Trauma-Induced Stress Distribution in Primary Incisors Restored With Preformed Zirconia Crowns: 3D Finite Element Analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ajay Goyal, Manjari Reshikesh, Mohammad Atif, Nitesh Tewari, Isha Duggal, Anoop Chawla, Kalpana Bansal, Morankar Rahul, Vijay Mathur, Ritu Duggal
{"title":"Trauma-Induced Stress Distribution in Primary Incisors Restored With Preformed Zirconia Crowns: 3D Finite Element Analysis.","authors":"Ajay Goyal, Manjari Reshikesh, Mohammad Atif, Nitesh Tewari, Isha Duggal, Anoop Chawla, Kalpana Bansal, Morankar Rahul, Vijay Mathur, Ritu Duggal","doi":"10.1111/edt.13040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Preformed zirconia crowns have emerged as the preferred choice for restoring damaged primary incisors. However, they differ from natural teeth in their biophysical properties and can potentially alter the overall response of crowned teeth to a traumatic load. This in silico study aimed to compare the response of three different traumatic loading conditions for the (i) natural (M1) and (ii) zirconia-restored tooth models (M2) models.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A 3D dynamic finite element (FE) analysis was performed, and minimum dynamic loads required for fracture and coronal portion disjunction of both tooth models were applied in frontal, oblique, and incisal directions. Stress concentrations, von Mises stresses, fracture patterns, and displacements were compared at different periods of the loading pulse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The computed minimum threshold loads resulting in fracture of the natural tooth model were 82 N, 166 N, and 171 N for the frontal, oblique, and incisal impacts, respectively. Fracture of the coronal portion started at 1.8 and 1.68 ms in natural tooth and zirconia-restored tooth models, respectively. Complete disjunction of coronal and radicular portions occurred earlier in the zirconia-restored tooth model (2.46 ms) than in the natural tooth model (4.5 ms) for frontal impact. The maximum von Mises stresses causing fracture ranged from 254 to 314 MPa for both models, following assigned element erosion criteria. The zirconia-restored tooth model did not experience fracture during an oblique impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The stress concentration patterns were seen to be altered in the zirconia-restored tooth model. On incisal impact, the permanent tooth germ in the natural tooth model displayed stress concentrations that were not seen in the zirconia-restored tooth model.</p>","PeriodicalId":55180,"journal":{"name":"Dental Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.13040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Preformed zirconia crowns have emerged as the preferred choice for restoring damaged primary incisors. However, they differ from natural teeth in their biophysical properties and can potentially alter the overall response of crowned teeth to a traumatic load. This in silico study aimed to compare the response of three different traumatic loading conditions for the (i) natural (M1) and (ii) zirconia-restored tooth models (M2) models.

Methodology: A 3D dynamic finite element (FE) analysis was performed, and minimum dynamic loads required for fracture and coronal portion disjunction of both tooth models were applied in frontal, oblique, and incisal directions. Stress concentrations, von Mises stresses, fracture patterns, and displacements were compared at different periods of the loading pulse.

Results: The computed minimum threshold loads resulting in fracture of the natural tooth model were 82 N, 166 N, and 171 N for the frontal, oblique, and incisal impacts, respectively. Fracture of the coronal portion started at 1.8 and 1.68 ms in natural tooth and zirconia-restored tooth models, respectively. Complete disjunction of coronal and radicular portions occurred earlier in the zirconia-restored tooth model (2.46 ms) than in the natural tooth model (4.5 ms) for frontal impact. The maximum von Mises stresses causing fracture ranged from 254 to 314 MPa for both models, following assigned element erosion criteria. The zirconia-restored tooth model did not experience fracture during an oblique impact.

Conclusion: The stress concentration patterns were seen to be altered in the zirconia-restored tooth model. On incisal impact, the permanent tooth germ in the natural tooth model displayed stress concentrations that were not seen in the zirconia-restored tooth model.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dental Traumatology
Dental Traumatology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
32.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dental Traumatology is an international journal that aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in all areas related to adult and pediatric dental traumatology. This includes the following topics: - Epidemiology, Social Aspects, Education, Diagnostics - Esthetics / Prosthetics/ Restorative - Evidence Based Traumatology & Study Design - Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery/Transplant/Implant - Pediatrics and Orthodontics - Prevention and Sports Dentistry - Endodontics and Periodontal Aspects The journal"s aim is to promote communication among clinicians, educators, researchers, and others interested in the field of dental traumatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信