Efficacy of General Magnetic Therapy and Motor-Evoked Potential-Guided Precision Magnetic Therapy in Patients with Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
British journal of hospital medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-24 Epub Date: 2025-01-17 DOI:10.12968/hmed.2024.0532
Hongzhe Xu, Zhangji Zhu, Yinan Lv, Jiawei Gong, Yue Duan
{"title":"Efficacy of General Magnetic Therapy and Motor-Evoked Potential-Guided Precision Magnetic Therapy in Patients with Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Hongzhe Xu, Zhangji Zhu, Yinan Lv, Jiawei Gong, Yue Duan","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2024.0532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims/Background</b> Overactive bladder (OAB) is a prevalent chronic condition affecting approximately 12% of adults, with incidence increasing with age. While pharmacological and behavioural therapies are standard treatments, their efficacy is often limited by side effects and poor adherence. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic effects of precision magnetic stimulation guided by motor-evoked potential with general magnetic therapy in patients with OAB. <b>Methods</b> This randomized controlled trial included 45 patients diagnosed with OAB at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University between January 2022 and September 2022. Participants were randomly divided into Group 1 (n = 15) which received bladder training (BT) alone, Group 2 (n = 15) received BT combined with general magnetic therapy, and Group 3 (n = 15) received BT combined with precision magnetic therapy. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), urination diaries, initial bladder volume, and maximum bladder volume before and after treatment. <b>Results</b> At the end of the intervention, Groups 2 and 3 demonstrated significant improvements in OABSS scores, urgency of urination, initial bladder volume, and maximum bladder volume compared to Group 1 (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Group 3 exhibited superior urination frequency and initial bladder volume improvements compared to Group 2 (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusion</b> General magnetic therapy combined with BT and precision magnetic therapy combined with BT were more effective than BT alone in treating OAB. While there were no significant differences between the two magnetic stimulation methods in terms of OABSS scores, urgent urination, nocturnal urination, or maximum bladder volume, precision magnetic therapy showed greater efficacy in reducing urination frequency and improving initial bladder volume. These findings suggest that precision magnetic therapy offers an enhanced therapeutic benefit. <b>Clinical Trial Registration</b> Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400087888).</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"86 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0532","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims/Background Overactive bladder (OAB) is a prevalent chronic condition affecting approximately 12% of adults, with incidence increasing with age. While pharmacological and behavioural therapies are standard treatments, their efficacy is often limited by side effects and poor adherence. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic effects of precision magnetic stimulation guided by motor-evoked potential with general magnetic therapy in patients with OAB. Methods This randomized controlled trial included 45 patients diagnosed with OAB at The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University between January 2022 and September 2022. Participants were randomly divided into Group 1 (n = 15) which received bladder training (BT) alone, Group 2 (n = 15) received BT combined with general magnetic therapy, and Group 3 (n = 15) received BT combined with precision magnetic therapy. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), urination diaries, initial bladder volume, and maximum bladder volume before and after treatment. Results At the end of the intervention, Groups 2 and 3 demonstrated significant improvements in OABSS scores, urgency of urination, initial bladder volume, and maximum bladder volume compared to Group 1 (p < 0.05). Group 3 exhibited superior urination frequency and initial bladder volume improvements compared to Group 2 (p < 0.05). Conclusion General magnetic therapy combined with BT and precision magnetic therapy combined with BT were more effective than BT alone in treating OAB. While there were no significant differences between the two magnetic stimulation methods in terms of OABSS scores, urgent urination, nocturnal urination, or maximum bladder volume, precision magnetic therapy showed greater efficacy in reducing urination frequency and improving initial bladder volume. These findings suggest that precision magnetic therapy offers an enhanced therapeutic benefit. Clinical Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400087888).

普通磁疗和运动诱发电位引导的精密磁疗治疗膀胱过度活动症的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
目的/背景膀胱过动症(OAB)是一种常见的慢性疾病,约12%的成年人受其影响,发病率随着年龄的增长而增加。虽然药理学和行为疗法是标准的治疗方法,但它们的疗效往往受到副作用和不良依从性的限制。本研究旨在比较运动诱发电位引导下精确磁刺激与普通磁刺激对OAB患者的治疗效果。方法本随机对照试验纳入2022年1月至2022年9月在浙江中医药大学第二附属医院诊断为OAB的45例患者。随机分为单纯膀胱训练组(n = 15)、膀胱训练联合普通磁疗组(n = 15)和膀胱训练联合精密磁疗组(n = 15)。采用治疗前后膀胱过度活动症状评分(OABSS)、排尿日记、初始膀胱容量、最大膀胱容量评价临床疗效。结果干预结束时,2、3组患者的OABSS评分、尿急、初始膀胱容量、最大膀胱容量均较1组有显著改善(p < 0.05)。与对照组相比,组3的排尿次数和膀胱容量均有所改善(p < 0.05)。结论普通磁疗联合BT及精密磁疗联合BT治疗OAB的疗效优于单纯BT。两种磁刺激方法在OABSS评分、急排尿、夜排尿、最大膀胱容量方面无显著差异,而精密磁刺激在减少排尿次数和改善初始膀胱容量方面效果更佳。这些发现表明,精密磁疗可以提高治疗效果。中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2400087888)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British journal of hospital medicine
British journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training. The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training. British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career. The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信