[Hydrodynamic finite element analysis of biological scaffolds with different pore sizes for cell growth and osteogenic differentiation].

Q3 Medicine
北京大学学报(医学版) Pub Date : 2025-02-18
Yibo Hu, Weijia Lyu, Wei Xia, Yihong Liu
{"title":"[Hydrodynamic finite element analysis of biological scaffolds with different pore sizes for cell growth and osteogenic differentiation].","authors":"Yibo Hu, Weijia Lyu, Wei Xia, Yihong Liu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) Gyroid porous scaffolds were built with identical porosity while varying pore sizes were used by fluid mechanics finite element analysis (FEA) to simulate the <i>in vivo</i> microenvironment. The effects of scaffolds with different pore sizes on cell adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation were evaluated through calculating fluid velocity, wall shear stress, and permeability in the scaffolds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three types of gyroid porous scaffolds, with pore sizes of 400, 600 and 800 μm, were established by nTopology software. Each scaffold had dimensions of 10 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm and isotropic internal structures. The models were imported to the ANSYS 2022R1 software, and meshed into over 3 million unstructured tetrahedral elements. Boun- dary conditions were set with inlet flow velocities of 0.01, 0.1, and 1 mm/s, and outlet pressure of 0 Pa. Pressure, velocity, and wall shear stress were calculated as fluid flowed through the scaffolds using the Navier-Stokes equations. At the same time, permeability was determined based on Darcy' s law. The compressive strength of scaffolds with different pore sizes was evaluated by ANSYS 2022R1 Static structural analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A linear relationship was observed between the wall shear stress and fluid velocity at inlet flow rates of 0.01, 0.1 and 1 mm/s, with increasing velocity leading to higher wall shear stress. At the flow velocity of 0.1 mm/s, the initial pressures of scaffolds with pore sizes of 400, 600 and 800 μm were 0.272, 0.083 and 0.079 Pa, respectively. The fluid pressures were gradually decreased across the scaffolds. The average flow velocities were 0.093, 0.078 and 0.070 mm/s, the average wall shear stresses 2.955, 1.343 and 1.706 mPa, permeabilities values 0.54×10<sup>-8</sup> 1.80×10<sup>-8</sup> and 1.89×10<sup>-8</sup> m<sup>2</sup> in the scaffolds with pore sizes of 400, 600 and 800 μm. The scaffold surface area proportions according with optimal wall shear stress range for cell growth and osteogenic differentiation were calcula-ted, which was highest in the 600 μm scaffold (27.65%), followed by the 800 μm scaffold (17.30%) and the 400 μm scaffold (1.95%). The compressive strengths of the scaffolds were 23, 26 and 34 MPa for the 400, 600 and 800 μm pore sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The uniform stress distributions appeared in all gyroid scaffold types under compressive stress. The permeabilities of scaffolds with pore sizes of 600 and 800 μm were significantly higher than the 400 μm. The average wall shear stress in the scaffold of 600 μm was the lowest, and the scaffold surface area proportion for cell growth and osteogenic differentiation the largest, indicating that it might be the most favorable design for supporting these cellular activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":8790,"journal":{"name":"北京大学学报(医学版)","volume":"57 1","pages":"97-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"北京大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) Gyroid porous scaffolds were built with identical porosity while varying pore sizes were used by fluid mechanics finite element analysis (FEA) to simulate the in vivo microenvironment. The effects of scaffolds with different pore sizes on cell adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation were evaluated through calculating fluid velocity, wall shear stress, and permeability in the scaffolds.

Methods: Three types of gyroid porous scaffolds, with pore sizes of 400, 600 and 800 μm, were established by nTopology software. Each scaffold had dimensions of 10 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm and isotropic internal structures. The models were imported to the ANSYS 2022R1 software, and meshed into over 3 million unstructured tetrahedral elements. Boun- dary conditions were set with inlet flow velocities of 0.01, 0.1, and 1 mm/s, and outlet pressure of 0 Pa. Pressure, velocity, and wall shear stress were calculated as fluid flowed through the scaffolds using the Navier-Stokes equations. At the same time, permeability was determined based on Darcy' s law. The compressive strength of scaffolds with different pore sizes was evaluated by ANSYS 2022R1 Static structural analysis.

Results: A linear relationship was observed between the wall shear stress and fluid velocity at inlet flow rates of 0.01, 0.1 and 1 mm/s, with increasing velocity leading to higher wall shear stress. At the flow velocity of 0.1 mm/s, the initial pressures of scaffolds with pore sizes of 400, 600 and 800 μm were 0.272, 0.083 and 0.079 Pa, respectively. The fluid pressures were gradually decreased across the scaffolds. The average flow velocities were 0.093, 0.078 and 0.070 mm/s, the average wall shear stresses 2.955, 1.343 and 1.706 mPa, permeabilities values 0.54×10-8 1.80×10-8 and 1.89×10-8 m2 in the scaffolds with pore sizes of 400, 600 and 800 μm. The scaffold surface area proportions according with optimal wall shear stress range for cell growth and osteogenic differentiation were calcula-ted, which was highest in the 600 μm scaffold (27.65%), followed by the 800 μm scaffold (17.30%) and the 400 μm scaffold (1.95%). The compressive strengths of the scaffolds were 23, 26 and 34 MPa for the 400, 600 and 800 μm pore sizes.

Conclusion: The uniform stress distributions appeared in all gyroid scaffold types under compressive stress. The permeabilities of scaffolds with pore sizes of 600 and 800 μm were significantly higher than the 400 μm. The average wall shear stress in the scaffold of 600 μm was the lowest, and the scaffold surface area proportion for cell growth and osteogenic differentiation the largest, indicating that it might be the most favorable design for supporting these cellular activities.

[不同孔径生物支架细胞生长与成骨分化的水动力有限元分析]。
目的:构建具有相同孔隙率的三周期最小表面(TPMS) Gyroid多孔支架,采用流体力学有限元分析(FEA)模拟不同孔径下的体内微环境。通过计算支架内流体流速、壁剪应力和通透性,评价不同孔径支架对细胞粘附、增殖和成骨分化的影响。方法:采用nTopology软件构建孔径分别为400、600、800 μm的三种陀螺仪多孔支架。每个支架尺寸为10mm × 10mm × 10mm,内部结构各向同性。这些模型被导入ANSYS 2022R1软件,并被网格划分成300多万个非结构化四面体单元。边界条件分别为进口流速为0.01、0.1和1 mm/s,出口压力为0 Pa。使用Navier-Stokes方程计算流体流过支架时的压力、速度和壁面剪应力。同时,根据达西定律确定了磁导率。采用ANSYS 2022R1静力结构分析软件对不同孔径支架的抗压强度进行评估。结果:在进口流速为0.01、0.1和1 mm/s时,壁面剪应力与流速呈线性关系,流速越大,壁面剪应力越大。流速为0.1 mm/s时,孔径为400 μm、600 μm和800 μm的支架初始压力分别为0.272、0.083和0.079 Pa。支架内的流体压力逐渐降低。孔径为400、600和800 μm的支架平均流速分别为0.093、0.078和0.070 mm/s,平均壁面剪应力分别为2.955、1.343和1.706 mPa,渗透率分别为0.54×10-8 1.80×10-8和1.89×10-8 m2。结果表明,600 μm支架的表面积比例最高(27.65%),其次是800 μm支架(17.30%)和400 μm支架(1.95%)。孔径为400、600和800 μm的支架抗压强度分别为23、26和34 MPa。结论:在压应力作用下,各类旋转支架均呈现均匀的应力分布。孔径为600 μm和800 μm的支架的渗透率明显高于孔径为400 μm的支架。600 μm支架的平均壁剪应力最低,支架表面积对细胞生长和成骨分化的影响最大,表明该支架可能是支持这些细胞活动的最有利设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
北京大学学报(医学版)
北京大学学报(医学版) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9815
期刊介绍: Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban / Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), established in 1959, is a national academic journal sponsored by Peking University, and its former name is Journal of Beijing Medical University. The coverage of the Journal includes basic medical sciences, clinical medicine, oral medicine, surgery, public health and epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacy. Over the last few years, the Journal has published articles and reports covering major topics in the different special issues (e.g. research on disease genome, theory of drug withdrawal, mechanism and prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, stomatology, orthopaedic, public health, urology and reproductive medicine). All the topics involve latest advances in medical sciences, hot topics in specific specialties, and prevention and treatment of major diseases. The Journal has been indexed and abstracted by PubMed Central (PMC), MEDLINE/PubMed, EBSCO, Embase, Scopus, Chemical Abstracts (CA), Western Pacific Region Index Medicus (WPR), JSTChina, and almost all the Chinese sciences and technical index systems, including Chinese Science and Technology Paper Citation Database (CSTPCD), Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), China BioMedical Bibliographic Database (CBM), CMCI, Chinese Biological Abstracts, China National Academic Magazine Data-Base (CNKI), Wanfang Data (ChinaInfo), etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信