Effects of epidural dexmedetomidine on patient-controlled epidural analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Seong Min Han, So Young Kwon, Jaesuk Kim, Jae Hyuk Kang, Jin Deok Joo
{"title":"Effects of epidural dexmedetomidine on patient-controlled epidural analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study.","authors":"Seong Min Han, So Young Kwon, Jaesuk Kim, Jae Hyuk Kang, Jin Deok Joo","doi":"10.1177/03000605241311169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of adding epidural dexmedetomidine to low-concentration patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) on pain control and side effects in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this double-blind study, American Society of Anesthesiologists I to II patients undergoing TKA were assigned to receive 0.125% bupivacaine + fentanyl 4 µg/mL (group R) or 0.1% bupivacaine + fentanyl 2 µg/mL with an epidural injection of dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg (group D). The primary outcomes were the effectiveness of postoperative pain control as assessed by the numeric pain rating scale (NRS) and the incidence of side effects. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate), motor block assessment, sensory block duration, analgesia duration, and the need for additional analgesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups achieved similar pain control as indicated by NRS scores. However, group D experienced lower rates of urinary retention and pruritus, whereas sedation in the recovery room was greater in group D. Group R had significantly higher systolic pressure in the recovery room. group D exhibited significantly lower heart rates at 5 and 10 minutes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-concentration PCEA with epidural dexmedetomidine provides similar analgesia after TKA as high-concentration PCEA with fewer side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"53 1","pages":"3000605241311169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605241311169","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of adding epidural dexmedetomidine to low-concentration patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) on pain control and side effects in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods: In this double-blind study, American Society of Anesthesiologists I to II patients undergoing TKA were assigned to receive 0.125% bupivacaine + fentanyl 4 µg/mL (group R) or 0.1% bupivacaine + fentanyl 2 µg/mL with an epidural injection of dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg (group D). The primary outcomes were the effectiveness of postoperative pain control as assessed by the numeric pain rating scale (NRS) and the incidence of side effects. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate), motor block assessment, sensory block duration, analgesia duration, and the need for additional analgesia.

Results: Both groups achieved similar pain control as indicated by NRS scores. However, group D experienced lower rates of urinary retention and pruritus, whereas sedation in the recovery room was greater in group D. Group R had significantly higher systolic pressure in the recovery room. group D exhibited significantly lower heart rates at 5 and 10 minutes.

Conclusions: Low-concentration PCEA with epidural dexmedetomidine provides similar analgesia after TKA as high-concentration PCEA with fewer side effects.

硬膜外右美托咪定对全膝关节置换术后患者自控硬膜外镇痛的影响:一项单中心、前瞻性、双盲、随机对照研究。
目的:评价在低浓度患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)中加入右美托咪定对全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者疼痛控制及不良反应的影响。方法:在这项双盲研究中,美国麻醉师学会I至II期TKA患者被分配到接受0.125%布比卡因+芬太尼4µg/mL (R组)或0.1%布比卡因+芬太尼2µg/mL并硬膜外注射右美托咪定1µg/kg (D组)。主要结果是通过数字疼痛评定量表(NRS)评估术后疼痛控制的有效性和副作用的发生率。次要结局包括血流动力学参数(收缩压和舒张压、心率)、运动阻滞评估、感觉阻滞持续时间、镇痛持续时间以及是否需要额外的镇痛。结果:根据NRS评分,两组均获得相似的疼痛控制。然而,D组尿潴留和瘙痒的发生率较低,而D组在恢复室镇静作用更大。R组在恢复室收缩压明显较高。D组在5分钟和10分钟时心率明显降低。结论:低浓度PCEA硬膜外联合右美托咪定对TKA术后的镇痛效果与高浓度PCEA相似,且副作用更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信