What is the learning effect of video review in postgraduate medical education: a systematic review.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Marieke Robbrecht, Myriam Van Winckel, Antonius Mulder, Mieke Embo
{"title":"What is the learning effect of video review in postgraduate medical education: a systematic review.","authors":"Marieke Robbrecht, Myriam Van Winckel, Antonius Mulder, Mieke Embo","doi":"10.1186/s12909-024-06515-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Video review is a feasible, commonly used learning tool, but current literature lacks a comprehensive review of its impact on learning in postgraduate medical education. This systematic review aims at examining the learning effect of video review of resident performance in clinical practice during postgraduate medical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted from May 2023 to July 2023 with an update on 12/12/2023. Databases of MEDLINE (Pubmed), Web of Science, Embase and ERIC (through Webquest) were searched. Eligible articles had to describe the learning effects of video review in clinical practice in postgraduate medical education. The videos had to be actively recorded in a setting where a camera was not normally used for standard patient care. The investigated effect needed to be classified at least as a Kirkpatrick level 2. We iteratively developed a standardized data extraction form to extract study characteristics. The methodological quality of the individual studies was assessed using the Medical Education Research Quality Instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 9323 records after deduplication, 11 studies were included. The designs were randomised controlled trials (n = 4) and single-group pre-test post-tests trials (n = 7). The studies had outcomes related to knowledge and skills (n = 5), resident behaviours (n = 5) and patient outcome (n = 1). All studies reported outcomes regarding learning effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Video review appears to have a positive impact on residents' learning outcomes in postgraduate medical education. However, it is mostly not tailored to the specific learning needs of residents, and there is a lack of information regarding its optimal integration with other learning methods and within distinct clinical contexts. The heterogeneity observed among the included studies makes it challenging to formulate clear recommendations in the use of video.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06515-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Video review is a feasible, commonly used learning tool, but current literature lacks a comprehensive review of its impact on learning in postgraduate medical education. This systematic review aims at examining the learning effect of video review of resident performance in clinical practice during postgraduate medical education.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted from May 2023 to July 2023 with an update on 12/12/2023. Databases of MEDLINE (Pubmed), Web of Science, Embase and ERIC (through Webquest) were searched. Eligible articles had to describe the learning effects of video review in clinical practice in postgraduate medical education. The videos had to be actively recorded in a setting where a camera was not normally used for standard patient care. The investigated effect needed to be classified at least as a Kirkpatrick level 2. We iteratively developed a standardized data extraction form to extract study characteristics. The methodological quality of the individual studies was assessed using the Medical Education Research Quality Instrument.

Results: Out of 9323 records after deduplication, 11 studies were included. The designs were randomised controlled trials (n = 4) and single-group pre-test post-tests trials (n = 7). The studies had outcomes related to knowledge and skills (n = 5), resident behaviours (n = 5) and patient outcome (n = 1). All studies reported outcomes regarding learning effect.

Conclusions: Video review appears to have a positive impact on residents' learning outcomes in postgraduate medical education. However, it is mostly not tailored to the specific learning needs of residents, and there is a lack of information regarding its optimal integration with other learning methods and within distinct clinical contexts. The heterogeneity observed among the included studies makes it challenging to formulate clear recommendations in the use of video.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信