Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for patients aged ninety and older with choledocholithiasis: A single-center experience in south China.

IF 1.8 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Lei Wang, Zi-Ye Li, Fan Wu, Guo-Qian Tan, Bai-Lin Wang
{"title":"Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for patients aged ninety and older with choledocholithiasis: A single-center experience in south China.","authors":"Lei Wang, Zi-Ye Li, Fan Wu, Guo-Qian Tan, Bai-Lin Wang","doi":"10.4253/wjge.v17.i1.102010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) serves an essential role in treating biliary diseases, especially in choledocholithiasis. However, due to the limited human lifespan, there remains a paucity of clinical investigations on ERCP treatment in patients over 90 years old.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the effectiveness and safety of ERCP in super-older patients aged ≥ 90 years with choledochal stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively analyzed data from patients (aged ≥ 65 years) with choledocholithiasis who received ERCP treatment in our hospital from 2011 to 2023. Among them, patients ≥ 90 years old were in the super-older group, and patients aged 65-89 years were in the older group. Baseline data, including gender, number of stones, stone size, gallbladder stones, periampullary diverticulum, and common bile duct intubation of patients in the two groups, were matched by adopting the 1:1 propensity score matching method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 44 patients were included in both the super-older group and the older group. The incidence of stroke in the super-older group was markedly higher than that in the older group [34.1% (15/44) <i>vs</i> 6.8% (3/44), <i>P</i> = 0.008]. The success rate of the ERCP procedure in the super-older group was 90.9% (40/44), compared to that in the older group [93.2% (41/44), <i>P</i> = 1.000]. Although endoscopic papillary balloon dilation was more frequently used in the super-older group than in the older group [61.4% (27/44) <i>vs</i> 18.2% (8/44), <i>P</i> < 0.001], there was no significant difference in terms of stone removal rate, the incidence of complications, mortality, recurrence, and length of hospitalization between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ERCP is safe and effective in super-older patients ≥ 90 years old with choledocholithiasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23953,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"17 1","pages":"102010"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i1.102010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) serves an essential role in treating biliary diseases, especially in choledocholithiasis. However, due to the limited human lifespan, there remains a paucity of clinical investigations on ERCP treatment in patients over 90 years old.

Aim: To explore the effectiveness and safety of ERCP in super-older patients aged ≥ 90 years with choledochal stones.

Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed data from patients (aged ≥ 65 years) with choledocholithiasis who received ERCP treatment in our hospital from 2011 to 2023. Among them, patients ≥ 90 years old were in the super-older group, and patients aged 65-89 years were in the older group. Baseline data, including gender, number of stones, stone size, gallbladder stones, periampullary diverticulum, and common bile duct intubation of patients in the two groups, were matched by adopting the 1:1 propensity score matching method.

Results: After matching, 44 patients were included in both the super-older group and the older group. The incidence of stroke in the super-older group was markedly higher than that in the older group [34.1% (15/44) vs 6.8% (3/44), P = 0.008]. The success rate of the ERCP procedure in the super-older group was 90.9% (40/44), compared to that in the older group [93.2% (41/44), P = 1.000]. Although endoscopic papillary balloon dilation was more frequently used in the super-older group than in the older group [61.4% (27/44) vs 18.2% (8/44), P < 0.001], there was no significant difference in terms of stone removal rate, the incidence of complications, mortality, recurrence, and length of hospitalization between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: ERCP is safe and effective in super-older patients ≥ 90 years old with choledocholithiasis.

内镜逆行胆管造影治疗90岁及以上胆总管结石患者:华南地区单中心经验。
背景:内镜逆行胆管造影术(ERCP)在胆道疾病,特别是胆总管结石的治疗中起着重要作用。然而,由于人的寿命有限,对90岁以上患者ERCP治疗的临床研究仍然缺乏。目的:探讨ERCP治疗≥90岁高龄胆总管结石患者的有效性和安全性。方法:本研究回顾性分析我院2011 - 2023年接受ERCP治疗的胆总管结石患者(年龄≥65岁)的资料。其中年龄≥90岁的患者为超高龄组,65 ~ 89岁的患者为高龄组。采用1:1倾向评分匹配法对两组患者的性别、结石数量、结石大小、胆囊结石、壶腹周围憩室、胆总管插管等基线资料进行匹配。结果:匹配后,44例患者同时分为超高龄组和高龄组。超高龄组脑卒中发生率明显高于高龄组[34.1% (15/44)vs 6.8% (3/44), P = 0.008]。超高龄组ERCP手术成功率为90.9%(40/44),老年组为93.2% (41/44),P = 1.000。虽然超高龄组使用内镜下乳头状球囊扩张术的频率高于老年组[61.4% (27/44)vs 18.2% (8/44), P < 0.001],但两组在结石取出率、并发症发生率、死亡率、复发率、住院时间等方面差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:ERCP治疗≥90岁高龄胆总管结石患者安全有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
5.00%
发文量
1164
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信