Usefulness of urinary biomarker-based risk score and multiparametric MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer detection in biopsy-naïve patients.

IF 2.3 3区医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING

Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1007/s00261-024-04727-5

Jurate Kemesiene, Carlos Nicolau, Gytis Cholstauskas, Kristina Zviniene, Mantvydas Lopeta, Simona Veneviciute, Ieva Asmenaviciute, Kamile Tamosauskaite, Ingrida Pikuniene, Mindaugas Jievaltas

{"title":"Usefulness of urinary biomarker-based risk score and multiparametric MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer detection in biopsy-naïve patients.","authors":"Jurate Kemesiene, Carlos Nicolau, Gytis Cholstauskas, Kristina Zviniene, Mantvydas Lopeta, Simona Veneviciute, Ieva Asmenaviciute, Kamile Tamosauskaite, Ingrida Pikuniene, Mindaugas Jievaltas","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04727-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), genetic urinary test (GUT), and prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator version 2.0 (PCPTRC2) for the clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) diagnostic in biopsy-naïve patients.Materials and methods: In a single center study between 2021 and 2024 participants underwent prostate mpMRI, GUT, and ultrasound (US) guided biopsy. The csPCa risk was calculated using PCPTRC2. After conducting a digital rectal examination (DRE), a GUT was performed. It incorporated the RNA levels of prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) and transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) gene and ETS-related gene (ERG) fusion genes (T: E), along with the patient's age and PSA density. The McNemar test compared detection rates between modalities.Results: 208 (mean age 62.9 years +/- 8.2) men were included prospectively. A positive GUT score was found in 67.8% and PIRADS ≥3 in 81.7% of all cases. The combination of GUT with mpMRI showed significantly higher sensitivity (99.1%) than GUT and mpMRI alone, 84.4% and 93.8%, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). Similarly, very high sensitivity (99.0%) was achieved by combining mpMRI with PCPTCR2. Nevertheless, mpMRI plus GUT combination exceeded mpMRI plus PCPTCR2 by allowing to save a higher fraction of unnecessary biopsies, 25% and 2.4%, respectively.Conclusion: GUT and mpMRI combination would allow saving a substantial fraction of unnecessary biopsies with minimal risk of missing csPCa cases.","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04727-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), genetic urinary test (GUT), and prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator version 2.0 (PCPTRC2) for the clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) diagnostic in biopsy-naïve patients.

Materials and methods: In a single center study between 2021 and 2024 participants underwent prostate mpMRI, GUT, and ultrasound (US) guided biopsy. The csPCa risk was calculated using PCPTRC2. After conducting a digital rectal examination (DRE), a GUT was performed. It incorporated the RNA levels of prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) and transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) gene and ETS-related gene (ERG) fusion genes (T: E), along with the patient's age and PSA density. The McNemar test compared detection rates between modalities.

Results: 208 (mean age 62.9 years +/- 8.2) men were included prospectively. A positive GUT score was found in 67.8% and PIRADS ≥3 in 81.7% of all cases. The combination of GUT with mpMRI showed significantly higher sensitivity (99.1%) than GUT and mpMRI alone, 84.4% and 93.8%, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). Similarly, very high sensitivity (99.0%) was achieved by combining mpMRI with PCPTCR2. Nevertheless, mpMRI plus GUT combination exceeded mpMRI plus PCPTCR2 by allowing to save a higher fraction of unnecessary biopsies, 25% and 2.4%, respectively.

Conclusion: GUT and mpMRI combination would allow saving a substantial fraction of unnecessary biopsies with minimal risk of missing csPCa cases.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

8.30%

发文量

334

期刊介绍： Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits