Increasing prehospital tourniquet use attributed to non-indicated use: an 11-year retrospective study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Daniel J Hedger, Mitchell Smith, Natasha Weaver, Jason Bendall, Zsolt J Balogh
{"title":"Increasing prehospital tourniquet use attributed to non-indicated use: an 11-year retrospective study.","authors":"Daniel J Hedger, Mitchell Smith, Natasha Weaver, Jason Bendall, Zsolt J Balogh","doi":"10.1007/s00068-024-02716-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The use of prehospital tourniquets (PHTQ) for haemorrhage control in the civilian trauma population has increased over the past decade with some reports documenting the overuse of the device. The aim of this study was to identify the proportion of PHTQ use that is non-indicated and determine how this proportion is changing over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An 11-year retrospective study was performed at a Level-1 Trauma Centre on all trauma patients admitted with a PHTQ. Local PHTQ guidelines were used to define non-indicated use. Collected variables included patient demographics, injury characteristics, tourniquet application characteristics, prehospital data, emergency department data, and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was non-indicated PHTQ use. The secondary outcome was complications attributed to PHTQ use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 88 PHTQ applications to 88 extremity injuries in 86 patients (n = 86, median (IQR) age 43 (28-57) years, 85% male). PHTQ use was deemed non-indicated in 68 cases (68/88, 77% [95%CI 67-86%]). The proportion of non-indicated PHTQ use increased over the period of the study period (p = 0.03). At least one complication potentially from PHTQ use was seen in 33 patients (33/86, 38%). In patients with prolonged tourniquet time (n = 13), at least one complication from PHTQ use was seen in 11 patients (11/13, 85%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over this 11-year period, we identified that the increase in PHTQ use in civilian trauma is from increasing non-indicated use. Given that complications are associated with unnecessary PHTQ use, the adherence to the guidelines needs to be urgently reinforced.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02716-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The use of prehospital tourniquets (PHTQ) for haemorrhage control in the civilian trauma population has increased over the past decade with some reports documenting the overuse of the device. The aim of this study was to identify the proportion of PHTQ use that is non-indicated and determine how this proportion is changing over time.

Methods: An 11-year retrospective study was performed at a Level-1 Trauma Centre on all trauma patients admitted with a PHTQ. Local PHTQ guidelines were used to define non-indicated use. Collected variables included patient demographics, injury characteristics, tourniquet application characteristics, prehospital data, emergency department data, and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was non-indicated PHTQ use. The secondary outcome was complications attributed to PHTQ use.

Results: There were 88 PHTQ applications to 88 extremity injuries in 86 patients (n = 86, median (IQR) age 43 (28-57) years, 85% male). PHTQ use was deemed non-indicated in 68 cases (68/88, 77% [95%CI 67-86%]). The proportion of non-indicated PHTQ use increased over the period of the study period (p = 0.03). At least one complication potentially from PHTQ use was seen in 33 patients (33/86, 38%). In patients with prolonged tourniquet time (n = 13), at least one complication from PHTQ use was seen in 11 patients (11/13, 85%).

Conclusion: Over this 11-year period, we identified that the increase in PHTQ use in civilian trauma is from increasing non-indicated use. Given that complications are associated with unnecessary PHTQ use, the adherence to the guidelines needs to be urgently reinforced.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

院前止血带使用增加归因于非指征使用:一项11年回顾性研究
目的:院前止血带(PHTQ)用于控制平民创伤人群出血的使用在过去十年中有所增加,一些报告记录了该装置的过度使用。本研究的目的是确定未指明的PHTQ使用比例,并确定该比例如何随时间变化。方法:在一级创伤中心对所有因PHTQ入院的创伤患者进行了为期11年的回顾性研究。使用当地PHTQ指南来定义非适应症使用。收集的变量包括患者人口统计学、损伤特征、止血带应用特征、院前数据、急诊科数据和临床结果。主要终点为非指征PHTQ使用。次要结局是使用PHTQ引起的并发症。结果:88例PHTQ应用于88例肢体损伤患者86例(n = 86,中位(IQR)年龄43(28-57)岁,85%为男性)。68例(68/88,77% [95%CI 67-86%])认为PHTQ使用无指征。在研究期间,非指征PHTQ使用比例增加(p = 0.03)。33例患者(33/ 86,38 %)至少出现一种可能由PHTQ引起的并发症。在止血带时间延长的患者(n = 13)中,11例患者(11/13,85%)至少出现了一种PHTQ并发症。结论:在这11年的时间里,我们发现PHTQ在平民创伤中使用的增加是由于非指证使用的增加。鉴于并发症与不必要的PHTQ使用有关,迫切需要加强对指南的遵守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信