Developing evidence for a national strategy for older adults in the criminal justice system: overview of the nominal group approach for this series of brief reports.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/14789949.2024.2438882
Adam O'Neill, Jennifer Shaw, Leanne Heathcote, Thomas Hewson, Lee Mulligan, Louise Robinson, Anna Newton-Clarke, Ellie Thompson, Evelyn Wong, Kim Barnett, Fiona Lerigo, Jana Bowden, Kerry Gutridge, Matilda Minchin, Dawn Edge, Stuart Ware, Rhian Falvey, Catherine A Robinson, Jane Senior, Katrina Forsyth
{"title":"Developing evidence for a national strategy for older adults in the criminal justice system: overview of the nominal group approach for this series of brief reports.","authors":"Adam O'Neill, Jennifer Shaw, Leanne Heathcote, Thomas Hewson, Lee Mulligan, Louise Robinson, Anna Newton-Clarke, Ellie Thompson, Evelyn Wong, Kim Barnett, Fiona Lerigo, Jana Bowden, Kerry Gutridge, Matilda Minchin, Dawn Edge, Stuart Ware, Rhian Falvey, Catherine A Robinson, Jane Senior, Katrina Forsyth","doi":"10.1080/14789949.2024.2438882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The number of people aged 50 and over entering the criminal justice system (CJS) in England and Wales is growing. This raises questions as to the suitability of the CJS to equitably accommodate individuals with complex illness or impairment, who might experience difficulties in cognitive function, frailty, and/or impaired mobility. Findings from the government, the third sector, and academic literature have highlighted the difficulties experienced by older adults in the CJS and those tasked with supporting them. To inform the development of the Ministry of Justice's national strategy for older people in prison, we conducted a series of nominal focus groups with policy makers, practitioners, prison staff, representatives from the third sector, and academics, each focusing on a specific topic area that impacts older adults in prison. These were: 1) older adult trajectories; 2) long term conditions; 3) dementia; 4) mental health; 5) social care; 6) end of life care; 7) women; 8) ethnicity; and 9) COVID-19. An additional nominal group was also held with older adults currently in prison to discuss what they thought should be included in the national strategy more broadly. This paper presents the methodology of the nominal groups and subsequent analysis, as well as providing a rationale for the research. It serves as a precursor to a series of papers reporting and discussing the findings of the topic-specific nominal groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":47524,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology","volume":"36 1","pages":"105-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2024.2438882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number of people aged 50 and over entering the criminal justice system (CJS) in England and Wales is growing. This raises questions as to the suitability of the CJS to equitably accommodate individuals with complex illness or impairment, who might experience difficulties in cognitive function, frailty, and/or impaired mobility. Findings from the government, the third sector, and academic literature have highlighted the difficulties experienced by older adults in the CJS and those tasked with supporting them. To inform the development of the Ministry of Justice's national strategy for older people in prison, we conducted a series of nominal focus groups with policy makers, practitioners, prison staff, representatives from the third sector, and academics, each focusing on a specific topic area that impacts older adults in prison. These were: 1) older adult trajectories; 2) long term conditions; 3) dementia; 4) mental health; 5) social care; 6) end of life care; 7) women; 8) ethnicity; and 9) COVID-19. An additional nominal group was also held with older adults currently in prison to discuss what they thought should be included in the national strategy more broadly. This paper presents the methodology of the nominal groups and subsequent analysis, as well as providing a rationale for the research. It serves as a precursor to a series of papers reporting and discussing the findings of the topic-specific nominal groups.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信