A safe and effective treatment for refractory malignant ascites: the use of pigtail catheters.

Polish journal of radiology Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5114/pjr/194651
Akif Doğan, Ömer Aydıner
{"title":"A safe and effective treatment for refractory malignant ascites: the use of pigtail catheters.","authors":"Akif Doğan, Ömer Aydıner","doi":"10.5114/pjr/194651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Recurrent malignant ascites is a common and challenging condition in cancer patients, often lacking a standardized treatment protocol. Small-scale studies in the literature have been insufficient to establish a treatment standard. The aim of our study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of pigtail peritoneal catheter application in the treatment of malignant ascites.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who had pigtail catheters inserted between January 2017 and December 2022. The study focused on the success rate of the procedure, catheter dwell time, complication rates, and the factors influencing these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 196 patients, 102 of whom were female, with malignant ascites were included in the study. The median age was 65.5 years. The procedure had a 100% success rate, with no procedure-related deaths or major complications. The overall minor complication rate, including bleeding, minor cellulitis, leakage, and blockage, was 52%. Patients with comorbidities experienced statistically significantly more complications (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The median catheter dwell time was 31 days (range: 3-181 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pigtail peritoneal catheters provide effective and safe minimally invasive fluid drainage for the treatment of malignant ascites. The most critical factors for preventing procedure-related complications and ensuring procedural success include proper indication, correct timing, procedural expertise, and the involvement of well-trained patients and caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":"89 ","pages":"e561-e565"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr/194651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Recurrent malignant ascites is a common and challenging condition in cancer patients, often lacking a standardized treatment protocol. Small-scale studies in the literature have been insufficient to establish a treatment standard. The aim of our study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of pigtail peritoneal catheter application in the treatment of malignant ascites.

Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who had pigtail catheters inserted between January 2017 and December 2022. The study focused on the success rate of the procedure, catheter dwell time, complication rates, and the factors influencing these outcomes.

Results: A total of 196 patients, 102 of whom were female, with malignant ascites were included in the study. The median age was 65.5 years. The procedure had a 100% success rate, with no procedure-related deaths or major complications. The overall minor complication rate, including bleeding, minor cellulitis, leakage, and blockage, was 52%. Patients with comorbidities experienced statistically significantly more complications (p < 0.05). The median catheter dwell time was 31 days (range: 3-181 days).

Conclusions: Pigtail peritoneal catheters provide effective and safe minimally invasive fluid drainage for the treatment of malignant ascites. The most critical factors for preventing procedure-related complications and ensuring procedural success include proper indication, correct timing, procedural expertise, and the involvement of well-trained patients and caregivers.

Abstract Image

一种安全有效的治疗顽固性恶性腹水的方法:使用尾纤导管。
目的:复发性恶性腹水是癌症患者中一种常见且具有挑战性的疾病,通常缺乏标准化的治疗方案。文献中的小规模研究不足以建立治疗标准。我们的研究目的是探讨猪尾腹膜导管在恶性腹水治疗中的有效性和安全性。材料和方法:我们对2017年1月至2022年12月期间插入辫状导尿管的患者进行回顾性分析。研究的重点是手术成功率、导管停留时间、并发症发生率以及影响这些结果的因素。结果:共纳入196例恶性腹水患者,其中女性102例。中位年龄为65.5岁。手术成功率为100%,无手术相关死亡或重大并发症。总体轻微并发症发生率,包括出血、轻微蜂窝织炎、渗漏和阻塞,为52%。合并合并症患者并发症发生率明显高于对照组(p < 0.05)。置管时间中位数为31天(范围:3 ~ 181天)。结论:猪尾式腹膜导管是治疗恶性腹水的一种安全有效的微创引流方法。预防手术相关并发症和确保手术成功的最关键因素包括适当的指征、正确的时机、手术专业知识以及训练有素的患者和护理人员的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信