Dissatisfaction after implantation of extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Joukje C Wanten, Noël J C Bauer, Tos T J M Berendschot, Frank J H M van den Biggelaar, Rudy M M A Nuijts
{"title":"Dissatisfaction after implantation of extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses.","authors":"Joukje C Wanten, Noël J C Bauer, Tos T J M Berendschot, Frank J H M van den Biggelaar, Rudy M M A Nuijts","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the symptoms, etiology and treatment of patient dissatisfaction after extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University Eye Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this study, all medical records of patients who received an EDOF IOL from July 2020 to July 2022 were reviewed. Patients were included if they had reported any dissatisfaction after surgery. The main outcome parameters were reasons for dissatisfaction (subjective complaints) and the presumed etiology of the complaints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 202 patients (354 eyes) who underwent EDOF IOL implantation, 83 eyes (22.8%) of 52 dissatisfied patients were included. Blurred vision was the predominant complaint, reported in 78 eyes (94%). Photic phenomena were reported in 21 eyes (25.3%), with 16 eyes (76.2%) experiencing coexisting blurred vision. The major etiologies for dissatisfaction in this cohort were residual ametropia (51.8%), dry eye disease (26.5%), and posterior capsular opacification (12.0%). Treatments were administered to 85.5% of the eyes, including interventions such as artificial tears, spectacles, or refractive surgery enhancement. A small number of patients (n=12; 5.9%) remained dissatisfied despite intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on this real-world data study, dissatisfaction following EDOF IOL implantation can be effectively identified and treated in most cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001615","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the symptoms, etiology and treatment of patient dissatisfaction after extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

Setting: University Eye Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands.

Design: Retrospective case series.

Methods: For this study, all medical records of patients who received an EDOF IOL from July 2020 to July 2022 were reviewed. Patients were included if they had reported any dissatisfaction after surgery. The main outcome parameters were reasons for dissatisfaction (subjective complaints) and the presumed etiology of the complaints.

Results: Out of 202 patients (354 eyes) who underwent EDOF IOL implantation, 83 eyes (22.8%) of 52 dissatisfied patients were included. Blurred vision was the predominant complaint, reported in 78 eyes (94%). Photic phenomena were reported in 21 eyes (25.3%), with 16 eyes (76.2%) experiencing coexisting blurred vision. The major etiologies for dissatisfaction in this cohort were residual ametropia (51.8%), dry eye disease (26.5%), and posterior capsular opacification (12.0%). Treatments were administered to 85.5% of the eyes, including interventions such as artificial tears, spectacles, or refractive surgery enhancement. A small number of patients (n=12; 5.9%) remained dissatisfied despite intervention.

Conclusion: Based on this real-world data study, dissatisfaction following EDOF IOL implantation can be effectively identified and treated in most cases.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信