Technology usage and glycaemic outcomes in a single tertiary centre with an ethnically diverse and socioeconomically deprived cohort of children with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare Pub Date : 2025-01-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1417287
India Dickinson, Ankita Gupta, Gar Mun Lau, Pranav Viswanath Iyer, John Stuart Pemberton, Suma Uday
{"title":"Technology usage and glycaemic outcomes in a single tertiary centre with an ethnically diverse and socioeconomically deprived cohort of children with type 1 diabetes mellitus.","authors":"India Dickinson, Ankita Gupta, Gar Mun Lau, Pranav Viswanath Iyer, John Stuart Pemberton, Suma Uday","doi":"10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1417287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The UK National Paediatric Diabetes Audit (NPDA) data reports disparities in Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels among children and young people (CYP) with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), with higher levels in those of Black ethnic background and lower socioeconomic status who have less access to technology. We investigate HbA1c differences in a T1D cohort with higher than national average technology uptake where > 60% come from an ethnic minority and/or socioeconomically deprived population.</p><p><strong>Design & methods: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional study investigating the influence of demographic factors, technology use, and socioeconomic status (SES) on glycaemic outcomes. The study population was 222 CYP with T1D who attended the diabetes clinic in 2022 at a single tertiary paediatric diabetes centre.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 222 CYP, 60% were of ethnic minority (Asian, Black, Mixed and Other were 32%, 12%, 6% and 10% respectively) and 40% of white heritage. 94% used Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) and 60% used Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) via open or closed loop. 6% used Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) and Multiple Daily Injections (MDI), 34% used CGM and MDI, 38% used CGM and CSII and 22% used Hybrid Closed-Loop (HCL) systems. Significant differences in HbA1c across therapy groups (p < 0.001) was noted with lowest HbA1c in HCL group (55 mmol/mol; p <0.001). Despite adjusting for therapy type, the Black group had higher HbA1c than their white and Asian counterparts (p<0.001). CYP from the most deprived tertile had significantly higher HbA1c levels (p < 0.001) but the difference was not sustained after adjusting for therapy type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advanced diabetes technologies improve glycaemic control. Whilst equalising technology access mitigates socioeconomic disparities in HbA1c, CYP from Black ethnic background continue to display a higher HbA1c. The study underscores the necessity of fair technology distribution and further research into elevated HbA1c levels among Black CYP using advanced diabetes technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":73075,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","volume":"5 ","pages":"1417287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754227/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1417287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The UK National Paediatric Diabetes Audit (NPDA) data reports disparities in Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels among children and young people (CYP) with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), with higher levels in those of Black ethnic background and lower socioeconomic status who have less access to technology. We investigate HbA1c differences in a T1D cohort with higher than national average technology uptake where > 60% come from an ethnic minority and/or socioeconomically deprived population.

Design & methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study investigating the influence of demographic factors, technology use, and socioeconomic status (SES) on glycaemic outcomes. The study population was 222 CYP with T1D who attended the diabetes clinic in 2022 at a single tertiary paediatric diabetes centre.

Results: Among 222 CYP, 60% were of ethnic minority (Asian, Black, Mixed and Other were 32%, 12%, 6% and 10% respectively) and 40% of white heritage. 94% used Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) and 60% used Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) via open or closed loop. 6% used Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) and Multiple Daily Injections (MDI), 34% used CGM and MDI, 38% used CGM and CSII and 22% used Hybrid Closed-Loop (HCL) systems. Significant differences in HbA1c across therapy groups (p < 0.001) was noted with lowest HbA1c in HCL group (55 mmol/mol; p <0.001). Despite adjusting for therapy type, the Black group had higher HbA1c than their white and Asian counterparts (p<0.001). CYP from the most deprived tertile had significantly higher HbA1c levels (p < 0.001) but the difference was not sustained after adjusting for therapy type.

Conclusion: Advanced diabetes technologies improve glycaemic control. Whilst equalising technology access mitigates socioeconomic disparities in HbA1c, CYP from Black ethnic background continue to display a higher HbA1c. The study underscores the necessity of fair technology distribution and further research into elevated HbA1c levels among Black CYP using advanced diabetes technology.

技术使用和1型糖尿病儿童的血糖结局在单一三级医疗中心的不同种族和社会经济贫困队列。
背景:英国国家儿科糖尿病审计(NPDA)数据报告了儿童和青少年(CYP) 1型糖尿病(T1D)患者血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)水平的差异,黑人种族背景和社会经济地位较低且较少获得技术的人群中血红蛋白A1c水平较高。我们研究了T1D队列中HbA1c的差异,这些队列的HbA1c高于全国平均水平,其中60%来自少数民族和/或社会经济贫困人口。设计与方法:回顾性横断面研究,调查人口统计学因素、技术使用和社会经济地位(SES)对血糖结局的影响。研究人群为222名患有T1D的CYP患者,他们于2022年在一家三级儿科糖尿病中心的糖尿病诊所就诊。结果:222名CYP中,少数族裔占60%(亚裔、黑人、混血儿和其他族裔分别占32%、12%、6%和10%),白人占40%。94%的患者使用连续血糖监测(CGM), 60%的患者使用开环或闭环持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)。6%使用自我血糖监测(SMBG)和每日多次注射(MDI), 34%使用CGM和MDI, 38%使用CGM和CSII, 22%使用混合闭环(HCL)系统。各组间HbA1c差异显著(p < 0.001), HCL组最低(55 mmol/mol;结论:先进的糖尿病技术可改善血糖控制。虽然平等的技术获取减轻了HbA1c的社会经济差异,但黑人种族背景的CYP仍然显示出更高的HbA1c。该研究强调了公平技术分配的必要性,并利用先进的糖尿病技术进一步研究黑色CYP患者的HbA1c水平升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信