Prostatic Artery Embolization in Elderly Comorbid Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Safety, Efficacy, and Predictive Factors of Clinical Failure.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Federico Zorzi, Giulio Rossin, Michelangelo Digregorio, Simone Lavecchia, Andrea Piasentin, Fabio Traunero, Carmelo Morreale, Michele Rizzo, Tommaso Cai, Carlo Trombetta, Alessandro Zucchi, Giovanni Liguori
{"title":"Prostatic Artery Embolization in Elderly Comorbid Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Safety, Efficacy, and Predictive Factors of Clinical Failure.","authors":"Federico Zorzi, Giulio Rossin, Michelangelo Digregorio, Simone Lavecchia, Andrea Piasentin, Fabio Traunero, Carmelo Morreale, Michele Rizzo, Tommaso Cai, Carlo Trombetta, Alessandro Zucchi, Giovanni Liguori","doi":"10.3390/jpm15010023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in elderly, multimorbid patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Additionally, it seeks to identify technical and clinical factors that predict clinical failure at the mid-term follow-up. <b>Methods</b>: We analyzed the clinical records of 175 consecutive patients who underwent PAE. Technical success was defined as achieving embolization on at least one side. Safety was assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. The pre-procedural international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) score, prostate volume (PV), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual urine (PVR) were compared with values assessed at the follow-up evaluation. Clinical failure was defined as no improvement or worsening of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) based on the IPSS at the follow-up evaluation. Univariate and multivariate regression models were applied to identify predictors of clinical failure. <b>Results</b>: 158 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 74 years (68, 79), with a median ASA score of 2 (2, 3) and a Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of 5 (4, 7). Follow-up assessments were carried out at a median of 12 months (0, 1). IPSS decreased by -5 points (-8, 0), QoL by -1 point (-1, 0), PV by -19 cc (-26, -8), PVR by -45 cc (-25 to -80), and PSA by -1.1 ng/mL (-2.5, -0.2) (<i>p</i> < 0.01); while Qmax improved by 4 mL/s (2, 6) (<i>p</i> < 0.01). A total of 44 patients (30.3%) experienced clinical failure, which was significantly correlated with unilateral embolization (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that higher CCI, elevated PVR, and the use of larger microspheres were associated with poorer clinical outcomes, with odds ratios of 2.17 (95% CI: 1.4-3.38), 1.02 (95% CI: 1.01-1.03), and 26.83 (95% CI: 4.81-149.8), respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.01). <b>Conclusions</b>: PAE is a safe and effective treatment for elderly multimorbid patients with BPH. Comprehensive pre-procedural clinical assessment, incorporating the CCI and PVR, is essential to optimize treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11767102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15010023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in elderly, multimorbid patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Additionally, it seeks to identify technical and clinical factors that predict clinical failure at the mid-term follow-up. Methods: We analyzed the clinical records of 175 consecutive patients who underwent PAE. Technical success was defined as achieving embolization on at least one side. Safety was assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. The pre-procedural international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) score, prostate volume (PV), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual urine (PVR) were compared with values assessed at the follow-up evaluation. Clinical failure was defined as no improvement or worsening of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) based on the IPSS at the follow-up evaluation. Univariate and multivariate regression models were applied to identify predictors of clinical failure. Results: 158 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 74 years (68, 79), with a median ASA score of 2 (2, 3) and a Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of 5 (4, 7). Follow-up assessments were carried out at a median of 12 months (0, 1). IPSS decreased by -5 points (-8, 0), QoL by -1 point (-1, 0), PV by -19 cc (-26, -8), PVR by -45 cc (-25 to -80), and PSA by -1.1 ng/mL (-2.5, -0.2) (p < 0.01); while Qmax improved by 4 mL/s (2, 6) (p < 0.01). A total of 44 patients (30.3%) experienced clinical failure, which was significantly correlated with unilateral embolization (p < 0.01). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that higher CCI, elevated PVR, and the use of larger microspheres were associated with poorer clinical outcomes, with odds ratios of 2.17 (95% CI: 1.4-3.38), 1.02 (95% CI: 1.01-1.03), and 26.83 (95% CI: 4.81-149.8), respectively (p < 0.01). Conclusions: PAE is a safe and effective treatment for elderly multimorbid patients with BPH. Comprehensive pre-procedural clinical assessment, incorporating the CCI and PVR, is essential to optimize treatment outcomes.

前列腺动脉栓塞治疗老年合并良性前列腺增生患者:安全性、有效性和临床失败的预测因素。
背景:本研究旨在评价前列腺动脉栓塞(PAE)治疗老年多病良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者的安全性和有效性。此外,它试图确定预测中期随访临床失败的技术和临床因素。方法:对175例连续行PAE患者的临床资料进行分析。技术上的成功被定义为至少在一侧实现栓塞。安全性评估采用Clavien-Dindo分级。将术前国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QoL)、前列腺体积(PV)、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、最大尿流率(Qmax)、空后残留尿(PVR)与随访评估值进行比较。临床失败的定义是根据IPSS随访评估,下尿路症状(LUTS)没有改善或恶化。应用单因素和多因素回归模型来确定临床失败的预测因素。结果:158例患者符合纳入标准。年龄中位数为74岁(68,79),ASA评分中位数为2 (2,3),Charlson合病指数(CCI)中位数为5(4,7)。随访时间中位数为12个月(0,1)。IPSS下降-5分(- 8,0),QoL下降-1分(- 1,0),PV下降-19 cc (-26, -8), PVR下降-45 cc(-25至-80),PSA下降-1.1 ng/mL (-2.5, -0.2) (p < 0.01);Qmax提高了4 mL/s (2,6) (p < 0.01)。临床失败44例(30.3%),与单侧栓塞有显著相关性(p < 0.01)。多因素回归分析显示,较高的CCI、较高的PVR和使用较大的微球与较差的临床结果相关,比值比分别为2.17 (95% CI: 1.4 ~ 3.38)、1.02 (95% CI: 1.01 ~ 1.03)和26.83 (95% CI: 4.81 ~ 149.8) (p < 0.01)。结论:PAE治疗老年多病性前列腺增生是一种安全有效的治疗方法。综合CCI和PVR的术前临床评估对于优化治疗效果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信