Impact of an institutional antifungal stewardship program on antifungal usage and outcomes in patients with invasive fungal infections.

Abstract

Therapeutic and prophylactic use of antifungals is rising continuously. However, inadequate awareness of diagnostic and treatment guidelines and limited laboratory modalities lead to inappropriate use. This study assessed the impact of an institutional antifungal stewardship program on antifungal use practices and patient outcomes. In the pre-intervention phase, data was collected regarding antifungal therapy among patients with invasive fungal infections. Appropriateness of antifungal prescription was assessed. In the intervention phase, simple algorithms for diagnosis and management of fungal infections were prepared from international guidelines and incorporated into a booklet for distribution. Monthly training sessions were conducted. New serological and molecular tests and therapeutic drug monitoring were introduced. In the post-intervention phase, an antifungal stewardship team was constituted for clinical advisory on demand and ongoing training. Data regarding antifungal therapy was collected and compared with pre-intervention data. Untreated patients decreased from 25% to 18.9% post-intervention (P = .28). Appropriate antifungal use increased from 72.6% to 77.9% (P = .4) among patients with a single fungal infection, and from 57.1% to 88.5% (P = .04) for at least one infection among those with dual fungal infections. 49 incidents of inappropriate use in various categories were seen among 75 patients receiving antifungals pre-intervention, decreasing to 42 incidents among 94 patients post-intervention (P = .06), particularly evident among patients with dual infections (P = .002). Mortality increased from 51% to 75.86% post-intervention (P = .0001). Overall, the small improvement noticed in antifungal usage pattern can still be considered significant, given the limited study period.