Remote-Customized Telecontrol for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: The iARPlus (Innovative Approach in Rheumatology) Initiative.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Fausto Salaffi, Sonia Farah, Eleonora Di Donato, Massimo Sonnati, Emilio Filippucci, Rossella De Angelis, Francesco Gabbrielli, Marco Di Carlo
{"title":"Remote-Customized Telecontrol for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: The iARPlus (Innovative Approach in Rheumatology) Initiative.","authors":"Fausto Salaffi, Sonia Farah, Eleonora Di Donato, Massimo Sonnati, Emilio Filippucci, Rossella De Angelis, Francesco Gabbrielli, Marco Di Carlo","doi":"10.3390/jpm15010030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>. Telecontrol approaches for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management aim to enhance patient outcomes. This pilot study assessed whether the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) approach could be used during teleconsultations to monitor RA disease activity through a web-based platform called iARPlus (Innovative Approach in Rheumatology). <b>Methods</b>. Forty RA patients participated in two in-person visits (baseline and 12 months) and seven teleconsultations over 12 months, collected via the iARPlus portal and accessible through an internet browser. Disease activity, at baseline and follow-up, was measured using the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and self-reported RAID scores throughout the study. The RAID approach, developed by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR), combines key patient-reported outcomes (PROs). <b>Results</b>. Nineteen patients (mean age: 49.3 years) were treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis), and 21 patients (mean age: 48.1 years) received adalimumab. All patients had active disease (mean CDAI 27.9 ± 4.8). Strong correlations were found between CDAI and RAID scores at baseline (ρ = 0.809, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and at follow-up (ρ = 0.789, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). JAKi-treated patients showed greater reductions in RAID scores, pain relief, and higher rates of disease remission compared to adalimumab-treated patients. <b>Conclusions</b>. RAID scores were effective in teleconsultations for assessing RA disease activity. JAKi treatment resulted in better pain control and disease activity improvement compared to adalimumab. Further studies are needed to confirm the clinical and economic benefits of telecontrol for RA management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15010030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. Telecontrol approaches for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management aim to enhance patient outcomes. This pilot study assessed whether the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) approach could be used during teleconsultations to monitor RA disease activity through a web-based platform called iARPlus (Innovative Approach in Rheumatology). Methods. Forty RA patients participated in two in-person visits (baseline and 12 months) and seven teleconsultations over 12 months, collected via the iARPlus portal and accessible through an internet browser. Disease activity, at baseline and follow-up, was measured using the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and self-reported RAID scores throughout the study. The RAID approach, developed by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR), combines key patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Results. Nineteen patients (mean age: 49.3 years) were treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis), and 21 patients (mean age: 48.1 years) received adalimumab. All patients had active disease (mean CDAI 27.9 ± 4.8). Strong correlations were found between CDAI and RAID scores at baseline (ρ = 0.809, p < 0.0001) and at follow-up (ρ = 0.789, p < 0.0001). JAKi-treated patients showed greater reductions in RAID scores, pain relief, and higher rates of disease remission compared to adalimumab-treated patients. Conclusions. RAID scores were effective in teleconsultations for assessing RA disease activity. JAKi treatment resulted in better pain control and disease activity improvement compared to adalimumab. Further studies are needed to confirm the clinical and economic benefits of telecontrol for RA management.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信