Personalised Care in CKD: Moving Beyond Traditional Biomarkers.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Nephron Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1159/000543640
Thomas McDonnell, Rosamonde E Banks, Maarten W Taal, Nicolas Vuilleumier, Philip A Kalra
{"title":"Personalised Care in CKD: Moving Beyond Traditional Biomarkers.","authors":"Thomas McDonnell, Rosamonde E Banks, Maarten W Taal, Nicolas Vuilleumier, Philip A Kalra","doi":"10.1159/000543640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ultimate goal of precision medicine is to tailor treatment to specific disease processes, thereby optimising patient outcomes. This approach moves beyond the one-size-fits-all model, recognising at an individual level the unique combinations of molecular, genetic, and environmental factors determining disease progression and treatment response. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) exemplifies the need for precision medicine, given its complex and heterogeneous nature. Traditional biomarkers, such as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR), have long been the cornerstone of CKD diagnosis and management. However, these markers homogenise a diverse group of distinct conditions within CKD with separate pathophysiologies and progression rates. The standardisation of CKD definition has improved clarity and consistency but has inadvertently led to a generic classification system, which categorises patients with CKD based on these non-specific markers and fails to capture the nuances of individual patient conditions. As a result, there is a critical need for novel biomarkers that can more accurately represent specific aetiologies and mechanisms of CKD progression. By identifying and utilising novel biomarkers, the field of nephrology could better understand individual mechanisms of CKD progression and move towards tailored risk prediction and treatment strategies, ultimately improving patient outcomes. This review is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all biomarkers in CKD but a proposal to the nephrology community to think more pathophysiologically about CKD, recognise the importance of distinct primary kidney diseases, and start working towards a more personalised medicine approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":18998,"journal":{"name":"Nephron","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephron","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543640","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ultimate goal of precision medicine is to tailor treatment to specific disease processes, thereby optimising patient outcomes. This approach moves beyond the one-size-fits-all model, recognising at an individual level the unique combinations of molecular, genetic, and environmental factors determining disease progression and treatment response. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) exemplifies the need for precision medicine, given its complex and heterogeneous nature. Traditional biomarkers, such as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR), have long been the cornerstone of CKD diagnosis and management. However, these markers homogenise a diverse group of distinct conditions within CKD with separate pathophysiologies and progression rates. The standardisation of CKD definition has improved clarity and consistency but has inadvertently led to a generic classification system, which categorises patients with CKD based on these non-specific markers and fails to capture the nuances of individual patient conditions. As a result, there is a critical need for novel biomarkers that can more accurately represent specific aetiologies and mechanisms of CKD progression. By identifying and utilising novel biomarkers, the field of nephrology could better understand individual mechanisms of CKD progression and move towards tailored risk prediction and treatment strategies, ultimately improving patient outcomes. This review is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all biomarkers in CKD but a proposal to the nephrology community to think more pathophysiologically about CKD, recognise the importance of distinct primary kidney diseases, and start working towards a more personalised medicine approach.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nephron
Nephron UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ''Nephron'' comprises three sections, which are each under the editorship of internationally recognized leaders and served by specialized Associate Editors. Apart from high-quality original research, ''Nephron'' publishes invited reviews/minireviews on up-to-date topics. Papers undergo an innovative and transparent peer review process encompassing a Presentation Report which assesses and summarizes the presentation of the paper in an unbiased and standardized way.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信