Cognitive Bias in Adult Zebrafish (Danio rerio): A Systematic Review.

IF 2 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Valentina Gazzano, Asahi Ogi, Francesca Cecchi, Maria Claudia Curadi, Maria Marchese, Angelo Gazzano
{"title":"Cognitive Bias in Adult Zebrafish (<i>Danio rerio</i>): A Systematic Review.","authors":"Valentina Gazzano, Asahi Ogi, Francesca Cecchi, Maria Claudia Curadi, Maria Marchese, Angelo Gazzano","doi":"10.3390/vetsci12010071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In recent years, the use of zebrafish (<i>Danio rerio</i>) as laboratory models has significantly increased. Ensuring their welfare is crucial, with the cognitive bias test emerging as a valuable tool to assess their emotional state. This systematic review examines the application of the cognitive bias test in zebrafish research.</p><p><strong>Data: </strong>The review adhered to PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Sources: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in scientific databases, including PubMed and Scopus, yielding 30 articles. Additionally, one abstract identified through bibliographic screening of selected papers was included.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Six studies were selected for analysis, and their quality was assessed using SYRCLE's risk-of-bias tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three experimental models were employed to conduct the cognitive bias test in zebrafish, focusing on the relationship between their affective state and environmental conditions, cognitive abilities, and life-history strategies but none of the studies adequately reported the techniques employed to reduce bias.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The cognitive bias test proved effective in assessing the emotional state of zebrafish; however, methodological biases may have influenced the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cognitive bias test offers valuable insights into how emotional states affect cognitive abilities, responses to environmental changes (e.g., physical enrichment), and stress responses. Further research addressing methodological limitations is necessary to validate these findings and improve data reproducibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":23694,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Sciences","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11768733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12010071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In recent years, the use of zebrafish (Danio rerio) as laboratory models has significantly increased. Ensuring their welfare is crucial, with the cognitive bias test emerging as a valuable tool to assess their emotional state. This systematic review examines the application of the cognitive bias test in zebrafish research.

Data: The review adhered to PRISMA guidelines.

Sources: A systematic search was conducted in scientific databases, including PubMed and Scopus, yielding 30 articles. Additionally, one abstract identified through bibliographic screening of selected papers was included.

Study selection: Six studies were selected for analysis, and their quality was assessed using SYRCLE's risk-of-bias tool.

Results: Three experimental models were employed to conduct the cognitive bias test in zebrafish, focusing on the relationship between their affective state and environmental conditions, cognitive abilities, and life-history strategies but none of the studies adequately reported the techniques employed to reduce bias.

Discussion: The cognitive bias test proved effective in assessing the emotional state of zebrafish; however, methodological biases may have influenced the results.

Conclusion: The cognitive bias test offers valuable insights into how emotional states affect cognitive abilities, responses to environmental changes (e.g., physical enrichment), and stress responses. Further research addressing methodological limitations is necessary to validate these findings and improve data reproducibility.

目的:近年来,使用斑马鱼(Danio rerio)作为实验室模型的情况显著增加。确保斑马鱼的福利至关重要,而认知偏差测试则成为评估斑马鱼情绪状态的重要工具。本系统综述探讨了认知偏差测试在斑马鱼研究中的应用:数据:该综述遵守了 PRISMA 准则:在科学数据库(包括 PubMed 和 Scopus)中进行了系统检索,共检索到 30 篇文章。此外,还纳入了通过对所选论文进行书目筛选而确定的一篇摘要:选择了六项研究进行分析,并使用 SYRCLE 的偏倚风险工具对其质量进行了评估:结果:采用了三种实验模型对斑马鱼进行认知偏差测试,重点研究了斑马鱼的情绪状态与环境条件、认知能力和生活史策略之间的关系,但没有一项研究充分报告了为减少偏差而采用的技术:讨论:认知偏差测试证明能有效评估斑马鱼的情绪状态,但方法上的偏差可能会影响结果:认知偏差测试为了解情绪状态如何影响认知能力、对环境变化(如物理富集)的反应以及压力反应提供了宝贵的见解。为了验证这些发现并提高数据的可重复性,有必要针对方法上的局限性开展进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Sciences
Veterinary Sciences VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
612
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Sciences is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original that are relevant to any field of veterinary sciences, including prevention, diagnosis and treatment of disease, disorder and injury in animals. This journal covers almost all topics related to animal health and veterinary medicine. Research fields of interest include but are not limited to: anaesthesiology anatomy bacteriology biochemistry cardiology dentistry dermatology embryology endocrinology epidemiology genetics histology immunology microbiology molecular biology mycology neurobiology oncology ophthalmology parasitology pathology pharmacology physiology radiology surgery theriogenology toxicology virology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信