Direct Axillary Artery Cannulation as Standard Perfusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Christian Sellin, Ahmed Belmenai, Volodymyr Demianenko, Marius Grossmann, Hilmar Dörge
{"title":"Direct Axillary Artery Cannulation as Standard Perfusion Strategy in Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.","authors":"Christian Sellin, Ahmed Belmenai, Volodymyr Demianenko, Marius Grossmann, Hilmar Dörge","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12010031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) via the right axillary artery (RAA) has become an alternative perfusion strategy, especially in complex aortic procedures. This study delineates our technique and outcome with direct axillary cannulation utilizing the Seldinger technique, which we adopted as the standard perfusion strategy in the sternum-sparing minimally invasive total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy (TCRAT) using CPB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From November 2019 to December 2023, a total of 413 consecutive patients underwent nonemergent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) via left anterior minithoracotomy on CPB with peripheral cannulation via the RAA and cardioplegic cardiac arrest, using this technique as a default strategy in the daily routine. All patients had multivessel coronary artery disease. The primary outcome was intraoperative cannulation-related complications (bleeding, revision, ischemia, wound healing complications). The secondary outcome was cannulation-related events during follow-up (blood pressure differences, incidence of brachial plexus injury, clinical signs of circulatory problems of arm and hand, re-interventions). Mean midterm follow-up was 18.7 ± 12.3 [1.1-51.2] months. During follow-up, 16 patients died. Overall, a total of 397 patients (344 male; 67.6 ± 9.7 [32-88]) were included for follow-up (100%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RAA was successfully cannulated in 100% of patients. A cannula size of 16 Fr was used in 34.6%, 18 Fr in 63.9% and 20 Fr in 1.5% of all patients. There was no intraoperative bleeding complication. In two patients, intraoperative revision of the RAA was required, necessitating a venous patch repair. At follow-up, there were no differences between the systolic and diastolic blood pressure or the pressure gradients between the right and left arm. Transient numbness of the right hand was observed in two patients. Permanent numbness was not observed. No patient needed further intervention or surgical revision of the RAA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The right axillary cannulation is feasible and safe in terms of vascular injury and brachial plexus injury with excellent in-hospital and follow-up outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11766195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12010031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) via the right axillary artery (RAA) has become an alternative perfusion strategy, especially in complex aortic procedures. This study delineates our technique and outcome with direct axillary cannulation utilizing the Seldinger technique, which we adopted as the standard perfusion strategy in the sternum-sparing minimally invasive total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy (TCRAT) using CPB.

Methods: From November 2019 to December 2023, a total of 413 consecutive patients underwent nonemergent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) via left anterior minithoracotomy on CPB with peripheral cannulation via the RAA and cardioplegic cardiac arrest, using this technique as a default strategy in the daily routine. All patients had multivessel coronary artery disease. The primary outcome was intraoperative cannulation-related complications (bleeding, revision, ischemia, wound healing complications). The secondary outcome was cannulation-related events during follow-up (blood pressure differences, incidence of brachial plexus injury, clinical signs of circulatory problems of arm and hand, re-interventions). Mean midterm follow-up was 18.7 ± 12.3 [1.1-51.2] months. During follow-up, 16 patients died. Overall, a total of 397 patients (344 male; 67.6 ± 9.7 [32-88]) were included for follow-up (100%).

Results: The RAA was successfully cannulated in 100% of patients. A cannula size of 16 Fr was used in 34.6%, 18 Fr in 63.9% and 20 Fr in 1.5% of all patients. There was no intraoperative bleeding complication. In two patients, intraoperative revision of the RAA was required, necessitating a venous patch repair. At follow-up, there were no differences between the systolic and diastolic blood pressure or the pressure gradients between the right and left arm. Transient numbness of the right hand was observed in two patients. Permanent numbness was not observed. No patient needed further intervention or surgical revision of the RAA.

Conclusions: The right axillary cannulation is feasible and safe in terms of vascular injury and brachial plexus injury with excellent in-hospital and follow-up outcome.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信