimibe, and of PCSK9 inhibitors at discharge. This translated into higher achievement of the LDL-C goal (83% vs 55% in Period A and 43% in Period B; p<0.001) and reduced incidence of MACE (3% vs 12% and 11%; p=0.026). MACE rates were lowest in patients with early and sustained LDL-C <55 mg/dL and in those achieving both LDL-C <55 mg/dL and ≥50% LDL-C reduction.

Conclusion: The systematic introduction of a personalized, SES strategy for LLT in patients with acute MI led to greater achievement of LDL-C goal and lower risk of MACE at one year vs the stepwise approach.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
14.10%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy (EHJ-CVP) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published in English, specifically dedicated to clinical cardiovascular pharmacology. EHJ-CVP publishes original articles focusing on clinical research involving both new and established drugs and methods, along with meta-analyses and topical reviews. The journal's primary aim is to enhance the pharmacological treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease by interpreting and integrating new scientific developments in this field. While the emphasis is on clinical topics, EHJ-CVP also considers basic research articles from fields such as physiology and molecular biology that contribute to the understanding of cardiovascular drug therapy. These may include articles related to new drug development and evaluation, the physiological and pharmacological basis of drug action, metabolism, drug interactions, and side effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信