The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) as a predictor for extubation success in medical and surgical ICU patients: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Shaykhah M Albashir, Rebecca C Robert, Nalini N Jairath, Christopher B Raub, Omar A Alzumai, Samah Saad Salem
{"title":"The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) as a predictor for extubation success in medical and surgical ICU patients: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Shaykhah M Albashir, Rebecca C Robert, Nalini N Jairath, Christopher B Raub, Omar A Alzumai, Samah Saad Salem","doi":"10.1016/j.hrtlng.2025.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation comprise common life support interventions for patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Premature or delayed extubation increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. Despite following weaning protocols, 10-20 % of patients fail extubation within 48 h. To improve extubation success, predictors such as the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI-the ratio of respiratory rate to tidal volume) are needed. The current RSBI value (<105 breaths/min/L) comes from clinically outdated methods and small samples.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the highest-performing RSBI threshold value associated with extubation success using current weaning protocols in a large sample of medical and surgical ICU patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using secondary data from hospital records, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of the RSBI, measured immediately after a spontaneous breathing trial, was conducted for 1313 mechanically ventilated (≥ 48 h and ≤ 21 days) patients at one hospital in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample of 61.5 % medical and 38.5 % surgical patients included 65 % males with a mean age of 53 years and an extubation failure rate of 12 %. Ideal RSBI threshold values differed by medical and surgical samples. For each sample, the area under the ROC curve approximated 0.5 for the RSBI, and multivariable logistic regression identified a unique set of physiologic parameters to predict successful extubation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RSBI alone demonstrated low diagnostic performance for predicting successful extubation using current weaning protocols. However, results suggest needed updates for RSBI threshold values in current weaning protocols to optimize RSBI use with other predictors for extubation success.</p>","PeriodicalId":55064,"journal":{"name":"Heart & Lung","volume":"70 ","pages":"321-328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart & Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2025.01.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation comprise common life support interventions for patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Premature or delayed extubation increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. Despite following weaning protocols, 10-20 % of patients fail extubation within 48 h. To improve extubation success, predictors such as the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI-the ratio of respiratory rate to tidal volume) are needed. The current RSBI value (<105 breaths/min/L) comes from clinically outdated methods and small samples.

Objective: To identify the highest-performing RSBI threshold value associated with extubation success using current weaning protocols in a large sample of medical and surgical ICU patients.

Methods: Using secondary data from hospital records, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of the RSBI, measured immediately after a spontaneous breathing trial, was conducted for 1313 mechanically ventilated (≥ 48 h and ≤ 21 days) patients at one hospital in Saudi Arabia.

Results: The sample of 61.5 % medical and 38.5 % surgical patients included 65 % males with a mean age of 53 years and an extubation failure rate of 12 %. Ideal RSBI threshold values differed by medical and surgical samples. For each sample, the area under the ROC curve approximated 0.5 for the RSBI, and multivariable logistic regression identified a unique set of physiologic parameters to predict successful extubation.

Conclusion: The RSBI alone demonstrated low diagnostic performance for predicting successful extubation using current weaning protocols. However, results suggest needed updates for RSBI threshold values in current weaning protocols to optimize RSBI use with other predictors for extubation success.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart & Lung
Heart & Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
184
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Heart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and Acute Care, the official publication of The American Association of Heart Failure Nurses, presents original, peer-reviewed articles on techniques, advances, investigations, and observations related to the care of patients with acute and critical illness and patients with chronic cardiac or pulmonary disorders. The Journal''s acute care articles focus on the care of hospitalized patients, including those in the critical and acute care settings. Because most patients who are hospitalized in acute and critical care settings have chronic conditions, we are also interested in the chronically critically ill, the care of patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disorders, their rehabilitation, and disease prevention. The Journal''s heart failure articles focus on all aspects of the care of patients with this condition. Manuscripts that are relevant to populations across the human lifespan are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信