Bruno Pires, Gonçalo Catarro, Sofia Soares, Joana Gonçalves, Tiago Rosado, Mário Barroso, André R T S Araujo, Eugenia Gallardo
{"title":"Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling in Toxicology.","authors":"Bruno Pires, Gonçalo Catarro, Sofia Soares, Joana Gonçalves, Tiago Rosado, Mário Barroso, André R T S Araujo, Eugenia Gallardo","doi":"10.3390/toxics13010025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) is an emerging technique in clinical and forensic toxicology. It is recognized as a promising alternative to traditional sampling methods, offering an accurate and minimally invasive means of collecting small volumes of biological samples, such as blood, urine, and saliva. Unlike conventional methods, VAMS provides advantages in terms of sample stability, storage, and transportation, as it enables samples to be collected outside laboratory environments without requiring refrigeration. This review explores several VAMS methodologies, with a particular focus on its application for the quantification of drugs and other substances in clinical and forensic toxicology. It compares VAMS to other microsampling techniques, such as dried blood spots (DBSs), highlighting VAMS's superiority in addressing issues related to sample volume consistency and environmental impact. Despite its advantages, VAMS also presents certain limitations, including higher costs and difficulties in detecting underfilled samples. Overall, VAMS stands out as a microsampling technique with the potential to enhance patient compliance and operational efficiency, positioning itself as a viable tool for toxicological analysis in both clinical and forensic contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":23195,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11768451/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13010025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) is an emerging technique in clinical and forensic toxicology. It is recognized as a promising alternative to traditional sampling methods, offering an accurate and minimally invasive means of collecting small volumes of biological samples, such as blood, urine, and saliva. Unlike conventional methods, VAMS provides advantages in terms of sample stability, storage, and transportation, as it enables samples to be collected outside laboratory environments without requiring refrigeration. This review explores several VAMS methodologies, with a particular focus on its application for the quantification of drugs and other substances in clinical and forensic toxicology. It compares VAMS to other microsampling techniques, such as dried blood spots (DBSs), highlighting VAMS's superiority in addressing issues related to sample volume consistency and environmental impact. Despite its advantages, VAMS also presents certain limitations, including higher costs and difficulties in detecting underfilled samples. Overall, VAMS stands out as a microsampling technique with the potential to enhance patient compliance and operational efficiency, positioning itself as a viable tool for toxicological analysis in both clinical and forensic contexts.
ToxicsChemical Engineering-Chemical Health and Safety
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.90%
发文量
681
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍:
Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of toxic chemicals and materials. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in detail. There is, therefore, no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, although authors should write their papers in a clear and concise way. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of calculations and experimental procedure can be deposited as supplementary material, if it is not possible to publish them along with the text.