Understanding Compliance Rates in Suicide Research During the Post-Discharge Period.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Heather T Schatten, Gemma T Wallace, Sara K Kimble, Melanie L Bozzay
{"title":"Understanding Compliance Rates in Suicide Research During the Post-Discharge Period.","authors":"Heather T Schatten, Gemma T Wallace, Sara K Kimble, Melanie L Bozzay","doi":"10.1111/sltb.13167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The period following discharge from psychiatric hospitalization is one of particularly elevated suicide risk. It is essential to better understand risk factors for suicide during this period; however, retention and compliance in longitudinal research can be a challenge with high-risk populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined compliance rates in the six-month period following psychiatric hospital discharge among 174 adults (149 psychiatric patients and 25 healthy controls) across three data collection methods: ecological momentary assessment (EMA), weekly clinical assessment phone calls, and clinical follow-up assessments at two- and six-months post-discharge. We examined whether clinical and demographic characteristics influenced compliance rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results suggested low rates of EMA compliance, but strong rates of completion of weekly phone calls and follow-up assessments. Compared to psychiatric patients, healthy controls completed more EMA and weekly phone calls, but not follow-up assessments. Participants who met current diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode and who scored above the clinical threshold for borderline personality disorder symptoms had lower EMA compliance rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings have important implications for strategies to improve patient engagement in research during this high-risk period.</p>","PeriodicalId":39684,"journal":{"name":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","volume":"55 1","pages":"e13167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11835371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.13167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The period following discharge from psychiatric hospitalization is one of particularly elevated suicide risk. It is essential to better understand risk factors for suicide during this period; however, retention and compliance in longitudinal research can be a challenge with high-risk populations.

Methods: We examined compliance rates in the six-month period following psychiatric hospital discharge among 174 adults (149 psychiatric patients and 25 healthy controls) across three data collection methods: ecological momentary assessment (EMA), weekly clinical assessment phone calls, and clinical follow-up assessments at two- and six-months post-discharge. We examined whether clinical and demographic characteristics influenced compliance rates.

Results: Results suggested low rates of EMA compliance, but strong rates of completion of weekly phone calls and follow-up assessments. Compared to psychiatric patients, healthy controls completed more EMA and weekly phone calls, but not follow-up assessments. Participants who met current diagnostic criteria for a major depressive episode and who scored above the clinical threshold for borderline personality disorder symptoms had lower EMA compliance rates.

Conclusions: These findings have important implications for strategies to improve patient engagement in research during this high-risk period.

了解出院后自杀研究的依从率。
引言:精神病住院出院后的一段时间是自杀风险特别高的时期。必须更好地了解这一时期自杀的危险因素;然而,在纵向研究中的保留和依从性可能是高风险人群的挑战。方法:我们通过三种数据收集方法检查了174名成人(149名精神病患者和25名健康对照)在精神病医院出院后6个月内的依从率:生态瞬时评估(EMA)、每周临床评估电话和出院后2个月和6个月的临床随访评估。我们检查了临床和人口统计学特征是否影响依从率。结果:结果显示EMA依从率低,但每周电话和随访评估的完成率高。与精神病患者相比,健康对照组完成了更多的EMA和每周电话,但没有随访评估。符合当前重度抑郁发作诊断标准和边缘型人格障碍症状得分高于临床阈值的参与者,其EMA依从率较低。结论:这些发现对于在这一高危时期提高患者参与研究的策略具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: An excellent resource for researchers as well as students, Social Cognition features reports on empirical research, self-perception, self-concept, social neuroscience, person-memory integration, social schemata, the development of social cognition, and the role of affect in memory and perception. Three broad concerns define the scope of the journal: - The processes underlying the perception, memory, and judgment of social stimuli - The effects of social, cultural, and affective factors on the processing of information - The behavioral and interpersonal consequences of cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信