Risk factors for Staphylococcus aureus colonization in a general emergency department patient cohort - results of an observational cohort study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Dorothee Riedlinger, Fabian Holert, Petra Gastmeier, Axel Kola, Anna Slagman, Vmd, Martin Möckel
{"title":"Risk factors for Staphylococcus aureus colonization in a general emergency department patient cohort - results of an observational cohort study.","authors":"Dorothee Riedlinger, Fabian Holert, Petra Gastmeier, Axel Kola, Anna Slagman, Vmd, Martin Möckel","doi":"10.1080/1354750X.2025.2451950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Testing for <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (SA) colonization in emergency department (ED) patients may guide prevention strategies against hospital acquired infections (HAI). This study determined the prevalence of SA carriers in a general ED population, characterized the population, and identified predictors for SA colonization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective monocentric observational cohort study in a tertiary care hospital collected nasopharyngeal swabs in 1,000 adult patients. PCR testing for methicillin resistant and methicillin sensitive SA (MRSA/MSSA) was performed. Risk factor questionnaires and routine data from the clinical information system were captured. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression models were applied to report prevalence and outcomes and to identify predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence for SA was 33.7% (n = 328; 95%-CI: 30.7-36.8): MSSA 30.9% (n = 301; 95%-CI: 28.0-34.0) and MRSA 2.8% (n = 27; 95%-CI: 1.8-4.0). POC PCR testing in the ED was feasible. Key predictors of SA colonization included having a catheter (OR 2.0, 95%-CI 1.0-4.0, p = 0.044) and requiring nursing care (OR 1.9, 95%-CI: 1.2-2.9, p = 0.007), even after adjusting for age and sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Testing strategies for SA detection in ED need to focus on vulnerable populations with an elevated risk for HAIs and associated adverse outcomes. Individuals requiring nursing care could be a key target population for screening efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":8921,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1354750X.2025.2451950","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Testing for Staphylococcus aureus (SA) colonization in emergency department (ED) patients may guide prevention strategies against hospital acquired infections (HAI). This study determined the prevalence of SA carriers in a general ED population, characterized the population, and identified predictors for SA colonization.

Methods: A prospective monocentric observational cohort study in a tertiary care hospital collected nasopharyngeal swabs in 1,000 adult patients. PCR testing for methicillin resistant and methicillin sensitive SA (MRSA/MSSA) was performed. Risk factor questionnaires and routine data from the clinical information system were captured. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression models were applied to report prevalence and outcomes and to identify predictors.

Results: The prevalence for SA was 33.7% (n = 328; 95%-CI: 30.7-36.8): MSSA 30.9% (n = 301; 95%-CI: 28.0-34.0) and MRSA 2.8% (n = 27; 95%-CI: 1.8-4.0). POC PCR testing in the ED was feasible. Key predictors of SA colonization included having a catheter (OR 2.0, 95%-CI 1.0-4.0, p = 0.044) and requiring nursing care (OR 1.9, 95%-CI: 1.2-2.9, p = 0.007), even after adjusting for age and sex.

Conclusion: Testing strategies for SA detection in ED need to focus on vulnerable populations with an elevated risk for HAIs and associated adverse outcomes. Individuals requiring nursing care could be a key target population for screening efforts.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomarkers
Biomarkers 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
140
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Biomarkers brings together all aspects of the rapidly growing field of biomarker research, encompassing their various uses and applications in one essential source. Biomarkers provides a vital forum for the exchange of ideas and concepts in all areas of biomarker research. High quality papers in four main areas are accepted and manuscripts describing novel biomarkers and their subsequent validation are especially encouraged: • Biomarkers of disease • Biomarkers of exposure • Biomarkers of response • Biomarkers of susceptibility Manuscripts can describe biomarkers measured in humans or other animals in vivo or in vitro. Biomarkers will consider publishing negative data from studies of biomarkers of susceptibility in human populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信