Safety and effectiveness of micropigmentation skin grafting using the Meek method.

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2024-12-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/HFPU3214
Diana Rafieezadeh, Mohammadjavad Abbaspour
{"title":"Safety and effectiveness of micropigmentation skin grafting using the Meek method.","authors":"Diana Rafieezadeh, Mohammadjavad Abbaspour","doi":"10.62347/HFPU3214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The management of complex burn injuries has evolved significantly, with various surgical techniques developed to improve outcomes. This review examines the evolution of these methods, focusing particularly on mesh grafting and the Meek technique. While mesh grafting is effective, it poses challenges such as limited graft coverage and a high demand for autologous skin. In contrast, the Meek technique, a specialized method reintroduced in 1993, offers notable advantages for extensive burns by achieving higher skin expansion ratios of up to 1:9 and reducing the need for large donor sites. The Meek technique uses a meshing device to create tiny perforations in small skin grafts, facilitating their expansion to cover larger wound areas and improving healing outcomes. Recent studies highlight its effectiveness across various burn severities and age groups, especially when combined with Cultured Epithelial Autografts (CEA). Additionally, bioengineering advancements like Biobrane offer temporary skin substitutes to aid burn wound healing in pediatric cases, though they ultimately require replacement with autografts. While the Meek technique presents certain challenges, such as a 6-day delay before applying allografts, it remains a robust alternative to traditional methods. Clinical experience indicates that the Meek technique, particularly when combined with CEA, can achieve superior results for severe burns compared to conventional mesh grafting. This review emphasizes the Meek technique's potential as a valuable tool in burn wound management, offering a promising approach for improving patient outcomes in complex burn injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":"14 6","pages":"107-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/HFPU3214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The management of complex burn injuries has evolved significantly, with various surgical techniques developed to improve outcomes. This review examines the evolution of these methods, focusing particularly on mesh grafting and the Meek technique. While mesh grafting is effective, it poses challenges such as limited graft coverage and a high demand for autologous skin. In contrast, the Meek technique, a specialized method reintroduced in 1993, offers notable advantages for extensive burns by achieving higher skin expansion ratios of up to 1:9 and reducing the need for large donor sites. The Meek technique uses a meshing device to create tiny perforations in small skin grafts, facilitating their expansion to cover larger wound areas and improving healing outcomes. Recent studies highlight its effectiveness across various burn severities and age groups, especially when combined with Cultured Epithelial Autografts (CEA). Additionally, bioengineering advancements like Biobrane offer temporary skin substitutes to aid burn wound healing in pediatric cases, though they ultimately require replacement with autografts. While the Meek technique presents certain challenges, such as a 6-day delay before applying allografts, it remains a robust alternative to traditional methods. Clinical experience indicates that the Meek technique, particularly when combined with CEA, can achieve superior results for severe burns compared to conventional mesh grafting. This review emphasizes the Meek technique's potential as a valuable tool in burn wound management, offering a promising approach for improving patient outcomes in complex burn injuries.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信