A non-inferiority randomized controlled study of Perampanel versus Oxcarbazepine monotherapy for post-stroke epilepsy

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cuihua Yan , Jing Liu , Jing Jiang , Yanping Sun , Juan Chen , Kunkun Wei , Xiaoyun Liu , Qi Xiang , Anru Liu , Yuxiang Han , Liling Yang , Tao Han , Xuewu Liu
{"title":"A non-inferiority randomized controlled study of Perampanel versus Oxcarbazepine monotherapy for post-stroke epilepsy","authors":"Cuihua Yan ,&nbsp;Jing Liu ,&nbsp;Jing Jiang ,&nbsp;Yanping Sun ,&nbsp;Juan Chen ,&nbsp;Kunkun Wei ,&nbsp;Xiaoyun Liu ,&nbsp;Qi Xiang ,&nbsp;Anru Liu ,&nbsp;Yuxiang Han ,&nbsp;Liling Yang ,&nbsp;Tao Han ,&nbsp;Xuewu Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.seizure.2025.01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) poses a significant challenge despite advances in stroke treatment. This study compares the efficacy of the novel anti-seizure medication (ASM) Perampanel with the classical ASM Oxcarbazepine in treating PSE.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective randomized controlled trial recruited PSE patients from September 2022 to January 2024 across multiple hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Perampanel or Oxcarbazepine monotherapy. Baseline seizure frequency was measured over three months prior to treatment. Efficacy was assessed at six months, with <em>a</em> ≥ 50 % reduction in seizure frequency deemed effective. Perampanel was considered non-inferior to Oxcarbazepine if its lower 95 % confidence limit for efficacy was above 80 % of Oxcarbazepine's six-month seizure freedom rate. Intention-to-treat analysis and Kaplan-Meier methods evaluated retention rates and side effects.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 67 patients were included in this study: 33 patients in the Perampanel group (26 males, 78.8 %; 7 females, 21.2 %) and 34 patients in the Oxcarbazepine group (26 males, 76.5 %; 8 females, 23.5 %). There were no statistically significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups. This indicates that the groups are comparable. Treatment efficacy was 75.0 % and 78.8 % in the Perampanel and Oxcarbazepine groups at three months, and 80.6 % and 75.0 % at six months, respectively. At six months, the lower limit of the 95 % confidence interval for efficacy in the Perampanel group was higher than the prespecified non-inferiority threshold, indicating that Perampanel was noninferior than Oxcarbazepine. The rates of drug retention and adverse effects were similar in the two groups, with no statistically significant difference (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Perampanel is noninferior to Oxcarbazepine and is considered a good option for the management of post-stroke epilepsy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49552,"journal":{"name":"Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy","volume":"125 ","pages":"Pages 172-178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059131125000226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) poses a significant challenge despite advances in stroke treatment. This study compares the efficacy of the novel anti-seizure medication (ASM) Perampanel with the classical ASM Oxcarbazepine in treating PSE.

Methods

This prospective randomized controlled trial recruited PSE patients from September 2022 to January 2024 across multiple hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Perampanel or Oxcarbazepine monotherapy. Baseline seizure frequency was measured over three months prior to treatment. Efficacy was assessed at six months, with a ≥ 50 % reduction in seizure frequency deemed effective. Perampanel was considered non-inferior to Oxcarbazepine if its lower 95 % confidence limit for efficacy was above 80 % of Oxcarbazepine's six-month seizure freedom rate. Intention-to-treat analysis and Kaplan-Meier methods evaluated retention rates and side effects.

Results

A total of 67 patients were included in this study: 33 patients in the Perampanel group (26 males, 78.8 %; 7 females, 21.2 %) and 34 patients in the Oxcarbazepine group (26 males, 76.5 %; 8 females, 23.5 %). There were no statistically significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups. This indicates that the groups are comparable. Treatment efficacy was 75.0 % and 78.8 % in the Perampanel and Oxcarbazepine groups at three months, and 80.6 % and 75.0 % at six months, respectively. At six months, the lower limit of the 95 % confidence interval for efficacy in the Perampanel group was higher than the prespecified non-inferiority threshold, indicating that Perampanel was noninferior than Oxcarbazepine. The rates of drug retention and adverse effects were similar in the two groups, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Perampanel is noninferior to Oxcarbazepine and is considered a good option for the management of post-stroke epilepsy.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy
Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
231
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Seizure - European Journal of Epilepsy is an international journal owned by Epilepsy Action (the largest member led epilepsy organisation in the UK). It provides a forum for papers on all topics related to epilepsy and seizure disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信