Evaluation of leukocyte depletion of packed red blood cells for the prevention of clinically observed transfusion reactions at a medical center in Eastern Taiwan.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tzu Chi Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_47_24
Kai-Yun Su, Jing-Chun Huang, Jing-Yi Lin, Chun-Chun Chang
{"title":"Evaluation of leukocyte depletion of packed red blood cells for the prevention of clinically observed transfusion reactions at a medical center in Eastern Taiwan.","authors":"Kai-Yun Su, Jing-Chun Huang, Jing-Yi Lin, Chun-Chun Chang","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_47_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The incidence of febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTRs) is correlated with the level of cytokines released by donor leukocytes in blood bags during storage, which is the most common transfusion reaction. The study aimed to reveal whether the use of leukocyte-poor red blood cells (LPRBCs) can reduce the incidence of transfusion reactions to promote patient safety.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From January 2014 to June 2022, 158,122 blood transfusion reports were collected from a medical center in Eastern Taiwan. Data were categorized into three groups according to usage: prepromotion use of LPRBCs (January 2014-April 2016), promotion use of LPRBCs (May 2016 to February 2018), and full utilization of LPRBCs (March 2018 to June 2022). According to the American Association of Blood Bank Common Transfusion Reaction Reporting Form version 2.0 reporting system, FNHTRs were classified as moderate transfusion reactions. We used these data to analyze the association between LPRBC use and transfusion reaction rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At our hospital, the LPRBC usage rate from January 2014 to April 2016, May 2016 to February 2018, and March 2018 to June 2022 was 5.37%, 34.82%, and 56.45%, respectively. The total transfusion reaction rate from January 2014 to April 2016 was 1.66%, whereas the moderate reaction rate was 1.29%. The total transfusion and moderate reaction rates from May 2016 to February 2018 were 1.41% and 1.00%, whereas those from March 2018 to June 2022 were 0.95% and 0.63%, respectively. The total transfusion and moderate reaction rates from March 2018 to June 2022 decreased by 42.8% and 51.2%, respectively, compared with those from January 2014 to April 2016. We further compared the incidence of transfusion reactions caused by packed red blood cells (PRBC) and LPRBC products in different years. The results showed that between 2014 and 2022, the types of blood transfusion reaction caused using PRBC and LPRBC products are the mild transfusion reaction rate of 0.20%/0.20%, the moderate transfusion reaction rate of 1.61%/0.69%, the severe transfusion reaction rates 0.38%/0.16%, and the total transfusion reaction rates 2.19%/1.05%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study results indicate that both total transfusion and moderate reaction rates significantly decreased with increasing LPRBC usage rate. Based on our data analysis, LPRBC is more effective in reducing moderate and severe transfusion reactions than PRBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":45873,"journal":{"name":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":"109-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_47_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The incidence of febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTRs) is correlated with the level of cytokines released by donor leukocytes in blood bags during storage, which is the most common transfusion reaction. The study aimed to reveal whether the use of leukocyte-poor red blood cells (LPRBCs) can reduce the incidence of transfusion reactions to promote patient safety.

Materials and methods: From January 2014 to June 2022, 158,122 blood transfusion reports were collected from a medical center in Eastern Taiwan. Data were categorized into three groups according to usage: prepromotion use of LPRBCs (January 2014-April 2016), promotion use of LPRBCs (May 2016 to February 2018), and full utilization of LPRBCs (March 2018 to June 2022). According to the American Association of Blood Bank Common Transfusion Reaction Reporting Form version 2.0 reporting system, FNHTRs were classified as moderate transfusion reactions. We used these data to analyze the association between LPRBC use and transfusion reaction rate.

Results: At our hospital, the LPRBC usage rate from January 2014 to April 2016, May 2016 to February 2018, and March 2018 to June 2022 was 5.37%, 34.82%, and 56.45%, respectively. The total transfusion reaction rate from January 2014 to April 2016 was 1.66%, whereas the moderate reaction rate was 1.29%. The total transfusion and moderate reaction rates from May 2016 to February 2018 were 1.41% and 1.00%, whereas those from March 2018 to June 2022 were 0.95% and 0.63%, respectively. The total transfusion and moderate reaction rates from March 2018 to June 2022 decreased by 42.8% and 51.2%, respectively, compared with those from January 2014 to April 2016. We further compared the incidence of transfusion reactions caused by packed red blood cells (PRBC) and LPRBC products in different years. The results showed that between 2014 and 2022, the types of blood transfusion reaction caused using PRBC and LPRBC products are the mild transfusion reaction rate of 0.20%/0.20%, the moderate transfusion reaction rate of 1.61%/0.69%, the severe transfusion reaction rates 0.38%/0.16%, and the total transfusion reaction rates 2.19%/1.05%.

Conclusion: Our study results indicate that both total transfusion and moderate reaction rates significantly decreased with increasing LPRBC usage rate. Based on our data analysis, LPRBC is more effective in reducing moderate and severe transfusion reactions than PRBC.

在台湾东部某医疗中心,白血球耗尽对预防输血反应之评估。
目的:发热性非溶血性输血反应(FNHTRs)的发生率与血袋贮存期间供体白细胞释放的细胞因子水平相关,是最常见的输血反应。该研究旨在揭示使用白细胞贫乏的红细胞(lprbc)是否可以减少输血反应的发生率,从而促进患者的安全。材料与方法:收集2014年1月至2022年6月台湾东部某医疗中心输血报告158122份。根据使用情况将数据分为三组:促销前使用lprbc(2014年1月- 2016年4月),促销使用lprbc(2016年5月至2018年2月)和充分利用lprbc(2018年3月至2022年6月)。根据美国血库协会常见输血反应报告表2.0版报告系统,FNHTRs被归类为中度输血反应。我们使用这些数据来分析LPRBC使用与输血反应率之间的关系。结果:我院2014年1月- 2016年4月、2016年5月- 2018年2月、2018年3月- 2022年6月LPRBC使用率分别为5.37%、34.82%、56.45%。2014年1月至2016年4月输血总反应率为1.66%,中度反应率为1.29%。2016年5月至2018年2月总输血率和中度反应率分别为1.41%和1.00%,2018年3月至2022年6月总输血率和中度反应率分别为0.95%和0.63%。2018年3月至2022年6月,总输血率和中度反应率较2014年1月至2016年4月分别下降42.8%和51.2%。我们进一步比较了不同年份填充红细胞(PRBC)和LPRBC产品引起的输血反应的发生率。结果表明,2014 - 2022年,使用PRBC和LPRBC产品引起的输血反应类型为轻度输血反应率0.20%/0.20%,中度输血反应率1.61%/0.69%,重度输血反应率0.38%/0.16%,总输血反应率2.19%/1.05%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,随着LPRBC使用率的增加,总输血率和中度反应率均显著降低。根据我们的数据分析,LPRBC在减少中度和重度输血反应方面比PRBC更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Tzu Chi Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Tzu Chi Medical Journal is the peer-reviewed publication of the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation, and includes original research papers on clinical medicine and basic science, case reports, clinical pathological pages, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信