Communicating scientific evidence: drugs for Alzheimer's disease as a case study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Current Medical Research and Opinion Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1080/03007995.2025.2458530
Kasper P Kepp, Poul F Høilund-Carlsen, Ioana A Cristea, Robert G Cumming, Timothy Daly, Louise Emilsson, Maria E Flacco, Lars G Hemkens, Perrine Janiaud, Kasper B Johnsen, Tea Lallukka, Taulant Muka, Florian Naudet, Mona-Elisabeth R Revheim, Rosanna Squitti, Madhav Thambisetty
{"title":"Communicating scientific evidence: drugs for Alzheimer's disease as a case study.","authors":"Kasper P Kepp, Poul F Høilund-Carlsen, Ioana A Cristea, Robert G Cumming, Timothy Daly, Louise Emilsson, Maria E Flacco, Lars G Hemkens, Perrine Janiaud, Kasper B Johnsen, Tea Lallukka, Taulant Muka, Florian Naudet, Mona-Elisabeth R Revheim, Rosanna Squitti, Madhav Thambisetty","doi":"10.1080/03007995.2025.2458530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper reviews the scientific evidence on new anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies for treating Alzheimer's disease as a case study for improving scientific evidence communication. We introduce five guidelines condensed from the biomedical evidence literature but adapted to the short format of science communication in e.g. journal opinion pieces and newspaper articles. Given the major importance and recent confusion regarding the discussed drugs, with certain disagreements seen e.g. between FDA and EMA, the suggested guidelines may be useful to clinicians discussing with their patients and to scientists communicating the evidence in balance. More generally, we hope that the guidelines may help us to improve communication of scientific evidence on complex topics in opinion pieces in the scientific literature, in advocacy, and in media appearances.</p>","PeriodicalId":10814,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","volume":" ","pages":"347-354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2025.2458530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reviews the scientific evidence on new anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies for treating Alzheimer's disease as a case study for improving scientific evidence communication. We introduce five guidelines condensed from the biomedical evidence literature but adapted to the short format of science communication in e.g. journal opinion pieces and newspaper articles. Given the major importance and recent confusion regarding the discussed drugs, with certain disagreements seen e.g. between FDA and EMA, the suggested guidelines may be useful to clinicians discussing with their patients and to scientists communicating the evidence in balance. More generally, we hope that the guidelines may help us to improve communication of scientific evidence on complex topics in opinion pieces in the scientific literature, in advocacy, and in media appearances.

传达科学证据:以阿尔茨海默病药物为例研究。
本文对新型抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体治疗阿尔茨海默病的科学证据进行了综述,以促进科学证据的交流。我们介绍了从生物医学证据文献中提炼出来的五条指导原则,这些指导原则适用于科学传播的简短格式,例如期刊评论文章和报纸文章。考虑到所讨论药物的重要性和最近的混乱,以及FDA和EMA之间的某些分歧,建议的指南可能对临床医生与患者讨论和科学家平衡地交流证据有用。更一般地说,我们希望该指南可以帮助我们在科学文献的评论文章、倡导和媒体露面中改善有关复杂主题的科学证据的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Current Medical Research and Opinion 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Medical Research and Opinion is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal for the rapid publication of original research on new and existing drugs and therapies, Phase II-IV studies, and post-marketing investigations. Equivalence, safety and efficacy/effectiveness studies are especially encouraged. Preclinical, Phase I, pharmacoeconomic, outcomes and quality of life studies may also be considered if there is clear clinical relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信