Preventing Underage Tobacco Access: A Cross-Sectional Study of Retailer Training in Southern Illinois.

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Luke Manietta, Chesmi Kumbalatara, Jennifer Rhodes, Hend Jadalla, Wasantha Jayawardene
{"title":"Preventing Underage Tobacco Access: A Cross-Sectional Study of Retailer Training in Southern Illinois.","authors":"Luke Manietta, Chesmi Kumbalatara, Jennifer Rhodes, Hend Jadalla, Wasantha Jayawardene","doi":"10.1177/15248399241311842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>. Stringent regulations restricting tobacco access to those under 21 are in place, yet young people continue accessing tobacco products. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, opinions, resource utilization, and training needs of tobacco retailers in terms of preventing underage tobacco sales. <i>Methodology</i>. This cross-sectional study analyzed anonymized responses from 467 licensed tobacco retailers in 16 southern counties of Illinois. The survey included 29 questions adapted from validated items, utilized a hybrid methodology (online and in-person), and targeted both retail store owners and managers. <i>Results</i>. Among 118 respondents, 98.3% were aware of the Tobacco-21 law, but 56.8% doubted its impact on reducing underage sales. Gaps in knowledge persisted, especially regarding policies and enforcement laws for Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS). Overall, there was a disparity in preventive measures and program utilization with a low engagement in rural areas and smaller stores. Approximately 48.3% encountered older youths attempting to purchase tobacco. Most respondents (72.9%) supported training for newly hired clerks, focusing on underage sales refusal (54.2%) and ID verification (62.7%). Nearly half (44.9%) felt the need for training in handling aggressive young buyers. The main barrier to training was time constraints for in-person sessions (28.0%), although 41.5% reported no barriers. While \"We Card\" was widely used (82.2%), only 38.5% displayed the FDA's \"This is Our Watch.\" <i>Conclusion</i>. A discrepancy exists between awareness and effective practice among retailers, especially in rural areas and smaller establishments. Findings highlighted the need for targeted retailer training and resource utilization to combat underage tobacco access.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399241311842"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399241311842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Stringent regulations restricting tobacco access to those under 21 are in place, yet young people continue accessing tobacco products. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, opinions, resource utilization, and training needs of tobacco retailers in terms of preventing underage tobacco sales. Methodology. This cross-sectional study analyzed anonymized responses from 467 licensed tobacco retailers in 16 southern counties of Illinois. The survey included 29 questions adapted from validated items, utilized a hybrid methodology (online and in-person), and targeted both retail store owners and managers. Results. Among 118 respondents, 98.3% were aware of the Tobacco-21 law, but 56.8% doubted its impact on reducing underage sales. Gaps in knowledge persisted, especially regarding policies and enforcement laws for Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS). Overall, there was a disparity in preventive measures and program utilization with a low engagement in rural areas and smaller stores. Approximately 48.3% encountered older youths attempting to purchase tobacco. Most respondents (72.9%) supported training for newly hired clerks, focusing on underage sales refusal (54.2%) and ID verification (62.7%). Nearly half (44.9%) felt the need for training in handling aggressive young buyers. The main barrier to training was time constraints for in-person sessions (28.0%), although 41.5% reported no barriers. While "We Card" was widely used (82.2%), only 38.5% displayed the FDA's "This is Our Watch." Conclusion. A discrepancy exists between awareness and effective practice among retailers, especially in rural areas and smaller establishments. Findings highlighted the need for targeted retailer training and resource utilization to combat underage tobacco access.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信