The effects of maxillary incisor positions and chin prominences on the perception of lateral smiling profile attractiveness among orthodontists and laypersons.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Korean Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2025-01-25 Epub Date: 2024-10-23 DOI:10.4041/kjod24.152
Pareeya Yongwongsoontorn, Pimsiri Kanpittaya
{"title":"The effects of maxillary incisor positions and chin prominences on the perception of lateral smiling profile attractiveness among orthodontists and laypersons.","authors":"Pareeya Yongwongsoontorn, Pimsiri Kanpittaya","doi":"10.4041/kjod24.152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the ideal anteroposterior position of incisors in lateral smiling profiles with different chin prominences and to relate these positions to nose and chin landmarks based on the perceptions of orthodontists and laypersons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A lateral smiling profile image of a female subject was adjusted to create five levels of chin prominence (-6, -3, 0, +3, +6 mm). For each level, the anteroposterior positions of the maxillary incisors were adjusted across five positions (-4, -2, 0, +2, +4 mm). Thirty-six orthodontists and 36 laypersons rated the attractiveness of each profile using a visual analog scale. The maxillary incisor position (U1) was measured relative to the external nose and chin landmarks (E-lines). Differences in perceptions between orthodontists and laypersons were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For profiles with 6 and 3 mm chin retrusion, the most favored incisor positions were the 2 mm retrusion and unaltered positions, respectively. For the unaltered chin prominence, orthodontists preferred unaltered incisors, while laypersons favored 2 mm protrusion. Conversely, for 3 and 6 mm chin protrusion, both groups preferred 4 and 2 mm protrusion, respectively. The distance between U1 and the E-line is the most attractive images ranged from 8.5 to 11.5 mm. Based on the regression model, an optimal U1-E-line distance of 8.95 mm was recommended.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The preferred incisor position is influenced by chin prominence, with the incisor position shifting in the same direction as the chin. The U1 E-line can be a useful clinical tool for determining the proper incisor positioning. Esthetic perceptions were generally consistent between orthodontists and laypersons.</p>","PeriodicalId":51260,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"55 1","pages":"48-57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788181/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod24.152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the ideal anteroposterior position of incisors in lateral smiling profiles with different chin prominences and to relate these positions to nose and chin landmarks based on the perceptions of orthodontists and laypersons.

Methods: A lateral smiling profile image of a female subject was adjusted to create five levels of chin prominence (-6, -3, 0, +3, +6 mm). For each level, the anteroposterior positions of the maxillary incisors were adjusted across five positions (-4, -2, 0, +2, +4 mm). Thirty-six orthodontists and 36 laypersons rated the attractiveness of each profile using a visual analog scale. The maxillary incisor position (U1) was measured relative to the external nose and chin landmarks (E-lines). Differences in perceptions between orthodontists and laypersons were analyzed.

Results: For profiles with 6 and 3 mm chin retrusion, the most favored incisor positions were the 2 mm retrusion and unaltered positions, respectively. For the unaltered chin prominence, orthodontists preferred unaltered incisors, while laypersons favored 2 mm protrusion. Conversely, for 3 and 6 mm chin protrusion, both groups preferred 4 and 2 mm protrusion, respectively. The distance between U1 and the E-line is the most attractive images ranged from 8.5 to 11.5 mm. Based on the regression model, an optimal U1-E-line distance of 8.95 mm was recommended.

Conclusions: The preferred incisor position is influenced by chin prominence, with the incisor position shifting in the same direction as the chin. The U1 E-line can be a useful clinical tool for determining the proper incisor positioning. Esthetic perceptions were generally consistent between orthodontists and laypersons.

上颌切牙位置和下颌突出位置对正畸医师和门外汉侧面微笑吸引力感知的影响。
目的:在正畸医师和外行人的认知基础上,探讨不同下颌突出度的侧面面切牙的理想前后位,并将其与鼻、颏标志相联系。方法:调整女性受试者的侧面微笑图像,创建五个水平的下巴突出(-6,-3,0,+3,+6 mm)。对于每个水平,上颌切牙的前后位置调整5个位置(-4、-2、0、+2、+4 mm)。36名正畸医生和36名外行人使用视觉模拟量表对每个侧面的吸引力进行评分。上颌切牙位置(U1)相对于外鼻和下巴标志(e线)进行测量。分析正畸医师与门外汉在认知上的差异。结果:对于下颌后缩6 mm和3 mm侧位,切牙位置分别为后缩2 mm和不变位置。对于未改变的颏突,正畸医师倾向于不改变的门牙,而外行人则倾向于2毫米的突出。相反,对于3和6 mm的下巴突出,两组分别偏好4和2 mm的下巴突出。U1与e线之间的距离在8.5 ~ 11.5 mm之间,是最吸引人的图像。基于回归模型,推荐的最佳u1 - e线间距为8.95 mm。结论:切牙的首选位置受颏突的影响,切牙的位置与下颌方向一致。U1 e线可以是一个有用的临床工具,以确定正确的门牙定位。正畸医师与门外汉的审美观大体一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Orthodontics
Korean Journal of Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Korean Journal of Orthodontics (KJO) is an international, open access, peer reviewed journal published in January, March, May, July, September, and November each year. It was first launched in 1970 and, as the official scientific publication of Korean Association of Orthodontists, KJO aims to publish high quality clinical and scientific original research papers in all areas related to orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. Specifically, its interest focuses on evidence-based investigations of contemporary diagnostic procedures and treatment techniques, expanding to significant clinical reports of diverse treatment approaches. The scope of KJO covers all areas of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics including successful diagnostic procedures and treatment planning, growth and development of the face and its clinical implications, appliance designs, biomechanics, TMJ disorders and adult treatment. Specifically, its latest interest focuses on skeletal anchorage devices, orthodontic appliance and biomaterials, 3 dimensional imaging techniques utilized for dentofacial diagnosis and treatment planning, and orthognathic surgery to correct skeletal disharmony in association of orthodontic treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信