Detectability of Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH PET for Nodal Metastases in Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

IF 9.6 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Xiaoyi Guo, Jiayue Liu, Shiyu Lin, Xinyu Gui, Jin Ding, Teli Liu, Nina Zhou, Suping Li, Hua Zhu, Zhi Yang
{"title":"Detectability of Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH PET for Nodal Metastases in Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.","authors":"Xiaoyi Guo, Jiayue Liu, Shiyu Lin, Xinyu Gui, Jin Ding, Teli Liu, Nina Zhou, Suping Li, Hua Zhu, Zhi Yang","doi":"10.1097/RLU.0000000000005686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH and 18F-FDG for detecting nodal metastases in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer on PET/CT.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 62 participants with HER2-positive breast cancer underwent both Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Participants were pathologically confirmed as HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+ with gene amplification on FISH). Three independent readers visually assessed uptake of tracers on imaging. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy of nodal metastases was assessed using c-statistics. The lesion uptakes were quantified by SUVmax and target-to-background ratio (TBR) and compared using the general linear mixed model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings showed nodal metastases in 33 (53%) participants, including 45% only with regional nodal metastasis and 55% with nonregional nodal metastasis. On per-patient level, the sensitivity and specificity of Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH and 18F-FDG based on the majority reads were 0.97, 0.97, and 0.85, 0.77, respectively. Five participants were visualized only on Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH. Seven participants with high uptake only on 18F-FDG PET/CT were confirmed to be inflammatory uptake by pathological results and later imaging follow-up. On per-lesion level, Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH PET/CT detected more axillary (98.8% vs 70.2%), extra-axillary (100% vs 61.7%), and nonregional (99.1% vs 67.0%) lymph nodal metastases than 18F-FDG PET/CT. Additionally, Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH PET/CT detected more nodal metastases small than 10 mm than 18F-FDG PET/CT (198 vs 125, 99.5% vs 62.8%). The median SUVmax and TBR of regional or nonregional nodal metastases at Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH were all higher than those on 18F-FDG (range of median SUVmax, 8.0-11.4 vs 2.3-5.6; P range, <0.001-0.007; range of median TBR, 7.3-16.3 vs 2.9-5.3; P range, <0.001). No adverse reactions related to imaging agents were observed in all participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH PET/CT detected more regional and nonregional lymph nodal metastases in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer than on 18F-FDG PET/CT, especially for lesions small than 10 mm.</p>","PeriodicalId":10692,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000005686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH and 18F-FDG for detecting nodal metastases in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer on PET/CT.

Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, 62 participants with HER2-positive breast cancer underwent both Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH and 18F-FDG PET/CT. Participants were pathologically confirmed as HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or IHC 2+ with gene amplification on FISH). Three independent readers visually assessed uptake of tracers on imaging. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy of nodal metastases was assessed using c-statistics. The lesion uptakes were quantified by SUVmax and target-to-background ratio (TBR) and compared using the general linear mixed model.

Results: The findings showed nodal metastases in 33 (53%) participants, including 45% only with regional nodal metastasis and 55% with nonregional nodal metastasis. On per-patient level, the sensitivity and specificity of Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH and 18F-FDG based on the majority reads were 0.97, 0.97, and 0.85, 0.77, respectively. Five participants were visualized only on Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH. Seven participants with high uptake only on 18F-FDG PET/CT were confirmed to be inflammatory uptake by pathological results and later imaging follow-up. On per-lesion level, Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH PET/CT detected more axillary (98.8% vs 70.2%), extra-axillary (100% vs 61.7%), and nonregional (99.1% vs 67.0%) lymph nodal metastases than 18F-FDG PET/CT. Additionally, Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH PET/CT detected more nodal metastases small than 10 mm than 18F-FDG PET/CT (198 vs 125, 99.5% vs 62.8%). The median SUVmax and TBR of regional or nonregional nodal metastases at Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH were all higher than those on 18F-FDG (range of median SUVmax, 8.0-11.4 vs 2.3-5.6; P range, <0.001-0.007; range of median TBR, 7.3-16.3 vs 2.9-5.3; P range, <0.001). No adverse reactions related to imaging agents were observed in all participants.

Conclusions: Al18F-NOTA-HER2-BCH PET/CT detected more regional and nonregional lymph nodal metastases in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer than on 18F-FDG PET/CT, especially for lesions small than 10 mm.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Nuclear Medicine
Clinical Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
31.10%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Nuclear Medicine is a comprehensive and current resource for professionals in the field of nuclear medicine. It caters to both generalists and specialists, offering valuable insights on how to effectively apply nuclear medicine techniques in various clinical scenarios. With a focus on timely dissemination of information, this journal covers the latest developments that impact all aspects of the specialty. Geared towards practitioners, Clinical Nuclear Medicine is the ultimate practice-oriented publication in the field of nuclear imaging. Its informative articles are complemented by numerous illustrations that demonstrate how physicians can seamlessly integrate the knowledge gained into their everyday practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信