Perioperative Supportive Care Interventions to Enhance Surgical Outcomes for Older Adults With Cancer: A Systematic Review.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1200/OP-24-00762
Anh B Lam, Luke Sorensen, Vanessa A Moore, Max J Bouvette, Adolfo Diaz Barba, Shari Clifton, Andrea Wismann, Katie Keyser, Myrick C Shinall, Ryan David Nipp
{"title":"Perioperative Supportive Care Interventions to Enhance Surgical Outcomes for Older Adults With Cancer: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Anh B Lam, Luke Sorensen, Vanessa A Moore, Max J Bouvette, Adolfo Diaz Barba, Shari Clifton, Andrea Wismann, Katie Keyser, Myrick C Shinall, Ryan David Nipp","doi":"10.1200/OP-24-00762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Older adults with cancer have unique needs, which likely influence surgical outcomes in the geriatric oncology population. We conducted a systematic review to describe the literature focused on perioperative supportive care interventions for older adults with cancer undergoing surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we performed a comprehensive search using the Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase databases for literature published from January 2010 to October 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on supportive care interventions that enrolled adults older than 60 years with cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 11 RCTs with 2,177 patients in this review. Patients' age ranged from 60 to 95, and the median number of patients per study was 147 (range, 44-690). Most studies included patients with colorectal cancer (81.8%). Half of the studies (54.5%) evaluated exercise interventions, and the remaining assessed geriatric assessment-guided interventions (27.2%), nutrition optimization (9.1%), and patient empowerment (9.1%). Primary outcomes included postoperative complications, quality of life, feasibility of exercise programs, inspiratory muscle endurance, and hospital length of stay, among others. All studies had postoperative complications as a primary or secondary outcome. We found implementation challenges that influenced several studies, including high dropout rates and intervention fidelity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found 11 studies focused on perioperative supportive care interventions in older adults with cancer undergoing surgery. Notably, interventions involved exercise, geriatric assessment-guided care, nutrition optimization, and patient empowerment. We also found heterogeneity in intervention modality and outcome assessment, thus demonstrating a need for ongoing work to address the unique needs of the geriatric oncology population.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"1106-1117"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-24-00762","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Older adults with cancer have unique needs, which likely influence surgical outcomes in the geriatric oncology population. We conducted a systematic review to describe the literature focused on perioperative supportive care interventions for older adults with cancer undergoing surgery.

Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we performed a comprehensive search using the Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase databases for literature published from January 2010 to October 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on supportive care interventions that enrolled adults older than 60 years with cancer.

Results: We included 11 RCTs with 2,177 patients in this review. Patients' age ranged from 60 to 95, and the median number of patients per study was 147 (range, 44-690). Most studies included patients with colorectal cancer (81.8%). Half of the studies (54.5%) evaluated exercise interventions, and the remaining assessed geriatric assessment-guided interventions (27.2%), nutrition optimization (9.1%), and patient empowerment (9.1%). Primary outcomes included postoperative complications, quality of life, feasibility of exercise programs, inspiratory muscle endurance, and hospital length of stay, among others. All studies had postoperative complications as a primary or secondary outcome. We found implementation challenges that influenced several studies, including high dropout rates and intervention fidelity.

Conclusion: We found 11 studies focused on perioperative supportive care interventions in older adults with cancer undergoing surgery. Notably, interventions involved exercise, geriatric assessment-guided care, nutrition optimization, and patient empowerment. We also found heterogeneity in intervention modality and outcome assessment, thus demonstrating a need for ongoing work to address the unique needs of the geriatric oncology population.

围手术期支持性护理干预提高老年癌症患者手术效果:系统综述。
目的:老年癌症患者有独特的需求,这可能会影响老年肿瘤患者的手术结果。我们进行了一项系统综述,描述了有关高龄癌症手术患者围手术期支持性护理干预的文献。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,我们使用Ovid MEDLINE、CINAHL和Embase数据库对2010年1月至2023年10月发表的文献进行了全面检索。我们纳入了关注支持性护理干预的随机对照试验(rct),纳入了60岁以上的癌症患者。结果:我们纳入了11项随机对照试验,共2177例患者。患者年龄从60岁到95岁不等,每项研究的中位患者数为147例(范围44-690)。大多数研究包括结直肠癌患者(81.8%)。一半的研究(54.5%)评估了运动干预,其余的评估了老年评估指导的干预(27.2%)、营养优化(9.1%)和患者赋权(9.1%)。主要结局包括术后并发症、生活质量、运动方案的可行性、吸气肌耐力和住院时间等。所有的研究都将术后并发症作为主要或次要结局。我们发现实施方面的挑战影响了几项研究,包括高辍学率和干预保真度。结论:我们发现了11项研究,重点关注老年癌症手术患者围手术期支持性护理干预。值得注意的是,干预措施包括锻炼、老年评估指导的护理、营养优化和患者赋权。我们还发现干预方式和结果评估存在异质性,因此需要继续开展工作来解决老年肿瘤人群的独特需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信