Laboratory and in-home evaluations of consumer- and professional-grade cockroach baits.

Johnalyn M Gordon, Angela J Sierras, Daniela V Jackson, Simona Principato, Zachary C DeVries
{"title":"Laboratory and in-home evaluations of consumer- and professional-grade cockroach baits.","authors":"Johnalyn M Gordon, Angela J Sierras, Daniela V Jackson, Simona Principato, Zachary C DeVries","doi":"10.1093/jee/toae291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>German cockroaches (Blattella germanica (L.)) are a persistent pest in affordable housing and studies indicate that residents implement control on their own to deal with cockroaches within their homes. While many do-it-yourself (DIY) control options have proven ineffective, baits are widely considered to be a viable DIY solution for residents who do not have access to professional pest control services. To evaluate their efficacy, we tested consumer-use baits (Combat gel bait, Combat bait stations, and Hot Shot liquid bait stations) in both laboratory two-choice assays and in-home assays, comparing them with professional gel baits (Vendetta Nitro, Advion Evolution, and Maxforce FC Magnum). All baits (consumer- and professional-grade) caused > 80% mortality within 14 d in laboratory assays, including against home-collected German cockroach populations. However, the in-home efficacy of consumer-grade baits in comparison to their performance in laboratory assays was inconsistent, with some baits resulting in significant declines in trap catch in 1 month (Hot Shot liquid bait stations), some taking longer (Combat gel bait), and some never showing a decline (Combat bait stations). Discrepancies between product performance in laboratory and in-home studies are concerning and suggest that laboratory assays alone might not be indicative of the potential for control, especially in the context of the more complex home environment. Failures of consumer-grade baits may require re-evaluation of current recommendations for the use of consumer-grade cockroach baits as a viable control option for residents struggling with cockroach infestations without access to professional pest management.</p>","PeriodicalId":94077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economic entomology","volume":" ","pages":"826-837"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economic entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toae291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

German cockroaches (Blattella germanica (L.)) are a persistent pest in affordable housing and studies indicate that residents implement control on their own to deal with cockroaches within their homes. While many do-it-yourself (DIY) control options have proven ineffective, baits are widely considered to be a viable DIY solution for residents who do not have access to professional pest control services. To evaluate their efficacy, we tested consumer-use baits (Combat gel bait, Combat bait stations, and Hot Shot liquid bait stations) in both laboratory two-choice assays and in-home assays, comparing them with professional gel baits (Vendetta Nitro, Advion Evolution, and Maxforce FC Magnum). All baits (consumer- and professional-grade) caused > 80% mortality within 14 d in laboratory assays, including against home-collected German cockroach populations. However, the in-home efficacy of consumer-grade baits in comparison to their performance in laboratory assays was inconsistent, with some baits resulting in significant declines in trap catch in 1 month (Hot Shot liquid bait stations), some taking longer (Combat gel bait), and some never showing a decline (Combat bait stations). Discrepancies between product performance in laboratory and in-home studies are concerning and suggest that laboratory assays alone might not be indicative of the potential for control, especially in the context of the more complex home environment. Failures of consumer-grade baits may require re-evaluation of current recommendations for the use of consumer-grade cockroach baits as a viable control option for residents struggling with cockroach infestations without access to professional pest management.

消费者级和专业级蟑螂诱饵的实验室和家庭评估。
德国蜚蠊(Blattella germanica (L.))是经济适用住房中的一种持久性害虫,研究表明,居民自行实施控制措施来处理家中的蜚蠊。虽然许多自己动手(DIY)的控制方法被证明是无效的,但对于无法获得专业虫害防治服务的居民来说,诱饵被广泛认为是一种可行的DIY解决方案。为了评估它们的功效,我们对消费者使用的诱饵(Combat gel bait, Combat bait stations, and Hot Shot liquid bait stations)进行了实验室双选择试验和家庭试验,并将它们与专业的凝胶诱饵(Vendetta Nitro, advisory Evolution和Maxforce FC Magnum)进行了比较。在实验室分析中,所有毒饵(消费级和专业级)在14天内的死亡率为80%,包括对家庭采集的德国蜚蠊种群。然而,消费者级诱饵的室内效果与其在实验室检测中的表现并不一致,一些诱饵导致陷阱捕获量在1个月内显著下降(Hot Shot液体诱饵站),一些需要更长时间(战斗凝胶诱饵站),一些从未显示下降(战斗诱饵站)。实验室和家庭研究中产品性能之间的差异令人担忧,并表明实验室分析本身可能不能表明控制的潜力,特别是在更复杂的家庭环境的背景下。消费级毒饵的失败可能需要重新评估目前的建议,即使用消费级蟑螂毒饵作为一种可行的控制选择,用于在没有专业虫害管理的情况下与蟑螂侵扰作斗争的居民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信