The prevalence and immune response to coinfection by avian haemosporidians in wild Eurasian blackbirds Turdus merula.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PARASITOLOGY
Ellie Lebeau, Jenny C Dunn
{"title":"The prevalence and immune response to coinfection by avian haemosporidians in wild Eurasian blackbirds <i>Turdus merula</i>.","authors":"Ellie Lebeau, Jenny C Dunn","doi":"10.1017/S0031182024000829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coinfection of a host by more than 1 parasite is more common than single infection in wild environments and can have differing impacts, although coinfections have relatively rarely been quantified. Host immune responses to coinfection can contribute to infection costs but are often harder to predict than those associated with single infection, due to the influence of within-host parasite–parasite interactions on infection virulence. To first quantify coinfection in a common bird species, and then to test for immune-related impacts of coinfection, we investigated the prevalence and immune response to avian haemosporidian (genera: <i>Plasmodium</i>, <i>Haemoproteus</i> and <i>Leucocytozoon</i>) coinfection in wild blackbirds. Coinfection status was diagnosed using a 1-step multiplex polymerase chain reaction, immune response was quantified through white blood cell counts and heterophil: lymphocyte ratios, and parasitaemia was quantified for each infected sample. We detected high rates of haemosporidian infection and coinfection, although neither impacted immune activity, despite a significantly higher parasitaemia in individuals experiencing double <i>vs</i> single infection. This suggests that immune-related costs of haemosporidian single and coinfection are low in this system. This could be due to long-term host–parasite coevolution, which has decreased infection virulence, or a consequence of reduced costs associated with chronic infections compared to acute infections. Alternatively, our results may obscure immune-related costs associated with specific combinations of coinfecting haemosporidian genera, species or lineages. Future research should investigate interactions that occur between haemosporidian parasites within hosts, as well as the ways in which these interactions and resulting impacts may vary depending on parasite identity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19967,"journal":{"name":"Parasitology","volume":" ","pages":"1406-1415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12052428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182024000829","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coinfection of a host by more than 1 parasite is more common than single infection in wild environments and can have differing impacts, although coinfections have relatively rarely been quantified. Host immune responses to coinfection can contribute to infection costs but are often harder to predict than those associated with single infection, due to the influence of within-host parasite–parasite interactions on infection virulence. To first quantify coinfection in a common bird species, and then to test for immune-related impacts of coinfection, we investigated the prevalence and immune response to avian haemosporidian (genera: Plasmodium, Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon) coinfection in wild blackbirds. Coinfection status was diagnosed using a 1-step multiplex polymerase chain reaction, immune response was quantified through white blood cell counts and heterophil: lymphocyte ratios, and parasitaemia was quantified for each infected sample. We detected high rates of haemosporidian infection and coinfection, although neither impacted immune activity, despite a significantly higher parasitaemia in individuals experiencing double vs single infection. This suggests that immune-related costs of haemosporidian single and coinfection are low in this system. This could be due to long-term host–parasite coevolution, which has decreased infection virulence, or a consequence of reduced costs associated with chronic infections compared to acute infections. Alternatively, our results may obscure immune-related costs associated with specific combinations of coinfecting haemosporidian genera, species or lineages. Future research should investigate interactions that occur between haemosporidian parasites within hosts, as well as the ways in which these interactions and resulting impacts may vary depending on parasite identity.

野生欧亚黑鹂血孢子虫共感染的流行及免疫反应。
在野生环境中,一个宿主同时感染1种以上的寄生虫比单一感染更为常见,并且可能产生不同的影响,尽管对同时感染的量化相对较少。由于宿主内寄生虫-寄生虫相互作用对感染毒力的影响,宿主对合并感染的免疫反应可能会增加感染成本,但往往比与单一感染相关的免疫反应更难预测。为了量化鸟类的共感染情况,并检验共感染对免疫系统的影响,本研究调查了野生黑鹂对禽类血孢子虫(属:疟原虫、嗜血杆菌和白细胞虫)共感染的流行情况和免疫反应。采用1步多重聚合酶链反应诊断共感染状态,通过白细胞计数和嗜白细胞:淋巴细胞比率定量免疫反应,并定量每个感染样本的寄生虫血症。我们检测到血孢子虫感染和合并感染的高发率,尽管两者都不影响免疫活性,尽管在经历双重感染和单一感染的个体中寄生虫血症明显更高。这表明在该系统中,单一和合并感染的血孢子虫免疫相关费用较低。这可能是由于长期的宿主-寄生虫共同进化,这降低了感染的毒性,或者与急性感染相比,慢性感染的相关费用降低了。或者,我们的结果可能模糊了与合并感染血孢子虫属、种或谱系的特定组合相关的免疫相关成本。未来的研究应该调查宿主内血孢子虫寄生虫之间发生的相互作用,以及这些相互作用和由此产生的影响可能因寄生虫身份而异的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parasitology
Parasitology 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Parasitology is an important specialist journal covering the latest advances in the subject. It publishes original research and review papers on all aspects of parasitology and host-parasite relationships, including the latest discoveries in parasite biochemistry, molecular biology and genetics, ecology and epidemiology in the context of the biological, medical and veterinary sciences. Included in the subscription price are two special issues which contain reviews of current hot topics, one of which is the proceedings of the annual Symposia of the British Society for Parasitology, while the second, covering areas of significant topical interest, is commissioned by the editors and the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信