Effect of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V algorithm and deep learning image reconstruction algorithm on image quality and emphysema quantification in COPD patients under ultra-low-dose conditions.
IF 1.8 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Guangming Ma, Yuequn Dou, Shan Dang, Nan Yu, Yanbing Guo, Dong Han, Chenwang Jin
{"title":"Effect of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V algorithm and deep learning image reconstruction algorithm on image quality and emphysema quantification in COPD patients under ultra-low-dose conditions.","authors":"Guangming Ma, Yuequn Dou, Shan Dang, Nan Yu, Yanbing Guo, Dong Han, Chenwang Jin","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the effect of different reconstruction algorithms (ASIR-V and DLIR) on image quality and emphysema quantification in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients under ultra-low-dose scanning conditions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study with patient consent included 62 COPD patients. Patients were examined by pulmonary function test (PFT), standard-dose CT (SDCT) and ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT). SDCT images were reconstructed with filtered-back-projection (FBP), while ULDCT images were reconstructed using FBP, 30%ASIR-V, 60%ASIR-V, 90%ASIR-V, low-strength (DLIR-L), medium-strength (DLIR-M) and high-strength DLIR (DLIR-H) to form 8 image sets. Images were analyzed using a commercial computer aided diagnosis (CAD) software. Parameters such as image noise, lung volume (LV), emphysema index (EI), mean lung density (MLD), 15th percentile of lung density (PD15) were measured. Two radiologists evaluated tracheal and pulmonary artery image quality using a 5-point scale. Measurements were compared and the correlation between EI and PFT indices was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>ULDCT used 0.46 ± 0.22mSv in radiation dose, 93.8% lower than SDCT (P < 0.001). There was no difference in LV and MLD among image groups (P > 0.05). ULDCT-ASIR-V90% and ULDCT-DLIR-M had similar image noise and EI and PD15 values to SDCT-FBP, and ULDCT-DLIR-M and ULDCT-DLIR-H had similar subjective scores to SDCT-FBP (all P > 0.05). ULDCT-DLIR-M provided the best correlation between EI and the FEV1/FVC and FEV1% indices in PFT, and the lowest deviations with SDCT-FBP in both EI and PD15.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DLIR-M provides the best image quality and emphysema quantification for COPD patients in ULDCT.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Ultra-low-dose CT scanning combined with DLIR-M reconstruction is comparable to standard dose images for quantitative analysis of emphysema and image quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the effect of different reconstruction algorithms (ASIR-V and DLIR) on image quality and emphysema quantification in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients under ultra-low-dose scanning conditions.
Materials and methods: This prospective study with patient consent included 62 COPD patients. Patients were examined by pulmonary function test (PFT), standard-dose CT (SDCT) and ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT). SDCT images were reconstructed with filtered-back-projection (FBP), while ULDCT images were reconstructed using FBP, 30%ASIR-V, 60%ASIR-V, 90%ASIR-V, low-strength (DLIR-L), medium-strength (DLIR-M) and high-strength DLIR (DLIR-H) to form 8 image sets. Images were analyzed using a commercial computer aided diagnosis (CAD) software. Parameters such as image noise, lung volume (LV), emphysema index (EI), mean lung density (MLD), 15th percentile of lung density (PD15) were measured. Two radiologists evaluated tracheal and pulmonary artery image quality using a 5-point scale. Measurements were compared and the correlation between EI and PFT indices was analyzed.
Result: ULDCT used 0.46 ± 0.22mSv in radiation dose, 93.8% lower than SDCT (P < 0.001). There was no difference in LV and MLD among image groups (P > 0.05). ULDCT-ASIR-V90% and ULDCT-DLIR-M had similar image noise and EI and PD15 values to SDCT-FBP, and ULDCT-DLIR-M and ULDCT-DLIR-H had similar subjective scores to SDCT-FBP (all P > 0.05). ULDCT-DLIR-M provided the best correlation between EI and the FEV1/FVC and FEV1% indices in PFT, and the lowest deviations with SDCT-FBP in both EI and PD15.
Conclusion: DLIR-M provides the best image quality and emphysema quantification for COPD patients in ULDCT.
Advances in knowledge: Ultra-low-dose CT scanning combined with DLIR-M reconstruction is comparable to standard dose images for quantitative analysis of emphysema and image quality.
期刊介绍:
BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences.
Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840
- Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks
- ISSN: 0007-1285
- eISSN: 1748-880X
Open Access option