Mathieu Capdevila, Joris Pensier, Audrey De Jong, Boris Jung, July Beghin, Thomas Laumon, Yassir Aarab, Lucas Deffontis, Thomas Sfara, Ambre Cuny, Julie Carr, Nicolas Molinari, Jean-Yves Le Guennec, Fabrice Raynaud, Stefan Matecki, Laurent Brochard, Alain Lacampagne, Samir Jaber
{"title":"Impact of under-assisted ventilation on diaphragm function and structure in a porcine model.","authors":"Mathieu Capdevila, Joris Pensier, Audrey De Jong, Boris Jung, July Beghin, Thomas Laumon, Yassir Aarab, Lucas Deffontis, Thomas Sfara, Ambre Cuny, Julie Carr, Nicolas Molinari, Jean-Yves Le Guennec, Fabrice Raynaud, Stefan Matecki, Laurent Brochard, Alain Lacampagne, Samir Jaber","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) in intensive care unit (ICU) induces ventilatory-induced-diaphragm-dysfunction (VIDD). The transition from CMV to assisted mechanical ventilation is a challenge that requires clinicians to balance over-assistance and under-assistance. While the effects of over-assistance on the diaphragm are well known, we aimed to assess the impact of under-assistance on diaphragm function and structure in piglet model with pre-existing VIDD (after long-term CMV) or without VIDD (short-term CMV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two Large-White female piglets were anesthetized, ventilated, and separated into two groups: a VIDD group (n=10) with long-term 72-hour CMV, and a no-VIDD group (n=12) with short-term 2-hour CMV. After sedation reduction at the end of CMV period, each piglet was switched to under-assisted ventilation for 2 hours. Diaphragm function (supramaximal diaphragm pressure-generating capacity assessed by negative tracheal pressure after transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation) and diaphragm structure (mini-invasive in vivo biopsies) were assessed before and after under-assisted ventilation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In VIDD group, supramaximal diaphragm pressure-generating capacity decreased by 22% from 69.9±12.7 to 54.9±19.7 cmH2O (p=0.04) after 72 hours of CMV evidencing VIDD, then dropped by a further 29% from 54.9±19.7 to 38.9±15.5 cmH2O (p<0.01) after 2 hours of under-assisted ventilation. Diaphragm pressure-generating capacity remains stable from 55.3±22.7 to 58.2±24 cmH2O (p=0.24) in no-VIDD group. Diaphragm structure showed sarcomeric injuries increase from 13±10% to 24±19% (p<0.01) and lipid droplets decrease from 14±8% to 11±6% (p=0.03) of the total micrograph area after 2 hours of under-assisted ventilation in the VIDD group. Sarcomeric injuries and lipid droplets accounted respectively for 17±16% and 2±3% of the total micrograph area after under-assisted ventilation in the no-VIDD group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this porcine model, a short two-hour exposure of under-assisted ventilation induces impairment of diaphragm function with damage to the diaphragm structure in ICU condition with pre-existing VIDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005390","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Long-term controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) in intensive care unit (ICU) induces ventilatory-induced-diaphragm-dysfunction (VIDD). The transition from CMV to assisted mechanical ventilation is a challenge that requires clinicians to balance over-assistance and under-assistance. While the effects of over-assistance on the diaphragm are well known, we aimed to assess the impact of under-assistance on diaphragm function and structure in piglet model with pre-existing VIDD (after long-term CMV) or without VIDD (short-term CMV).
Methods: Twenty-two Large-White female piglets were anesthetized, ventilated, and separated into two groups: a VIDD group (n=10) with long-term 72-hour CMV, and a no-VIDD group (n=12) with short-term 2-hour CMV. After sedation reduction at the end of CMV period, each piglet was switched to under-assisted ventilation for 2 hours. Diaphragm function (supramaximal diaphragm pressure-generating capacity assessed by negative tracheal pressure after transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation) and diaphragm structure (mini-invasive in vivo biopsies) were assessed before and after under-assisted ventilation.
Results: In VIDD group, supramaximal diaphragm pressure-generating capacity decreased by 22% from 69.9±12.7 to 54.9±19.7 cmH2O (p=0.04) after 72 hours of CMV evidencing VIDD, then dropped by a further 29% from 54.9±19.7 to 38.9±15.5 cmH2O (p<0.01) after 2 hours of under-assisted ventilation. Diaphragm pressure-generating capacity remains stable from 55.3±22.7 to 58.2±24 cmH2O (p=0.24) in no-VIDD group. Diaphragm structure showed sarcomeric injuries increase from 13±10% to 24±19% (p<0.01) and lipid droplets decrease from 14±8% to 11±6% (p=0.03) of the total micrograph area after 2 hours of under-assisted ventilation in the VIDD group. Sarcomeric injuries and lipid droplets accounted respectively for 17±16% and 2±3% of the total micrograph area after under-assisted ventilation in the no-VIDD group.
Conclusions: In this porcine model, a short two-hour exposure of under-assisted ventilation induces impairment of diaphragm function with damage to the diaphragm structure in ICU condition with pre-existing VIDD.
期刊介绍:
With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.