Comparison of Hepatic Function and Chemotherapy-Induced Side Effects Between Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD), Topotecan (TOPO), and Gemcitabine in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer (PROC).

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Radu-Dumitru Dragomir, Marina Adriana Mercioni, Șerban Negru, Dorel Popovici, Sorin Săftescu, Andiana Roxana Blidari, Ioan Sas
{"title":"Comparison of Hepatic Function and Chemotherapy-Induced Side Effects Between Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD), Topotecan (TOPO), and Gemcitabine in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer (PROC).","authors":"Radu-Dumitru Dragomir, Marina Adriana Mercioni, Șerban Negru, Dorel Popovici, Sorin Săftescu, Andiana Roxana Blidari, Ioan Sas","doi":"10.3390/jpm15010039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) is a major therapeutic challenge, as it responds poorly to standard platinum-based treatment, has limited treatment options, and offers a generally unfavorable prognosis. Chemotherapeutic agents like pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), topotecan (TOPO), and gemcitabine (GEM) are used for this setting, but with varying efficacy and toxicity profiles, leading to an increasing need to understand the optimal balance between treatment effectiveness and tolerability for improving patient outcomes. This study evaluates the efficacy and side effects of PLD, TOPO, and GEM, focusing on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a retrospective observational study that included 856 PROC patients treated with PLD (<i>n</i> = 383), TOPO (<i>n</i> = 352), or GEM (<i>n</i> = 121) at the OncoHelp Oncology Center from January 2018 to December 2023. Inclusion criteria encompass diagnosis, prior platinum therapy, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status (0-2). Treatment protocols followed standard dosing, with adjustments for toxicity. Primary endpoints included PFS and OS, with safety assessed by incidence of grade 3 and 4 toxicities per CTCAE v5.0. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to compare survival, and statistical significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results</b>: TOPO showed higher toxicity than PLD and GEM, including liver damage, hematological and non-hematological side effects, while PLD induced more skin toxicity. In terms of survival, minor differences were seen between the three chemotherapeutic agents, with a slight advantage for PLD for better disease control. <b>Conclusions</b>: Given the comparable results in OS across the regimens, treatment decisions should be based on other factors such as patient tolerance and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15010039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) is a major therapeutic challenge, as it responds poorly to standard platinum-based treatment, has limited treatment options, and offers a generally unfavorable prognosis. Chemotherapeutic agents like pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), topotecan (TOPO), and gemcitabine (GEM) are used for this setting, but with varying efficacy and toxicity profiles, leading to an increasing need to understand the optimal balance between treatment effectiveness and tolerability for improving patient outcomes. This study evaluates the efficacy and side effects of PLD, TOPO, and GEM, focusing on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study that included 856 PROC patients treated with PLD (n = 383), TOPO (n = 352), or GEM (n = 121) at the OncoHelp Oncology Center from January 2018 to December 2023. Inclusion criteria encompass diagnosis, prior platinum therapy, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status (0-2). Treatment protocols followed standard dosing, with adjustments for toxicity. Primary endpoints included PFS and OS, with safety assessed by incidence of grade 3 and 4 toxicities per CTCAE v5.0. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to compare survival, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: TOPO showed higher toxicity than PLD and GEM, including liver damage, hematological and non-hematological side effects, while PLD induced more skin toxicity. In terms of survival, minor differences were seen between the three chemotherapeutic agents, with a slight advantage for PLD for better disease control. Conclusions: Given the comparable results in OS across the regimens, treatment decisions should be based on other factors such as patient tolerance and quality of life.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信