The Evaluation of Urinary HE4, CEA, ProGRP, CYFRA 21-1 and NSE in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Li Zhang, Jing Zhuang, Yuxia Pang, Yinan Song, Xiaofei Li, Kuo Liu, Shuomin Li, Tao Sun
{"title":"The Evaluation of Urinary HE4, CEA, ProGRP, CYFRA 21-1 and NSE in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer.","authors":"Li Zhang, Jing Zhuang, Yuxia Pang, Yinan Song, Xiaofei Li, Kuo Liu, Shuomin Li, Tao Sun","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Urinary proteins are effective tumor biomarkers. Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin-19 fragment 21-1(CYFRA 21-1), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in serum, were proposed as tumor biomarkers of lung cancer. Our aim was to identify the urine protein biomarkers that can distinguish patients with lung cancer from healthy individuals and/or patients with benign lung disease with a high level of sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>These urinary protein concentrations were determined from 212 patients with lung cancer, 80 patients with benign pulmonary conditions, and 100 healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the lung cancer group, urine HE4 median concentration was approximately ten times that in the healthy and/or pulmonary benign disease group; urine CEA, CYFRA21-1, and NSE median concentrations were about eight times, twice, and half as those in the healthy group, respectively. However, the median concentrations of urine ProGRP were almost the same in the healthy, lung benign, and cancer groups. Urine HE4 showed better specificity (94.0% vs 86.0%) and sensibility (72.38% vs 60.65%) than CEA in discriminating patients with lung cancer from healthy controls. A significantly higher ROC area was also obtained with urine HE4 than with CEA (0.87 vs 0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Urine HE4 showed the best diagnostic performance, followed by CEA. The levels of urine HE4 and CEA increased significantly in patients with lung cancer, which had little relationship with pathological type and metastasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8228,"journal":{"name":"Annals of clinical and laboratory science","volume":"54 6","pages":"845-855"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of clinical and laboratory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Urinary proteins are effective tumor biomarkers. Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin-19 fragment 21-1(CYFRA 21-1), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in serum, were proposed as tumor biomarkers of lung cancer. Our aim was to identify the urine protein biomarkers that can distinguish patients with lung cancer from healthy individuals and/or patients with benign lung disease with a high level of sensitivity and specificity.

Methods: These urinary protein concentrations were determined from 212 patients with lung cancer, 80 patients with benign pulmonary conditions, and 100 healthy individuals.

Results: In the lung cancer group, urine HE4 median concentration was approximately ten times that in the healthy and/or pulmonary benign disease group; urine CEA, CYFRA21-1, and NSE median concentrations were about eight times, twice, and half as those in the healthy group, respectively. However, the median concentrations of urine ProGRP were almost the same in the healthy, lung benign, and cancer groups. Urine HE4 showed better specificity (94.0% vs 86.0%) and sensibility (72.38% vs 60.65%) than CEA in discriminating patients with lung cancer from healthy controls. A significantly higher ROC area was also obtained with urine HE4 than with CEA (0.87 vs 0.76).

Conclusions: Urine HE4 showed the best diagnostic performance, followed by CEA. The levels of urine HE4 and CEA increased significantly in patients with lung cancer, which had little relationship with pathological type and metastasis.

尿HE4、CEA、ProGRP、CYFRA 21-1和NSE在肺癌诊断中的价值
目的:尿蛋白是有效的肿瘤生物标志物。人附睾蛋白4 (HE4)、原胃泌素释放肽(ProGRP)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白-19片段21-1(CYFRA 21-1)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)被认为是肺癌的肿瘤生物标志物。我们的目的是鉴定尿液蛋白生物标志物,以高灵敏度和特异性区分肺癌患者与健康个体和/或良性肺部疾病患者。方法:测定了212例肺癌患者、80例良性肺疾病患者和100例健康人的尿蛋白浓度。结果:肺癌组尿HE4中位浓度约为健康和/或肺部良性疾病组的10倍;尿CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE中位浓度分别约为健康组的8倍、2倍和一半。然而,在健康组、肺良性组和肺癌组中,尿ProGRP的中位数浓度几乎相同。尿HE4在鉴别肺癌患者和健康对照方面的特异性(94.0% vs 86.0%)和敏感性(72.38% vs 60.65%)均优于CEA。尿HE4组的ROC面积也明显高于CEA组(0.87 vs 0.76)。结论:尿HE4诊断效果最好,CEA次之。肺癌患者尿HE4、CEA水平明显升高,与病理类型及转移关系不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of clinical and laboratory science
Annals of clinical and laboratory science 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science welcomes manuscripts that report research in clinical science, including pathology, clinical chemistry, biotechnology, molecular biology, cytogenetics, microbiology, immunology, hematology, transfusion medicine, organ and tissue transplantation, therapeutics, toxicology, and clinical informatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信